Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Indians are bastards anyway'
Asia Times ^ | Debasish Roy Chowdhury

Posted on 06/22/2005 10:38:34 AM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 last
To: Gengis Khan

I won't defend Kissinger as I hate his policy. Realism is a failed policy for which we are now reaping the wind.


121 posted on 06/24/2005 2:14:40 PM PDT by dervish (multilateralism is the lowest common denominator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Reality check time!!!

Nehru himself give the go-ahead for massively increased military cooperation with the US after the Sino-India war of 62.This included armssales as well as espionage into China.It was under LBJ,that the US overtly started tilting towards Pakistan & refused India fighter jets,naval upgrades among others,which the Soviets willingly supplied.About the point on getting to it's feet,it was under Indira Gandhi that the Green revolution(for food sufficiency) took place.


122 posted on 06/24/2005 6:36:11 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Destro

JFK did have any edgy start with India esp with Nehru's ambitious non-alignment moves.But the Sino-Indian war saw him rushing to India's aid(despite it being only a few weeks after the Cuban missile crisis).


123 posted on 06/24/2005 6:38:14 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
cooperation with the US after the Sino-India war of 62

Like I said, playing both sides of the street.

it was under Indira Gandhi that the Green revolution(for food sufficiency) took place.

It was during Ghandi's regime, not "under" Gandhi. She had nothing to do with it. The green revolution was developed by the West and basically transplanted to India.

124 posted on 06/24/2005 6:42:17 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Playing both sides didn't include buying Russian arms till 1964 & what exactly is Ghandi regime??

Oops,I forgot that the definition of US ally is a servile client state.


125 posted on 06/24/2005 6:58:28 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

How many troops?

This is a great fantsay and one I would support if it could be real.


126 posted on 06/24/2005 8:45:02 PM PDT by dervish (multilateralism is the lowest common denominator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: dervish

Enough troops and special ops to take out the Paki nukes. Note: I'm NOT saying we should occupy that little cess-pit. All I'm saying is that the Pakis having nukes is dangerous -- far more than India or China having nukes. Why? Because they consider those nukes not Paki nukes butIslamic nukes. Why? Because they freely spread those around to terrorist regimes like IRan, NKorea and even tried to sell them to Libya (they probably have already given them to the Saudis). Why? Because they WILL give nukes to terrorisst groups -- the nukes that would explode on US soil would be coming through Pakiland once Mushie goes and Mushie WILL go, sooner or later.


128 posted on 06/27/2005 1:17:31 AM PDT by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson