He is that. But so is Randall Terry. The difference is Terry wants to be in a position of political power to distribute his jerkness to the public using the power of the state. Boortz just distributes his on a radio program.
Posted on 06/23/2005 6:09:37 AM PDT by steve-b
But would he fit in as the national face of the Republican party, because that's how he will be portrayed by the MSM. They will "David Duke" him to death.
It's people like Randall Terry who give hypocrites a bad name.
The Muslims are still outside the gates..
"He openly advocates killing folks who do not believe as he does".
I think I would take a pass on actually voting for Terry (but monkey)The doctors that are performing abortions are going a step beyond not believing as I do. There is a lot of killing going on but it is being done by the abortionist.
If those are actual quotes I disagree. If the guy said those things he's not fit for office.
I am a libertarian conservative, and I am not much afraid of a theocracy gaining ground in the US. Nonetheless, I don't think the GOP should allow Terry to represent the party in any way. A major political party should never endorse intolerance or hatred. This doesn't mean that morality or strong opinions should be abandoned.
Nonetheless, there are Christians, and then there are Christians, if you know what I mean.
He is that. But so is Randall Terry. The difference is Terry wants to be in a position of political power to distribute his jerkness to the public using the power of the state. Boortz just distributes his on a radio program.
I would have bet anything this was going to be the DUmmie FUnnies.
Gonna be several of us watching this thread:)
Boortz is right.
The party leadership needs to administer a "David Duke" kick to the curb, pronto.
To choose what?
So what else is new?
You're right. I just hope the electorate sees through all this MSM crap.......and I think they are, more and more every day. I admit Terry is a little over the edge, even for my "right leaning" views, but then again it might be a refreshing change from the gutless wonders in the state houses and the Congress. Who knows?
He wants a theocracy and to execute people who believe differently than he does and you can't find a nutcase?
Randall Terry is an uber-nutjob who needs to be locked in a soft room so he cant harm himself or others. He needs to be poked at and studied by busloads of scientists so they can figure out whats causing his nuttiness and help anyone else who may have the same problem. Mr. Theocracy is far too unqualified to be a dog-catcher much less a state senator.
Dickie Durbin is moving?
Glad I don't live in Florida ... I'm no fan of abortion, but someone who wants to execute abortion doctors is waaaaaaay beyond the pale (and wildly unrealistic as well). There's conservative, and then there's just plain nutty. Mr. Terry sounds like the latter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.