[marty60]

He must not have got the memo that the docs are more than likely FAKE. But then we know the NYT standards are iffy at best. A copy of a copy of a conversation as related by a third party is ....well, FACT to the NYT and it's pathetic staff.

[Teplukin]

Krugman's article is sillly. All of us Freepers were saavy enough to appreciate that WMD and ties to Al Queda were not the basic reason for the war. This was a war of liberation, intended to bring liberation to the Iraq people & avenge Saddam's insolence towards Bush I!

The fact that Freepers know this - and that Krugman iss confused by various references to WMD - says a lot about Krugman's intelligence.

I think it best that all true Freepers try to avoid reading Krugman in the future.