He must not have got the memo that the docs are more than likely FAKE. But then we know the NYT standards are iffy at best. A copy of a copy of a conversation as related by a third party is ....well, FACT to the NYT and it's pathetic staff.
posted on 06/24/2005 7:15:14 AM PDT
Krugman's article is sillly. All of us Freepers were saavy enough to appreciate that WMD and ties to Al Queda were not the basic reason for the war. This was a war of liberation, intended to bring liberation to the Iraq people & avenge Saddam's insolence towards Bush I!
The fact that Freepers know this - and that Krugman iss confused by various references to WMD - says a lot about Krugman's intelligence.
I think it best that all true Freepers try to avoid reading Krugman in the future.
posted on 06/26/2005 10:47:49 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson