Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2005 4:23:21 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather; BringBackMyHUAC; Alia

Oil in abundance is very necessary for military mobility. It has often been the case (and will be) that he who has the oil, wins.


2 posted on 06/24/2005 4:28:23 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"From a security perspective, it's as much of a threat as when the Japanese purchased (New York's) Rockefeller Center," he said by email.

Japan has been a democratic and capitalist country. China is a dictatorship and has influenced and threaten politics of other countries by economical terms. CSIS is nothing but headless third class experts who know nothing about what happened to Zimbabwe and Dominica Republic!
3 posted on 06/24/2005 4:31:23 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Give me a break. You're not going to improve our national security by preventing them from buying stuff from America. They can get oil from thousands of different places. You're not going to stop them from getting oil. Let the stockholders sell their oil for the highest price they can get, and if that is to the Chinese, then so be it.


4 posted on 06/24/2005 4:33:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

In general, whether they are from China or from Denmark, will we allow a government owned monopoly from another country buy a US firm? To me, doing so would let foreign socialism intrude directly into our economy. On that basis, at a minumum, I must vehemently oppose this! (Analogously, would we let PEMEX buy something here?).


5 posted on 06/24/2005 4:34:46 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

They should put a stipulation in the deal to make China stop pegging their currency to the dollar in return for letting the deal go through. It's a steep price, but if they want to stand on their own 2 feet and have the resources to do it they should have the responsibility for maintaining their own economy like everyone else and stop leeching off of us.


9 posted on 06/24/2005 4:45:15 PM PDT by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The good news is if they DO buy Unocal, the Chinese governemnt can take your home and build a refinery on it.


14 posted on 06/24/2005 4:55:24 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Those who argue our current account deficit doesn't matter, don't acknowledge we are selling off our national assets to fund it.
17 posted on 06/24/2005 4:58:54 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather; GOP_1900AD; Uncle George; mudblood; AnimalLover; hedgetrimmer; John Lenin; AnnaZ; ...

This seems eerily similar to the issues surrounding our boarders (sovereignty/national security). If Pres. Bush lets this go through, he may as well join the Democratic Party.


22 posted on 06/24/2005 5:19:59 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

You better believe it's a security issue.
China is thirty for oil.
They can easily divert the oil from here to China and leave us high and dry.


33 posted on 06/24/2005 8:37:47 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson