Skip to comments.
'South Park Conservatives': Bullying Liberals Back
NY Times ^
| 26 June 2005
| LIESL SCHILLINGER
Posted on 06/25/2005 8:00:59 PM PDT by Lorianne
IN a well-known spoof of a typical talk-radio exchange, two callers debate a fatuous point. The first says: ''Right-thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary, decent people are fed up with this country being sick and tired. I'm certainly not and I'm sick and tired of being told that I am.'' The second caller retorts, ''Well, I meet a lot of people, and I'm convinced that the vast majority of wrong-thinking people are right.'' A conservative housewife, listening to the blather, snaps, ''Liberal rubbish!'' and turns the dial. It's a shining example of what, in a country with a less sophisticated sense of humor, might be called Monty Python Toryism.
In ''South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias,'' Brian C. Anderson, charts the rise in respectability -- or, at least, of visibility and audibility -- of ''proudly anti-elitist'' right-wing thought in America's public dialogue over the last two decades, a development that was spearheaded by Rush Limbaugh in the late 1980's on talk radio and has since spread to other media in a process Anderson calls ''FOXification.'' To him, the popularity of the stingingly anti-P.C. cartoon series ''South Park'' signals the advent of a new generation of Americans who refuse to accept public censure for their scornful attitudes toward gay men and lesbians, Native Americans, environmentalism and abortion rights. In an effort not to gloat, he cloaks his descriptions of this triumph in the humble fleece of the common man (Limbaugh is, for example ''a college dropout'' who ''had put himself through a rigorous self-education, mastering an array of issues'') and champions talk radio as ''the first media forum in which ordinary Joes can actually get a hearing for their complaints about what liberals have wrought in America since the 1960's.''
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bookreview; briancanderson; southpark; southparkrepublicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
06/25/2005 8:01:00 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
After 20 years they're still yammering about Limbaugh.
It's an amazing thing, really.
To: Reactionary
And they will be at it for 20 more years.
To: Lorianne
"south park conservatives" is an excellent book....i am reading it now.
4
posted on
06/25/2005 8:05:53 PM PDT
by
wildwood
To: Lorianne
To him, the popularity of the stingingly anti-P.C. cartoon series ''South Park'' signals the advent of a new generation of Americans who refuse to accept public censure for their scornful attitudes toward gay men and lesbians, Native Americans, environmentalism and abortion rights.In other words, when they tell people to shut up, we thumb our noses at them which makes them furious. And how did "Native Americans" get thrown into the mix? I'm an Indian (see, I don't subscribe to the N/A moniker that they've imposed on us) and I'm known around these parts as the most anti-PC guy there is.
5
posted on
06/25/2005 8:08:43 PM PDT
by
MNnice
To: Lorianne
Anderson quotes an interview that Howard Kurtz, the Washington Post's media critic, conducted with Lawrence O'Donnell, a political analyst and screenwriter for ''The West Wing,'' in which O'Donnell said, ''You'll never, ever get the Republican TV show.'' Anderson and O'Donnell imply that this has something to do with politics, but isn't it more likely a question of ratings? Would anybody, even a conservative fan of ''South Park'' -- especially a conservative fan of ''South Park'' -- want to watch a sitcom about churchgoing parents with two children who lead an uneventful life and make regular donations to the Fraternal Order of Police?I guess that's why The Brady Bunch, Star Trek, et.al. are dismal failures.
</sarcasm>
6
posted on
06/25/2005 8:12:41 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Reactionary
It's because he is still around, after twenty years, that they still yammer. They just knew that he was a fluke, that no considerable number of people would like what he has to say.
When was the last time any of us heard anything about Air America (other than a host calling for W to be gunned down)?
7
posted on
06/25/2005 8:14:54 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
To: Lorianne
I couldn't stand to watch "The South Park" show for more than 5 minutes because, yes, I am a humorless prude but I could recognize what the show was doing. This is all enormously cheering. Political Correctness must die (and take Hate Crimes, Affirmative Action, and the ACLU into the grave with it).
8
posted on
06/25/2005 8:15:01 PM PDT
by
RedRover
(Fight the Wussification of America.)
To: MNnice
It's about how we are supposed to believe that your ancestors lived at one with nature and ate blossoms or someting...instead of believe they were humans who lived, loved, fought, died like everyone else.
9
posted on
06/25/2005 8:19:29 PM PDT
by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: randog
Which brings us to the subject of content. A recent report by the Dove Foundation found that G-rated movies are more profitable than any other category--and particularly when compared with R-rated movies, which average a profit of about $7 million, compared with about $79 million in profit for the average G. These figures do not mean that mature-themed movies will disappear. Indeed, of the 3,000 films Dove counted between 1989 and 2003, 1,533 were R-rated, compared with 123 G's. According to Dove Foundation chairman Dick Rolfe, this ratio is partly explained by the fact that studios no longer depend on satisfied audiences for their bread and butter. He says that movies now tend to be financed like shopping centers are, with the studios functioning like building contractors. They'll get paid something no matter what; it's the investors/financiers who are taking the biggest risk. (Dove sent copies of its report to 200 top mutual-fund and pension-fund managers.)
http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110006864
10
posted on
06/25/2005 8:20:02 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Lorianne
What a condescending creep.
O'Donnell said, ''You'll never, ever get the Republican TV show.'' Would anybody, even a conservative fan of ''South Park'' -- especially a conservative fan of ''South Park'' -- want to watch a sitcom about churchgoing parents with two children who lead an uneventful life and make regular donations to the Fraternal Order of Police? (Sniff)
Obviously, Anderson knows his audience: this book isn't intended for readers of The Times and The Economist and watchers of CNN. (double Sniff)
Translation: "Oh, we are soooo much more sophisticated than these conservative boobs. Here, let me show you how quaint their thinking is. Aren't you glad you're not one of those people?"
12
posted on
06/25/2005 8:21:33 PM PDT
by
MNnice
To: randog
who lead an uneventful lifeI wonder what they consider an uneventful life: having one spouse? not strung out on drugs? not having multiple abortions?
13
posted on
06/25/2005 8:22:47 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
To: MNnice
All one needs to do is see O'Donnell on a tirade to know he is not one to emulate. In fact, all O'Donnell has to do is open his mouth.
14
posted on
06/25/2005 8:24:19 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
To: MNnice
I'm a Native American, too. And fish-belly white to boot. ;D
15
posted on
06/25/2005 8:24:59 PM PDT
by
Wage Slave
(peevish coot)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Lorianne
the advent of a new generation of Americans who refuse to accept public censure for their scornful attitudes toward gay men and lesbians, Native Americans, environmentalism and abortion rights...blah blah blah
The leftie "journalists" still trying to get some licks in I see. LOL Morons.
17
posted on
06/25/2005 8:29:36 PM PDT
by
Libertina
(nonewgastax.com (We're going to win!))
To: RedRover
The ADA should go also------one of the most abused pieces of legislation ever.
18
posted on
06/25/2005 8:31:45 PM PDT
by
Mears
(Keep the government out of my face!)
To: lpettit
No. I mean like the Kennedy Clan.
19
posted on
06/25/2005 8:32:48 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Do something nice for a Gitmo detainee: buy him a pit bull, for his cell.)
To: Lorianne; .cnI redruM; c21sac; 537cant be wrong; 68 grunt; A. Patriot; A_Conservative_Chinese; ...
20
posted on
06/25/2005 8:36:46 PM PDT
by
EveningStar
("If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken / Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson