Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate over home sprinklers heats up (Coming soon to developments near you?)
Baltimore Sun ^ | June 27, 2005 | Timothy B. Wheeler

Posted on 06/27/2005 3:21:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"But fire safety advocates say the national average of 3,900 deaths remains too high, and they note that 87 percent of those killed in residential fires were in single-family homes or duplexes......in older homes - many without working smoke detectors ...."

Okay... then what good would sprinklers do?
Let's be real. If these dopes won't check the battery in a smoke detector, what are the odds they'll do the required service & maintance on a complicated Sprinkler System.

My guess is 10100 to one.

61 posted on 06/27/2005 5:51:12 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
Actually, all of these residential sprinkler systems will be equipped with tamper switches and flow sensors which will be hard-wired into autodialers straight to the local firehouse. You think you have a lot of false alarms now, just wait until these machines start dialing the firehouse at 4:00 in the morning when some maintenance crew is exercising the fire hydrant down the street.
62 posted on 06/27/2005 5:54:04 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
.....If the do-gooders have to spend money, let them distribute free smoke detectors from every urban firehouse. ....

And pay a staff to go out and check the batteries twice a year too. It would be cheaper.

63 posted on 06/27/2005 5:56:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
***We require "in house" sprinklers if you are more than 600 feet from a hydrant.***

Could you define where 'we' is?
NY, CA, ?
And when 'we' passed said ordinance and to what purpose?

And no offense, (honestly) but since more people die each year in bathtub accidents and from falling off ladders, what are your ordinances on those items in order to protect the people who live in 'we'?

64 posted on 06/27/2005 6:04:25 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

very good point about the added false alarms.


65 posted on 06/27/2005 6:04:36 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

First comes the requirement for new homes to have sprinkler systems.

Next comes the requirement that older houses are to be retrofitted with sprinker systems before they can be sold.

After that comes the requirement that ALL houses are equipped with sprinker systems.

Then, the local government will require that all houses within the city limits be inspected yearly and tests be performed by local companies loyal to the current administration.

Once all houses have sprinkler systems, they will have to pay a yearly permit fee to be allowed to have their homes certified "safe and in compliance with the fire code." Without this permit, you will not be allowed to live in the dangerous house.

Next, the county will require all residents external to the city to conform to the same requirements.

Once the state realizes the money and additinal power this will bring, a state regulation will be written along with an additional compliance permit and sticker that will have to be applied to the front door of each home in the state.

Next, the federal government will be involved and make it a nationwide regulation complete with an additional permit and federal sticker that must be applied to your front door.

Once the federal government gets involved, we will have "no notice" inspections to catch those who forge fake door permits.

But hey! It's worth it........it's for the children. Don't you feel better knowing that big brother is keeping you safe? No matter what the cost in money and freedom, safety trumps all!


66 posted on 06/27/2005 6:09:25 AM PDT by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
***But doesn't halon suck all the oxygen out of the room, making it dangerous for you to be there when it goes off?***

Halon is now outlawed and has been for a long time.

67 posted on 06/27/2005 6:13:43 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DH

(((Groan)))

It's so true.

But WE DON"T HAVE TO TAKE IT!!

If you're not trapped with this yoke yet, speak up!


68 posted on 06/27/2005 6:14:26 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DH

Please - don't give them anymore bright ideas.


69 posted on 06/27/2005 6:16:30 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
If your goal is to eliminate risk and to minimize the need for fire personnel, it would also make sense to require new homes to be built from concrete and to outlaw all combustible materials from use in home furnishings. Natural gas would need also to be eliminated as a heating/cooking fuel as the open flame adds risk.

After all imaginable precautions had been adopted, I doubt fire deaths will fall appreciably as the tinderboxes of older homes in disrepair and ajoined housing in cities would still be a problem.

Life has its risks.

70 posted on 06/27/2005 6:18:13 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DH
...and the requirement to increase taxes on the common serfs..........NO OTHER REASON!

You have nailed it. Whatever the additional cost, it is added to the base cost for property tax assessments. These new regulations will artificially raise the community value of comparable sales. The value of homes without sprinklers will be raised because of the value of the new home sales. Higher values = more tax money. Government wins again...roll over.

71 posted on 06/27/2005 6:24:17 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Smoke detectors are $10 now. If you know someone who you think should have one....buy it for them.

I've done that. I've given away CO detectors too. Cheap way to save lives, IMHO.

A box of smoke detectors down at the soup kitchen might not be a bad idea, either.

72 posted on 06/27/2005 6:26:52 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Anyone with a Mortgage should just send their monthly Bill to company's like Pfizer, they'll eventually own it anyway, might as well let them make the payment. The Sprinkler Bill as well, since they'll just be protecting their investment. Blackbird.


73 posted on 06/27/2005 6:37:09 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
"But doesn't halon suck all the oxygen out of the room, making it dangerous for you to be there when it goes off?"

It can displace O2 if the volume is sufficient, for the space involved, and it can also be an irritant.

74 posted on 06/27/2005 6:44:57 AM PDT by Jonx6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
"Sprinkler heads have to be installed per NFPA so every ten foot of floor space is covered."
NFPA 13D does not require every square foot be covered.
"In a house you need a pump in lieu of a 'stand pipe'."
Standpipes are only required in structures 4 floors and higher or with internal travel distances of more than 200’ (150’ in a sprinklered structure).

Whether or not a sprinkler system has a pump depends on the type of system and the water pressure in that area. Some systems just have heads coming off the domestic tap in each of the protected areas.

"The main feed to the house has to be separate from your domestic water supply…"
No, it does not. The flow required by a system depends on its use; foster home, private residence, ect... If the domestic water feed cannot provide the required flow you can install a new water feed or provide tanks and a pump. Typically a 13D system flow should be enough to provide 2 heads for 10 to 30 minuets depending on the occupancy.
"Of course I'm only basing my opinion on 35 years in commercial construction - estimating, engineering and project management."
Yeah, that sounds about right.
75 posted on 06/27/2005 7:41:31 AM PDT by Jonx6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Safty nazi's seek to enter your home in the name of safety.

Open up its the safety nazi's to inspect your home.


76 posted on 06/27/2005 7:44:53 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Knock! Knock!


77 posted on 06/27/2005 7:50:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
For every new edict, whether it's from the local building department or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or a law passed by Congress to save us from our own selfishness or stupidity (low-flush toilets are a good example) you know there are industries looking to make some big bucks as a result.

Knowing Maryland's reputation for honest government, would anyone be surprised if it transpired that someone with influence in the Montgomery County government had a financial interest in a company that makes or installs home sprinkler systems? Or at least had a brother or a cousin who did?

These things don't happen spontaneously.

78 posted on 06/27/2005 8:10:49 AM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

My opinon is that yeah, cars may be cheaper without airbags and houses more expensive with copper wires but those are worthwhile.
Kids are better off slepping with a sprinkler head above them, because the fact is smoke detectors do not wake many children up.

One well place sprinkler head would have saved almost a hundred people in the Rhode Island fire.


79 posted on 06/27/2005 8:12:11 AM PDT by Jonx6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

You are wise.

Follow the money.


80 posted on 06/27/2005 8:12:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson