Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain's Prince Harry had blood test to prove Charles was father: newspaper
Agence France-Presse ^ | June 28, 2005

Posted on 06/28/2005 4:41:31 PM PDT by RWR8189

LONDON (AFP) - Britain's royal family forced the late Princess Diana to blood test her younger son, Prince Harry, to prove he was not the offspring of an affair with an army officer, according to a newspaper report.

Diana, who died in 1997, did not tell Harry why his blood was being taken, the Sun newspaper said in extracts from a book by Simone Simmons, an "energy healer" billed as a former close friend and confidante of the princess.

Senior royals, notably Queen Elizabeth's husband Prince Philip, feared that their son, Prince Charles, who was married to Diana, might not have been the real father of Harry, who was born in September 1984.

Diana had previously had a passionate affair with army officer Major James Hewitt, and there had been rumours that Harry -- who, like Hewitt, has red hair -- was the product of that relationship.

Simmons, whose book "Diana: The Last Word," is being serialised by the tabloid newspaper, claimed she felt Diana should know about the rumours Harry was illegitimate.

"It fell to me to impart the unpleasant news to the princess," the paper quoted her as saying.

Diana, who publicly admitted to her affair with Hewitt in a 1995 television interview, insisted that the dates of her affair with the officer meant he could not possibly be Harry's father, Simmons said.

However, she was pressured to carry out DNA tests on both Harry and his elder brother, Prince William, to prove their paternity, the Sun said in its Wednesday edition.

The tests showed that both princes had been fathered by Charles, the heir to the British throne, who Diana finally divorced in 1996, a year before her death in a Paris car crash.

On Monday, the Sun printed an extract from the book in which Simmons claims Diana had a passionate affair with John F Kennedy Jr, the son of the assassinated US president, who himself died in a plane crash in 1999.

Some other British newspapers have ridiculed Simmons' supposed revelations, saying she was never especially close to Diana and is most likely inventing stories for financial gain.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: diana; paternity; princecharles; princeharry; princessdiana; royalfamily; royals; thelastword; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2005 4:41:31 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Tell me again why this woman was so adored?


2 posted on 06/28/2005 4:42:29 PM PDT by Run Silent Run Deep (PRAY FOR THOSE THAT HURT AND HATE US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; All

That been long rumor that Prince Charley is not Harry daddy LONG RUMOR tell me something I don't know shrink LOL!


3 posted on 06/28/2005 4:44:02 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

I haven't a clue.


4 posted on 06/28/2005 4:44:07 PM PDT by Isabelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Sheesh! Diana was no saint, but people should just let the woman rest in peace.


5 posted on 06/28/2005 4:45:00 PM PDT by PilloryHillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep
The kid's got his dad's eyes. He really looks like his fraternal grandfather.

Red hair? Aren't those bluebloods rather inbred?
6 posted on 06/28/2005 4:47:15 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Wasn't that whole story on a couple of Maury Povich shows several years back?


7 posted on 06/28/2005 4:47:24 PM PDT by Tacis ("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

HA! No way, not when there's money to be made off of her...even better that she's not around to respond to any of it.

Nice how she manages to swipe at TWO dead people by talking about a supposed affair with JFK Jr. Real class act, this lady.


8 posted on 06/28/2005 4:48:14 PM PDT by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

I mut have missed that epiode.


9 posted on 06/28/2005 4:49:36 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
He can't be his son, his nose if half Charlie's size.
10 posted on 06/28/2005 4:49:47 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

Probably for the general reasons of any other celebrity cult, like the fans of Jackie Onassis/Kennedy, of Michael Jackson of recent memory, or leftist clintorroids. And multiply it by "royalty mistique".


11 posted on 06/28/2005 4:50:11 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

Duh "episode". Way to kill a joke, dude.


12 posted on 06/28/2005 4:50:16 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep
"Tell me again why this woman was so adored?"

Exactly. But they still continue to bash Carmella. (Rollin my eyes here)...

sw

13 posted on 06/28/2005 4:50:47 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

She may have had affairs but Harry has always looked like Charles' son in spite of the red hair.


14 posted on 06/28/2005 4:52:19 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I don't think Diana was sure he was hers.
15 posted on 06/28/2005 4:54:03 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep
Diana fit our celebrity culture to a T.

Why the Brits revered her is beyond me.

16 posted on 06/28/2005 4:54:29 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Britain's royal family forced the late Princess Diana to blood test her younger son, Prince Harry, to prove he was not the offspring of an affair with an army officer, according to a newspaper report.

Imaging how shallow the royal gene pool would be without the numerous affairs.....

17 posted on 06/28/2005 4:54:33 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The Sun?



Puh-leaze.


18 posted on 06/28/2005 4:55:16 PM PDT by Petronski (Be alert! The world needs more lerts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

Sluts and nuts. Which category does she best fit into?


19 posted on 06/28/2005 4:56:53 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Whether this article is true or not, Diana was a kooky slut and I guess Charles was an SOB as well. Between the two of them I always liked Charles better. Seemed to me he got an overly bum rap while she was idolized. She took him through the ringer for infidelity, meanwhile she was nailing everything in town and getting away with it.


20 posted on 06/28/2005 4:58:36 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Watching the hysteria surrounding the Diana funeral, I was convinced the entire country was having a nervous breakdown.

Running after the hearse, throwing flowers at the windscreen......they had all taken leave of their senses.

21 posted on 06/28/2005 5:02:03 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bannie

Diana's brother Charles, in the middle, has red hair, as does her sister Sarah.

22 posted on 06/28/2005 5:03:56 PM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel

Forget the hair. Buy them some shoulders.


23 posted on 06/28/2005 5:05:51 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: livius

;)


24 posted on 06/28/2005 5:08:02 PM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

it seems to me they might not release the information if the test showed charles wasn't the father.


25 posted on 06/28/2005 5:11:09 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel

Harry strongly resembles her sister Sarah.

Why would anybody have to "force" Harry to have a DNA test? The Queen or Charles could have gotten Harry's doctor to order a test on the QT any time they liked, or taken him to another doctor they trusted, and Diana wouldn't have known a thing about it (neither would this talking-through-her-hat Suzanne person).

Even if Suzanne Simmons is telling the truth about things Diana told her, why should we trust Diana and her tall tales about Harry and JFK, Jr? She was a liar and manipulator.


26 posted on 06/28/2005 5:16:16 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Sometime around 1776 my family showed they no longer gave a tinkers dam about the royal snoots. We have always named our dogs Duke, Queenie, Prince, King and Princess. I now see why.


27 posted on 06/28/2005 5:17:40 PM PDT by BTCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bannie
I also believe that Diana's brother has red hair. A family trait it would seem. I suppose it's no wonder that Harry's gone off the deep end with his strange taste in costumes and such.

If I was part of that dysfunctional family; I'd probably be a little "touched" as well.

28 posted on 06/28/2005 5:18:58 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

I am afraid I can't post a link to the pics, but I have seen the british soldier that was runored to be the father...And if you ever see the pictures I have of the soldier and Harry shot from the same angle, with similar expressions..you will be shocked by the obvious look of a shared bloodline...


29 posted on 06/28/2005 5:30:14 PM PDT by uncle fenders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All

I am afraid I can't post a link to the pics, but I have seen the british soldier that was runored to be the father...And if you ever see the pictures I have of the soldier and Harry shot from the same angle, with similar expressions..you will be shocked by the obvious look of a shared bloodline...


30 posted on 06/28/2005 5:30:15 PM PDT by uncle fenders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

Let alone the ears....


31 posted on 06/28/2005 5:55:38 PM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
they had all taken leave of their senses...

I felt the same way watching the royal wedding hysteria initially. I do actually feel sorry for all involved. A naive young woman entering what turns out to be a loveless marriage into a dysfunctional family in view oif all the world's media 24/7.

This is why they should abolish the monarchy or turn them more background-ish, ala the cycling royals of Holland, or the Scandinavian royals who were denied permission to let the royal limosine doublepark while picking up palace drycleaning on the grounds that 'if we let the royals do it then everyone else will want to'.

Ojh ye, and Prince Phillip should be permanently gagged.

32 posted on 06/28/2005 6:00:31 PM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"Royal family?" Or the Flukes of Hazard? What a low-class soap opera the "royals" are!


33 posted on 06/28/2005 6:03:47 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

Because she, with a sterling Brit pedigree married a creep with a German pedigree and doubtful capacity along with a penchant for the ugly duckling progeny of one of his forefather's mistresses.

Because that schmuck took a virgin young woman and destroyed her as best he could.


34 posted on 06/28/2005 6:10:19 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

She was damned adorable and used like a pair of cheap shoes by that damned inbreed bunch or royals in England.


35 posted on 06/28/2005 6:12:28 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
She was damned adorable

"It is always tempting to impute
Unlikely virtues to the cute."
- PJ O'Eourke

36 posted on 06/28/2005 6:29:48 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (It's a Druid Thing (Improper Tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Diana had previously had a passionate affair with army officer Major James Hewitt, and there had been rumours that Harry -- who, like Hewitt, has red hair -- was the product of that relationship.

Reminds me of the Farkle Family on Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In. Perhaps that red hair came from trusted neighbor Ferd Berfle.

37 posted on 06/28/2005 9:12:31 PM PDT by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirited

She was nuts before he got to her.


38 posted on 06/28/2005 9:48:08 PM PDT by Run Silent Run Deep (PRAY FOR THOSE THAT HURT AND HATE US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123; Lijahsbubbe; aculeus; dighton; kingattax
>>>it seems to me they might not release the information if the test showed charles wasn't the father. <<<

The tests showed that both princes had been fathered by Charles, the heir to the British throne, who Diana finally divorced in 1996, a year before her death in a Paris car crash.

However...

Some other British newspapers have ridiculed Simmons' supposed revelations, saying she was never especially close to Diana and is most likely inventing stories for financial gain.


39 posted on 06/29/2005 1:41:58 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Spirited

Camilla is related to Charles? Who is their shared forefather?


40 posted on 06/29/2005 8:59:03 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Androcles
A naive young woman entering what turns out to be a loveless marriage

Didn't that same naive young woman try to kill her step mother by pushing her down a flight of stairs?

41 posted on 06/29/2005 9:05:09 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I thought royal bastards was a hallowed tradition.


42 posted on 06/29/2005 9:06:32 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird; blam
I also believe that Diana's brother has red hair. A family trait it would seem.

Maybe they're all Neanderthals?

Sir Blam, what say you?

Red hair may be the genetic legacy of Neanderthals

43 posted on 06/29/2005 9:52:25 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Neve heard of that before although I know they weren't meant to get on. Any details?

At the end of the day, I'd say that the carry on with the British monarchy and nobility prove that outbreeding is a good idea on a regular basis!


44 posted on 06/29/2005 1:32:56 PM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

I don't know how true the story is. I read it here on Free Republic. Diana apparently didn't like her new step-mother and - according to what I read - she treated her very badly. Supposedly, when Diana was in her teens, she pushed the woman down the stairs. Her father got very upset with her and they didn't speak for 6 months or so.

Do other freepers remember any details?


45 posted on 06/29/2005 1:59:39 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Absolutely remarkable resemblance. And I don't mean just the hair.

The kid looks nothing like Charles.

If he's not Hewitt's then that is one freakish coincidence.

46 posted on 06/29/2005 2:15:03 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

Well, adored and/or pitied.


47 posted on 06/29/2005 2:16:44 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal; uncle fenders
I've posted those pics also. That kid has to be Hewitt's.
48 posted on 06/29/2005 8:13:49 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Ted Kennedy - isn't it time for you to diet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

No, one or more of Camilla's ancestresses were mistress/es to his ancestral monarach/s.


49 posted on 06/30/2005 4:54:28 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Run Silent Run Deep

Apparently they weren't certain he had the nuts to get to her?


50 posted on 06/30/2005 4:58:09 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson