It seems that Time Magazine and its lawyer Ted Olsen (the same as the former Solicitor General?) is ready to offer up the leaker. Perhaps the leaker(s) was as good of as source as Dan Rather gets or perhaps the leaker was more after Bush than Wilson. Who knows what agenda is going on here but there is some reason that two reporters are willing to consider jail rather than give up a name and I doubt it has anything to do with protecting "sources." There is more to this, I'm betting. Does anyone have any bright ideas on this?
"Perhaps the leaker(s) was as good of as source as Dan Rather..."
It would be tough to reveal a source that was "made up" to hurt Bush, yet I do think it's a good source, otherwise they would out him/her. I will laugh my ass off if it turns out to be a Democrat official.