Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Bush "lied" about W M Ds.....what about these fine people ??????
www.rightwingnews.com ^ | 6/30/2005 | Max

Posted on 06/30/2005 11:48:42 AM PDT by StudentsForBush

Since we haven't found WMD in Iraq, a lot of the anti-war/anti-Bush crowd is saying that the Bush administration lied about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Well, if they're going to claim that the Bush administration lied, then there sure are a lot of other people, including quite a few prominent Democrats, who have told the same "lies" since the inspectors pulled out of Iraq in 1998. Here are just a few examples that prove that the Bush administration didn't lie about weapons of mass destruction...

 

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

 

 

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

 

 

 

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983"

 

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

 

 

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

 

 

 

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

 

 

 

 

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

 

 

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

 


              DEMOCRATS: Example of true Hypocrisy !

                               

Brought to you by: http://www.naurepublicans.com



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton; gore; wmd

1 posted on 06/30/2005 11:48:44 AM PDT by StudentsForBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

Great job!

Here is another group that was fooled. The UK Parliament felt that there were WMD's in Iraq in 1999.

Parliament's concern re WMDs and Saddam in 1999

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmfaff/407/40704.htm#a4

IRAQ


19. In the aftermath of the 1990-91 Gulf War, UN Security Council Resolution 687 obliged Iraq to destroy its nuclear, biological and chemical weapons and its ballistic missiles with a range over 150km, and to undertake not to develop these weapons in future. The United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were charged with ensuring Iraq's compliance. In December 1998, however, Iraq's refusal to co-operate with UNSCOM and the IAEA resulted in the withdrawal of weapons inspectors and the launch by the USA and the UK of Operation Desert Fox.[41]


20. In December 1999, the Security Council adopted a UK-drafted resolution (1284) that "makes clear that Iraq must give up its aspirations to have WMD" and also creates the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) to replace UNSCOM as the body responsible for disarming Iraq of its nuclear, biological, chemical and ballistic missile capabilities.[42] If Baghdad fully co-operates with UNMOVIC and the IAEA, Resolution 1284 provides for the suspension of sanctions on Iraq, but controls would remain in place on prohibited items.[43] The resolution did not have the unanimous backing of the fifteen member Security Council: there were eleven votes in favour and four abstentions from France, Russia, China and Malaysia, which had a non-permanent seat on the Council at that time. Reports have suggested that the resolution was weaker than it might have been due to Russian and Chinese opposition to sanctions and France's unwillingness to jeopardise its commercial and diplomatic relations with Iraq. The resolution did not contain an earlier provision which had called for the inclusion of UNSCOM inspectors in the new monitoring organisation. There was concern that without institutional memory to augment the archives that UNMOVIC will inherit, the new Commission will be unnecessarily disadvantaged in terms of fulfilling its disarmament mandate.[44]


21. Dr Hans Blix, whom we visited in New York in March, took up his appointment as the first Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC on 1 March 2000. Under the terms of SCR 1284, he had forty-five days in which to produce an organisational plan for UNMOVIC. This plan was presented to, and unanimously endorsed by, the Security Council on 13 April 2000. The FCO informed us that "a successful first meeting of the new UNMOVIC Commissioners was held on 23-24 May, during which Dr Blix described progress on setting up the organisation ... and said that UNMOVIC will be ready to start work in Iraq by the end of August 2000."[45]


22. Prior to December 1998, UNSCOM and the IAEA succeeded in destroying large quantities of chemical and biological weapons materials and facilities as well as Scud-type missiles. A nuclear weapons programme was also uncovered. However, the Iraqi regime's systematic concealment of proscribed items and obstruction of weapons inspectors means that not everything has been uncovered. It is more than likely, therefore, that Iraq has taken advantage of the absence of inspectors to rebuild its WMD and missile programmes and capabilities.[46] There have been reports claiming that Iraq has conducted tests of the Al Samoud missile since the withdrawal of the inspectors.[47] The FCO advised us that the Al Samoud has a declared design range of less than 150 kilometres which means that it does not contravene SCR 687. However, the absence of inspectors in Iraq means that the international community has not been able to ensure that the tests were compliant with SCR 687.[48]


23. We support the Government in its diplomatic efforts within the UN Security Council to ensure that UNMOVIC and the IAEA are given the maximum opportunity to complete the process of disarmament in Iraq in line with relevant UN resolutions. We wish to see UNMOVIC start its work in Iraq at the earliest opportunity. It is important that UNSCOM's successor, UNMOVIC, commands a mandate of equal strength to that of its predecessor to enable it to conduct further inspections of Iraq's WMD activity effectively. We urge the Government strongly to resist any attempt to dilute the international inspectors' powers of inspection or to compromise with Iraq on the composition of the Commission. We agree with the Government that "for so long as Iraq denies UNMOVIC access there can be no progress towards the suspension and eventual lifting of sanctions."[49]


2 posted on 06/30/2005 11:51:27 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

3 posted on 06/30/2005 11:56:14 AM PDT by StudentsForBush (www.NAUrepublicans.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush; All
Wasn't 24 vials of saran gas found in Falujha?

Wasn't a burn agent found in the Iran boarder?
4 posted on 06/30/2005 12:07:46 PM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Democrats, Socialists........................ Is there really a difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

What about all the intelligence agencies of the world? Everyone thought Iraq had WMDs, why wouldn't they have them?

The "Bush lied" meme started with Joe Wilson and gang. They decided Bush's "truthfulness" quotient was too high so they targeted a small point on the WMD claim - the nuclear angle - the weakest link seemingly at the time, Bush's "16 famous words." The nuclear claim was blurred into WMD's yet not one publicized analyst, Thielmann, Wilson, whoemever, doubted Iraq had some Chem and Bio capacities and programs. They, and others might have questioned the need for war based on these weapons, but they didn't doubt their existence.

Turns out Tenet's "slam dunk" was a brick. French intel, Germans, Brits, everyone was wrong.


5 posted on 06/30/2005 12:10:39 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Excellent summary.

One of these days enough people will wake up to the real scandal of no WMDs in Iraq.

How did the mediots, MSM and left wing politicians around the world know that there were no WMD's in Iraq before the big war ended, inspite of a decade of data saying there were WMD's.

When the word/truth finally gets out about how the leftwing mediots, MSM and left wing politicians knew that there were no WMDs left in Iraq, this will disappear very quickly and quietly.


6 posted on 06/30/2005 12:18:58 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

bump


7 posted on 06/30/2005 12:32:51 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The modern Democratic Party: Attacking our defenders and defending our attackers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

[breathlessly...] But you don't understand... Booosh must have time traveled back to 1998 and forced these people to say these things... Karl Rove has been "fixing" the facts for years behind the scenes... bla bla bla bla bla...

(/DUmmie mindset)


8 posted on 06/30/2005 12:51:57 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (Honk If You've Never Seen An Uzi Fired From A Car Window)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

Always love this one!


9 posted on 06/30/2005 6:22:53 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StudentsForBush

bookmark


10 posted on 06/30/2005 8:11:01 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson