Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Activists Ask Bush to Consider Constructionist Jurists for Supreme Court
PROJECT 21 NATIONAL CENTER.ORG ^ | JULY 1, 2005 | Director, Project 21.org

Posted on 07/04/2005 5:41:28 PM PDT by CHARLITE

List of Characteristics Important to Black Americans Cited

Today's announcement of a vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court provides President George W. Bush with an important duty that has the potential to affect judicial decision-making for generations to come. Members of the black leadership network Project 21 are calling upon the President to ensure that all nominees under consideration will preserve and protect the U.S Constitution.

Peter Kirsanow, a Project 21 member and commissioner on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, said: "I'm confident that the President will nominate someone with integrity and wisdom who understands that the proper role of a Supreme Court justice is to interpret the text of the Constitution, rather than, as Justice Thomas put it, promote 'the faddish slogans of the cognoscenti.'"

A disturbing legal practice called "judicial activism" has been used to legitimize flag-burning, decreased private property rights protections and legalized partial-birth abortions against both popular opinion and legislative and constitutional direction. In response to the ongoing threat posed by this activism, Project 21's Judicial Working Group has compiled a list of criteria that President Bush and his advisors should consider when evaluating Supreme Court candidates:

* A commitment to a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

* Recognition of the importance of letting the state governments decide matters that exclusively involve state business.

* Uphold the Judeo-Christian heritage on which our nation and the Constitution were based.

* Be dedicated to individual rights and private property rights.

* Stand for the law over politics and not legislate from the courtroom.

* Have the conviction not to waver when pressured by outside influences.

Throughout his re-election campaign, President Bush promised, "I will continue to appoint federal judges who know the difference between personal opinion and the strict interpretation of the law."

"We are not looking for a liberal or a conservative jurist to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. We are looking for a strict constructionist," said Project 21 member Mychal Massie. "We are looking for someone who can uphold the Constitution, not rewrite it."

Project 21 takes no position on the confirmation of any particular judicial nominee, but believes that it is in the best interest of the United States that judicial vacancies are filled with appropriate speed.

Project 21, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, has been a leading voice of the African-American community since 1992. For more information, contact David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or Project21@nationalcenter.org, or visit Project 21's website at http://www.project21.org/P21Index.html.

New Visions Commentaries can be found at http://nationalcenter.org/P21NewVisions.html.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activists; appeal; black; blacklash; bush; constructions; deneenborelli; freedomworks; judicial; kirsanow; nominees; oconnor; president; project21; replacement; retiring; scotus; strict

1 posted on 07/04/2005 5:41:30 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Congressman Billybob; bocopar
SCOTUS appointee ping!

Char :)

3 posted on 07/04/2005 5:42:52 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

That's one change in American politics in the last 100 years. Used to be that the citizens didn't think much beyond the street they lived on.


4 posted on 07/04/2005 5:44:28 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

Did you read the article and these sentences: "I'm confident that the President will nominate someone with integrity and wisdom who understands that the proper role of a Supreme Court justice is to interpret the text of the Constitution, rather than, as Justice Thomas put it, promote 'the faddish slogans of the cognoscenti.'" or this "We are not looking for a liberal or a conservative jurist to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. We are looking for a strict constructionist," said Project 21 member Mychal Massie. "We are looking for someone who can uphold the Constitution, not rewrite it."

That doesn't sound very liberal to me -- in fact this whole group doesn't sound very liberal. Can you point out what I am missing in the article -- read it twice and don't understand your comments.


5 posted on 07/04/2005 5:47:46 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: William Creel

Thank you! I thought the same thing when I saw the headline and then I read the article several times to make sure it was what I thought it was and even then I thought I was missing something. Guess I was shocked to see their comments after all the comments by JJ and his ilk.


7 posted on 07/04/2005 5:53:58 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

The U.S.A.,learn to correctly read posts on Free Republic or leave it.


8 posted on 07/04/2005 5:54:46 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; mhking

project 21 bump


9 posted on 07/04/2005 5:57:13 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

The headline gives you the group's position even without reading the article. A constructionist is one who believes that the constitution only means what it said when the framers wrote it. They don't view it as a living document that changes over time and with fads and styles.


10 posted on 07/04/2005 5:59:37 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

You do know that Michael H. King (mhking) is on the advisory board of Project 21, don't you?


11 posted on 07/04/2005 5:59:47 PM PDT by wolfpat (dum vivimus, vivamus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: CHARLITE

Project 21 bump! Black people need RKBA and private property rights (among others) even more than more economically-privileged groups.


13 posted on 07/04/2005 6:02:28 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("I am saying that the government's complicity is dishonest and disingenuous." ~NCSteve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel; PhiKapMom

well...
ahem...
Be it known that "I" have NEVER posted a response without reading the article first in all my years!!!



heh heh....


14 posted on 07/04/2005 6:20:06 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (Get your brand new 'penumbra and emanation' converter boxes, while they are on sale, hecho en china.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

I knew the meaning of the word constructionists -- I thought I might be wrong because I didn't know about Project 21 -- if I knew Michael was a member I would have had no doubt.

The problem is all the liberal black/hispanic groups we keep hearing from and my first reaction was this is too good to be true. Then I saw the Freeper comments and thought I must have missed something.

ACLU, NAACP, LULAC and the list goes on of groups that I see articles from and the article doesn't match the headlines.

In this case, the head line and the article match perfectly and am really glad to read about this Project 21 group.


15 posted on 07/04/2005 6:22:26 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2

Your comments made me burst out laughing! Happy 4th of July!


16 posted on 07/04/2005 6:25:12 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Presently, only three justices meet the common-sense criteria demanded by Project 21. It's incredible that it even needs to be stated that Supreme Court justices should rule based on the Constitution's language and it's authors' original intent rather than on the chic political correctness of the day, as if the Constitution did not contain its own means for amendment.

But here we are - - the Supreme Court is top-heavy with pompous, liberal, activist scumbags and Bush has a chance to replace at least one of them with a new justice who has respect for American tradition and its founding principles.

Dubya better come through.


17 posted on 07/04/2005 6:39:12 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Another BIG BUMP for the amazing Project 21.


18 posted on 07/04/2005 6:49:14 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

bttt


19 posted on 07/05/2005 12:07:19 AM PDT by lunarbicep ("Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve." - G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
As a "non-partisan group", we (Project 21) as a group cannot endorse a specific name for the President, but we can establish criteria and qualifications that we believe the White House should follow. Personally, I'd love to see the President nominate Janice Rogers Brown, but considering that she's just been named to the DC Circuit, I don't anticipate her name being submitted.

I have to agree with the criteria - a strict constructionist in the vein of Thomas or Scalia, certainly one who does not feel the urge to "legislate" from the bench - is who the President should choose.

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

20 posted on 07/05/2005 4:46:09 AM PDT by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel; Lazamataz
Reminds me of Lazamataz's funniest tag line:

"Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1999!"

21 posted on 07/05/2005 5:58:47 AM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
While I am largely in agreement with the him, the statement "judicial activism" has been used to legitimize flag-burning, is inapt.

Burning our beloved flag, heinous though the act is, represents an exercise of free speech. Just my opinion, of course.

22 posted on 07/05/2005 8:32:50 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Ping
23 posted on 07/05/2005 12:55:20 PM PDT by T Lady (The only good Democrat is a Democrat that's been voted out of office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I think the people who really care if the judge is conservative or liberal are the special interest groups that are pushing the buttons on the senate. I would rather have a conservative, but will settle for a constructionist who is faithful to the constitution. So, I can agree with these folks on this issue.


24 posted on 07/05/2005 1:38:11 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mhking; All

I nominate mhking !


25 posted on 07/05/2005 4:04:37 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I'm an idiot.:P Forgive me.

I have long petitioned for an "edit" function. lol

26 posted on 07/05/2005 4:09:44 PM PDT by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson