Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia will equip Iranian Submarines with Missiles
India-Defence ^

Posted on 07/06/2005 12:08:22 AM PDT by Srirangan

Quoting a report from the Second International Naval Show (IMDS-2005) in St. Petersburg.

Moreover, Kommersant found out that Rosoboronexport is negotiating with Iran about repair and modernization of Iranian submarines. Iran has three submarines of Project 877EKM that were supplied by Russia in 1992 (Russian name of the sub B-219, Iranian—901 Tareq), in June 1993 (B-224, 902 Noor) and in November 1996 (B-175, 903 Yunes). It was expected that all the major components that already exceeded their life expectancy will be replaced. Also, the new anti-ship missile complex Club-S with the target distance of 200 km will be installed on these subs. The refurbishing of each sub would be done under the contract which costs anywhere from $80 to $90 million. Originally it was expected that the refurbishing will be done in Zvezdochka Co (Severo-Dvinsk) but Admiralty Shipyards are also fighting for the contract.


Complete Report: Russia Will equip Iranian Submarines with Missiles


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; iran; missiles; navalshow; politicsofcash; russia; russiaunderminesus; stpetersburg; submarines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last
To: Alter Kaker

I agree with that. The crack about Commies was more a joke than anything else, but you are right about name calling. Although to a certain extant this is only a continuation of their policy under communism, which argues in favor of it being nationalism.


81 posted on 07/06/2005 4:00:08 PM PDT by SoIA-79 ("The plans differ; the planners are all alike." – Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They are probably a better shallow water boat than our nuke subs. Any former sub people out there would know better than I do.


They are a problem, but I'm sure that if need be, the US could find a solution to them


82 posted on 07/06/2005 4:20:31 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ashamed Canadian

Can you even imagine being on a sub crewed by the Iranians?



Think of the smell.


83 posted on 07/06/2005 4:30:32 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

You are right but this country will continue to try and appease the Ruskies. Barf.


84 posted on 07/06/2005 5:30:49 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Let's put Nukes in the Ukraine.


85 posted on 07/06/2005 6:41:32 PM PDT by benjibrowder (This is a tagline virus. Please help me spread by copying this and making it your tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Are Iranians any better at submarine shopping than Canadians are?


86 posted on 07/06/2005 6:54:33 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Impeach Judge Greer - In memory of Terri Schindler <strike>Schiavo</strike> - www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

He may have big dreams. But the rapidly declining population makes such dreams moot. A nation, in peacetime, can't continue to have 170 deaths for every 100 births -- especially on top of a net immigration outflow.


87 posted on 07/06/2005 7:52:55 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Russia? An attractive investment option? Not with Putin helping his cronies steal companies left and right. All Russia has going for it is the flat tax. But what good is low taxes if your company can be seized by whatever faction is in power?

And Russian weapons? US military equipment has been turning Russian military equipment into scrap metal for decades on battlefields around the world. Once our missile defense system is up and running, Russia's final military asset, it's ICBM's, will be just as worthless.

88 posted on 07/06/2005 8:03:59 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

We don't have allot of friends in the world now days. I think the Russians try to keep us busy on the world stage.

They don't seem to be concerned at all about rogue states gaining nuclear technology, that's always puzzled me. They have had their own radical islamic problems for years. Go figure.


89 posted on 07/06/2005 8:07:53 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Is Iran intending to slog it out with India in the Arabian Sea?

A shia Iran hates the sunni muslim world. India has maintained decent relations with Iran for their oil and ofcourse due to Pakistan. (Some secret agreement is rumoured that India has landing rights in Iran incase of war with Pak)

Other than that it will be stupid of Iran to challenge Indian in the Indian Ocean. In the Indian Ocean, after USN, IN stands tall. The rest hardly have any presence.
90 posted on 07/06/2005 9:13:47 PM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Just musing.....

Iran is the death enemy of Israel. Do those subs and missles threaten Israel? Yes, they do. Israel is within range of the missles, maybe after a little sail time.

Iran is moving closer and closer to nuclear weapons. When, lo and behold, this is learned, what happens then?

Iran is basically handcuffed. Israel has nukes and will retaliate if attacked, with full atomic support from us.
We'd love it if Iran provided enough provocation for us to take out their nuke sites. Israel wouldn't tolerate any provocation from Iran. We've sent J-Dams to Israel, and they have their own nukes. Besides, Israel did that before, to Iraq.

We also know that Iran is backing Muslim terrorists we fight in Iraq, and has backed past major terrorist attacks against us.

There's probably more, but Iran might be a little further out on thin ice than it thinks. (Iran/think...Does that sound oxymoronic?)

Iran could be a stalemate in the region for a long time. I don't think Iran will act, because of swift retaliation from several sides. The only way Iran could be aggressive militarily would involve allying with another major power that could deter others (us) from stepping in.

It does seem to me, however, that Iran's backing of terrorism might cause its sub fleet to suffer from mysterious (and violent)dissappearances. :D


91 posted on 07/07/2005 2:55:13 AM PDT by Randy Papadoo (Hey! That's NOT YOUR COOKIE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
What the heck is wrong with those Russians

NEWSFLASH! The Cold War never ended. It's just being fought by proxy for now. They need our capital and technology to rebuild for their next blitz. Communists are stubborn and pragmatic.

92 posted on 07/07/2005 6:34:19 AM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

See my post #92.


93 posted on 07/07/2005 6:48:30 AM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Putin? Underhanded? Perish the thought. Why he's a fine upstanding....Hey anybody seen my Super Bowl ring?


94 posted on 07/07/2005 8:54:51 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jb6; Lion in Winter; GarySpFc; Tailgunner Joe; Lukasz; anticommunist8; lizol

This appears to be a very tough row to hoe for our Kremlinphiles.



95 posted on 07/07/2005 9:51:17 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Wow - Putie wasted no time making political hay out of the London blast.

He wants carte blanche in his sphere of influence. He's blaming the west for his problems in Chechnya.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/world/12076263.htm


96 posted on 07/07/2005 10:05:17 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Kremlinphiles just want to prevent Soros’s invasion, he want to destroy Islam in Iran. :P


97 posted on 07/07/2005 10:08:35 AM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Knock it off.


98 posted on 07/07/2005 11:32:47 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: spanalot
He wants carte blanche in his sphere of influence. He's blaming the west for his problems in Chechnya.

I have news for you. I have been telling the Russiophobes for a long time the Chechens are in with al-Qaeda. On Fox News Ambassador Mark Ginsberg stated today, "We have known for sometime the Chechen terrorists have been training al-Qaeda on how to attack mass transit systems."
99 posted on 07/07/2005 11:44:34 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Randi Papadoo
Yep, but in due time. Those subs and those missles are crap. 200km range....pfffftt!

These missiles and subs are no threat to our navy ships.
100 posted on 07/07/2005 11:52:56 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson