Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sandbar
Really? How does it harm a child to take innocent photographs of a naked child in all it's beauty?

Legally speaking, nude pictures of kids aren't per se kiddie porn. There needs to be a sexual aspect.

Child porn isn't just child sex photos, but naked photos of children.

Legally speaking? No. Otherwise, anyone who ever took a picture of their toddler in the bathtub would be a child pornographer.

47 posted on 07/06/2005 11:32:43 AM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman

>>>Legally speaking? No. Otherwise, anyone who ever took a picture of their toddler in the bathtub would be a child pornographer.>>>

Ask the woman who was arrested for taking photo's of her daughter (three years old) in the bathtub.


49 posted on 07/06/2005 12:41:30 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson