Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain promises war over Supreme Court
Drudge Report ^ | 07/12/2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 07/12/2005 11:02:02 AM PDT by Imani

Sen. McCain [R-AZ] Strong Words On Supreme Ct Nomination at Dallas Fundraiser: 'During the campaign, President Bush said he will appoint judges who will strictly interpret the constitution... thinking anything else is either amnesia or ignorance... elections have consequences... whomever he nominates deserves an up or down vote and no filibuster... and an up or down vote is what we will have'...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibuster; johnmccain2008; judicialnominees; mandate; mccain; nuclear; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-273 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin
Well, this is surprising.

Only if you think McPainInTheAss is going to change his rinoantic ways...

I don't believe he's capable of that change at all!!

He sure loves to play media attentive politics doesn't he?

142 posted on 07/12/2005 2:52:11 PM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Yes, this is very same weasel that prevented the filibuster from being broken.

If people want to follow McMaverick off a cliff like sheep because he says what they want to hear than I don't ever want to hear them complain when they look up in shock at the blood dripping from the knife he puts in their back. And to think, some of these people make fun of Americans voting for a man (Clinton) that said what they wanted to hear. As long as the person has an "R" by their name I guess that lack of character is excused.

McCain blew it when he sabotaged the deal. he is not to be trusted. IF he does the right thing NOW, it'll only be to attempt to claim credit. It's dirty politics at the expense of principle, collegues and Party. It isn't to be applauded.

he'll never have my vote no matter what circumstance...but I'm not opposed to using him to end this filibuster, then ditching him afterwards.


143 posted on 07/12/2005 2:55:47 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You are seriously kidding yourselves if you think the RINOs in the Senate will stand by a conservative nominee and fight.

I hope I'm wrong, but the conservatives couldn't even get the UN post filled with Bush's nominee.

Do we honestly believe that DeWine, Hagel, McCain, Voinovich (Not to mention the girls, Snowe, Chafee et al.) and the other dozens of RINOs are going to stand with President Bush once the MSM smear machine gets rolling?
This will be Bork II.

I suspect Bush will cave with a Gonzalas or some other "consensus" candidate to fill O'Connor's shoes, and state that she was a moderate, a conservative will replace a conservative opening.

But even if Bush nominates a "true" conservative, it still needs to get 51 votes, 60 if there is a filibuster.

And by my counting, there are too may RINOs in the Senate to guarantee any seat going automatically to a conservative.


144 posted on 07/12/2005 2:59:24 PM PDT by wrathof59 ("to the Everlasting Glory of the Infantry".........Robert A Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

...We'll see, actions speak louder than words....

Yes they do, and this statement conflicts with his "action" on the deal he cut with the dems over the fillibuster.

But like you said, we'll see.


145 posted on 07/12/2005 3:01:21 PM PDT by planekT (The Supreme Can of Worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Imani

146 posted on 07/12/2005 3:03:40 PM PDT by Nascardude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imani

Did McCain do a poll?


147 posted on 07/12/2005 3:07:59 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Is McCain drinking again?


148 posted on 07/12/2005 3:15:09 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
McCain's on our side, today.

Today isn't over yet.

149 posted on 07/12/2005 3:18:22 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Imani
So... 'Ya think McCain's trustworthy?

He'll sell us out at the first opportunity.

150 posted on 07/12/2005 3:24:16 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That's my point, if conservatives are counting on the likes of a McCain to place a conservative justice, then we are starting in a deep, deep hole.


151 posted on 07/12/2005 3:29:57 PM PDT by wrathof59 ("to the Everlasting Glory of the Infantry".........Robert A Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

that's total rubbish.


so in 2008, there will be only 6-7 justices on the SCOTUS? I'll take that bet and you'll be very poor


152 posted on 07/12/2005 3:31:35 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

Couldn't the Republicans in the Senate filibuster the Hillary Clinton nominations if she picks liberal wackos?


153 posted on 07/12/2005 3:37:29 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Yeah, sure. Whatever you say, MeCain. Just don't expect us to believe you.


154 posted on 07/12/2005 3:49:54 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Imani

Did he happen to say which side he'd support in a floor vote?


155 posted on 07/12/2005 3:50:07 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("What kind of a people do they think we are?" - Winston Churchill to Congress, December 1941)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

"Couldn't the Republicans in the Senate filibuster the Hillary Clinton nominations if she picks liberal wackos?"

Yep, they sure could. Would they? And would they stick to it? Don't make me laugh.


156 posted on 07/12/2005 3:51:12 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

BUSH IS A WHIMP HE WILL DO A RODNEY KING


157 posted on 07/12/2005 3:53:04 PM PDT by deathb4dishoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: katana

We give McCain a lot of grief but he is decidely pro-life, and that will help us here. Democrats are going to look like the jerks they are for stonewalling and McCain will do a good job of making them look that way -- he is, after all, perceived to be very "fair"


158 posted on 07/12/2005 3:54:02 PM PDT by hawaiian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian

Doesn't matter. What matters is that McCain has a long, long track record of being manipulated by liberals and of going along with them. I don't care what he thinks about abortion if he's not a fighter who will STAND with us.


159 posted on 07/12/2005 3:56:37 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Imani

McKook tries to redeem himself. Big deal.


160 posted on 07/12/2005 3:58:25 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson