Skip to comments.Freeper Thoughts on the Plame Kerfuffle
Posted on 07/12/2005 6:55:21 PM PDT by RightFighter
I'm wondering who everyone thinks the actual leaker is. Remember that Novak stated that it's not who we think it is and that it's a highly placed government official who is "no partisan gunslinger".
My gut tells me this is what happened:
Cooper calls Rove about welfare reform. At the end of the conversation, he asks Rove about Wilson. Rove tries to warn him off the story, mentioning that Wilson's wife, who apparently works at CIA, arranged for Wilson to go to Niger.
Miller catches wind of this conversation, perhaps through a conversation with Cooper or perhaps she asked Rove a similar question. Anyway, Miller wants to confirm this portion of the story, so she does some digging to find out the NAME of Wilson's wife.
The key question then, is, who does Miller call to get the name?
My guess is George Tenet. He would have certainly known the name. He was definitely a highly placed government official, and he certainly would not be considered a partisan gunslinger, having worked as CIA Director under both Presidents Clinton and Bush. Plame had been working in Washington during Tenet's entire tenure at CIA I think, so it's certainly possible that he didn't think that she could possibly be considered covert, so he didn't think he was doing any harm by revealing her name.
This would also explain the NYT stance on this whole matter. They would rather see Rove twist in the wind while their reporter-ette sits in a country club saying nothing than they would like to see the truth come out. The truth in this case would totally exonerate the administration and cast the blame on a CLINTON appointee!!!
There may be nothing to this, but take note of this post, because it may be one that you go looking for in a couple of months to say "didn't that guy RightFighter post Tenet's name on FR a while back?"
This is from Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame:
21 July 2003: Newsday article "Columnist Names CIA Iraq Operative" by Timothy M. Phelps and Knut Royce attributes intelligence information independently leaked to them about Plame as coming from "intelligence officials" and a "senior intelligence official." . Both have been subpoenaed in the Plame investigation.
Interestingly, I noticed this on Wikipedia too. I didn't realize that Wiki was biased, but I guess this proves it:
July 11, 2005: Rove's lawyer/paid liar says, "Rove did not mention her name to Cooper." This one might actually be true, in its lie-y way.
Richard Clarke...former terrorist czar.
Much ado about nothing.
But if Miller goes to jail then the public perception among those only sorta paying attention becomes "Wow, this must be a big deal."
Read York's article in National Review on this. It's very telling.
Wilson himself. He had his wife's name and CIA status right on his own website. It was for every one in cyberspace to see. It was long before the Rove e-mail.
This was reported today on FOX - It was on "The Big Story" with John Gibson.
Non story being beaten to death by the lib media because they're still sore about Gore.
Well that would explain your article from earlier this evening. Very insightful, I might add.
However, Miller herself as the leaker doesn't fit with Novak's assertion that it was a senior administration official.
It was on FOX today!!! It was Wilson!!
I believe it was Joe Wilson myself. Where has he been lately? Question, did anyone see Lou Dobbs talk to John Dean tonite? Disgusting.
I think Wilson is probably Miller's source. Her name was freely available on his website. Or so I've heard.
If he was claiming to have been sent by the administration, Miller/The NY TIMEs, would have felt they could get away with calling him a highly placed administration insider.
Without a doubt it was Wilson. What I can't figure out is why anyone would think Karl Rove would give Cooper permission to disclose that he was the leaker? If I were Rove, I would come out and say "I did not have sex with that woman, Valerie Plame" and leave it at that.
Novak cooperated with the investigators to avoid big doo-doo, but he's keeping mum 'til the investigation's over and all the cards are on the table (probably a condition of his grand jury testimony).
I've seen a couple of names that came to my mind: Richie Clarke (doubtful) and Wilson hisself (probably).
Colonel Mustard, in the conservatory, with a hunk of pipe.
I dont think you can say without a doubt it was Wilson, unless you have some knowledge, we dont.
Im just waiting till the prosecutor has finished with the case and then we will know.
I can't be bothered until the press gets excited about Sandy Berger. ;)
Judith Miller reported on WMD issues. Plame worked in a CIA department that specialized in WMD issues. Chances are pretty good that they knew each other.
At the very least, she would have known Plame's boss -- Alan Foley (who retired without warning a month after the balloon went up and ranks high on the list of suspects as one of Novak's two sources).
Nobody but RABID DEMO LIBERAL JOURNALISTS care who the leaker is for a CIA File Clerk.
No, but what I mean was... I thought NOVAK'S article was the first one to "out" Plame. Am I wrong? I just can't remember anymore.
I am just wondering who photographed the Kerfuffle, and can anyone identify it as Plame's.
The only person Miller is worth sitting in jail for is Wilson
Anybody else could be "spun" by the media. It has to be Wilson
How stupid would the NYT look if it was revealed Wilson was the leak.
Was it the New York Times? His publisher? The American taxpayer? THAT IS THE QUESTION I'D LIKE TO SEE ANSWERED.
The only people buying into this non-story are the libs that so desperately want to believe they have a smoking gun.
The right wages a war on terrorism to earn a safer world, the left wages a war on futility to gain political power.
Thank GOD the Gore and Kerry lost.
I think the entire concept of a "leaker" is flawed. It is the media and the Wilson's which have sold this smoke screen to cover the real breach of federal regulations nepotism.
The fact is that revealing who sponsored Joe Wilson for the Africa trip was only relevant because it was a violation of the law. The fact that Joe had gone public with lies about classified CIA reports is not only against the law it is treason.
The rest is a carefully constructed smoke screen to cover for the real criminals ( The Wilson's) and to use as a political club against the Bush Administration.
And I think we need to write letters and call the Congress and the media and demand accountability.
What better way to get "outed" than let a very poorly guarded secret slip by talking to a Times reporter? After all, she does qualify as a "high administration official", if you stretch the administration tie.
Now that the whole world knows who she is, she can write a best seller describing her exploits when she was really a covert agent.
Of course, if she's revealed as the leaker, the house of cards comes tumbling down, crushing the Times under the rubble.
Remember, you heard it here first....
Rove gave Cooper the OK to say anything he wanted. Rove knew he didn't do anything wrong. Cooper never claimed Rove was a "leaker," just that he talked to him about "Joe's wife" via an e-mail. Rove never gave her name, but people already knew it anyway. Wilson had it on his website - complete with her CIA status. It was there for the world to see!
it was CIA-sponsored. They're te ones that called for the trip in the first place
I agree with you. Additionally, I think Ms.Miller is trying to stall to try to find out what the special prosecutor and grand jury knows. But this just is not leaking, so she is in a world of hurt. If she lies in the grand jury the SP will know and prosecute her for perjury and obstruction. If she tell the truth that the sequence is from Plame (or Wilson) to Miller to another media person, then she is guilty of what the NYT alledged against Rove and the White House. Either way, Bush/Rove wins. The only crime to be prosecuted is the one Miller is about to commit.
Wilson's article appeared on July 6th, 2003. Novak's article appeared on July 14th. The Justice Dept. opened up their leak investigation the end of September, but the revelation of the Cooper-Rove phone call of July 11th, 2003 didn't come to light until just now. So how, on the 21st of August 2003, did Joe Wilson know to blame Rove for the leak? It was on that date, at a forum on intelligence failures in Iraq, that Wilson stated:
"It's of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs. And trust me, when I use that name, I measure my words."
It's obvious from this comment that Wilson had it in for Rove. And his statement of having a "keen interest...to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs," sounds almost as if it was a plan that was in the works.
The real question that needs to be asked is which reporter did Wilson talk to and when? Was it Cooper, Miller or Novak...or was it all three? Before his August 21st comments, which reporter told Wilson about their phone conversation with Rove? There has to be a connection in all of this between Wilson and one or more of those reporters. I can't see why Wilson would have brought Rove's name up on August 21st, unless he had been fueled with info from one of these individuals. Perhaps Wilson saw it as a chance to squelch Bush's reelection if he could get Rove out of the picture. And what better way to do it than to create a scandal where none existed and point the finger at the man who was in charge of getting Dubya relected.
Or as my then 4 year old son yelled out when we were playing "Clue" years ago: "It was Mr. Green Jeans with the lead pipe...up his hiney!"
Don't ask me where he got that one from.
A big question I have right now is WHY the person who "leaked" to Miller won't step forward? That person has allegedly given Miller a general waiver, freeing her to name him/her as her source before the grand jury. Miller claims to believe that the waiver was coerced by the special prosecutor, and she therefore claims that she doesn't trust that her source actually wants to be named.
I think Miller is a liar. I do not believe for a second that she is protecting a "source" - - I believe that she is protecting her employer (the NY Times) and her party from a major embarrassment.
I don't think it matters at all. There was no "leak" mainly because there was no secret. According to Novak, pretty much everybody in the DC party circuit knew that Valerie worked for the CIA.
Yes, she'd once been undercover, but after she was outed by Ames to the Russians in about 93 or 94 she was useless (and not safe) as a covert operator anymore, and they brought her home way back then where she worked an admin position.
There was nothing to leak.
Plame's boss Alan Foley should have retired waaaaaaaay before he did. Just suffered through reading transcript on testimony he gave re John Bolton. The guy could barely recall his own name - much less anything else. The whole time I'm thinking "this guy was CIA????"
VALERIE PLAME, of all people, HAS BEEN GIVEN A COMPLETE PASS in all of this, and I don't know why. It is my contention that Valerie Plame is the ultimate scumbag in this whole disgraceful fiasco.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.