Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat partisanship disguised as moral outrage
Liberty Call US Deck Log ^ | July 13, 2005 | Liberty

Posted on 07/13/2005 8:53:28 AM PDT by Gunner9mm

Democrat partisanship disguised as moral outrage

Yes, I know, “Democrat partisanship” is redundant. Nonetheless, the Democrats are in high dungeon since investigators have released an email showing that Karl Rove possibly, might have, allegedly done something that, if the Democrats keep saying so, if they can stretch the law far enough, might, just might be a violation of the law. The rumor is that in 2003 Rove allegedly “leaked” the name of a “CIA Operative” to some reporters, thereby maybe putting said “Operative”, a “warrior on the front lines of the War on Terror” in danger. Consequently, Karl Rove must either resign, or the president must fire him. Of course, the email proves no such thing, but that is no impediment to the liberal Democrats who are out for blood.

"[T]he truth is Rove betrayed the identity of an undercover officer fighting on the front lines in the war on terror. These actions are particularly egregious in a time of war," said Howard Dean, DNC Chairman.

Read the rest of the story at Liberty Call US.

(Excerpt) Read more at libertycall.us ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; karlrove; phonyoutrage; plame

1 posted on 07/13/2005 8:53:31 AM PDT by Gunner9mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm

In order to have moral outrage, one must first have morals.

This point alone exposes the Dimocrat blather as simple partisanship.


2 posted on 07/13/2005 8:57:41 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
Since when did the Democrats become co concerned about National security. The Red Chinese acquired a butt load of critical information during the Clinton administration and the Democrat never said a stinking word.
3 posted on 07/13/2005 8:57:45 AM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm

How many Soldiers and operatives lives have been endangered by Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, Dick Durbin, Barbara Boxer, John Kerry and the rest of the Dem party? How many of our enemies are emboldened by their Sedition? Let's count..........................


4 posted on 07/13/2005 8:59:00 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

That was may thought too. I'm still laughing in derision at the thought that demoncRATS like Hitlery, Bubba, Reddy Teddy, Kleagle Byrd, etc. would be likened to anything moral even if it's outrage.


5 posted on 07/13/2005 8:59:29 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
I think the words and actions of Dr. Demento (Howie Dean) in a time of war are particularly egregious!!

As a matter of fact, I find Howie Dean to be particularly egregious, if not obnoxious!!
6 posted on 07/13/2005 9:00:05 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm

Just goes to show, this would have never happened if we'd have let the Democrats just do away with the CIA when they wanted to.


7 posted on 07/13/2005 9:00:09 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

The gig is up, no one cares what the dems say anymore.

Rove is a hero for exposing the lies of a traitor. He should be given a medal.


8 posted on 07/13/2005 9:08:55 AM PDT by republican2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
Last night on O'Reily Newt Gingrich said the source of Rove's information about Wilson's wife was not anyone in the federal goverment.. it was the Time Magazine reporter.

I could not imagine Rove revealing illegal information in any way that could be attributed to him.

But he did.

But if the source of that information is a media reporter, then that can not in any way be a crime.

Novak at first said his source was a high level administration official, then backtracked... why?? What if Rove had simply told Novak.. "Time magazine has uncovered some interesting information about how Wilson got his job.. Why don't you go talk to the time magazine reporter.. If Time decides not to break the story ... perhaps you can."

If Rove then told the New York Times reporter what the Time Magazine reporter had told him.... with out telling the New York Times who his source was, The New York Times would be in the position of demanding a Special Prosecutor whose main task may be to prosecute people at Time Magazine.

The most important factor is the Special Prosecutor saying Rove is not a target. The only way that could be true is if Rove's source of the information was the media.. and not a goverment employee or document.

If it turns out the Time Magazine reporter was the source for Rove, and Novak, and Rove just passed on the story to the New York Times, the times may very will have been outsmarted. The Special Prosecutor in open court refered to the New York times reporter as a person guilty of criminal behavior and criminal acts.

When a special prosecuter says a person is guilty of criminal behavior and criminal acts the odds are very high that person is going to be indicted.

Time will tell!!!


9 posted on 07/13/2005 9:10:18 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
""[T]he truth is Rove betrayed the identity of an undercover officer fighting on the front lines in the war on terror. These actions are particularly egregious in a time of war," said Howard Dean, DNC Chairman."

The truth is, that's a downright LIE. Democrats hope that if they repeat a lie often enough it will become truth. When the truth does come out, Where will the Democrats "outrage" be when it's one of their own?

10 posted on 07/13/2005 9:11:27 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

You need to take a look at John Podhoretz' column of 7/12.

He lays out in detail the several previous occasions on which V. Plame was "outed."

You cannot be guilty of revealing the identity of a CIA employee whose identity is already common knowledge.


11 posted on 07/13/2005 9:15:40 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Lest we forget the Sandy Burgler affair, too. I don't recall a great hue and cry over destruction of information pertaining to 9/11.

Democratic howls of righteous indignation are laughable on there face.


12 posted on 07/13/2005 9:20:15 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("Damn the torpedoes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: republican2005
In the end I'll bet you that Rove isn't wasn't involved.

At that point you will hear the Dems whining that they fell for the old Rove "bait and switch" - they tried the same thing during Dan Rather's "memogate"; "We were set up by the omniscient and crafty Rove! He should have completely denied involvement the first time that we wrongly accused him!"
13 posted on 07/13/2005 9:29:21 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("The Marx Brothers have nothing on the Marxists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
Nonetheless, the Democrats are in high dungeon

I was in a high dungeon once. Being there certainly put me in a state of high dugeon.
14 posted on 07/13/2005 9:45:11 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Being there certainly put me in a state of high dugeon

Crap, I can't even mock properly any more! It's dudgeon...
15 posted on 07/13/2005 9:46:12 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Cool...

CA....


16 posted on 07/13/2005 10:04:45 AM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm

Plame is a desk jockey.


17 posted on 07/13/2005 11:34:37 AM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson