Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leak? What Leak?
http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/126 ^

Posted on 07/13/2005 8:21:43 PM PDT by kcvl

Leak? What Leak?

Submitted by editor on July 13, 2005 - 12:12pm.

By Howard Kurtz Source: Washington Post

From the moment the Karl Rove story exploded over the weekend, I've been intensely curious as to what tack the conservatives would take.

This is a big political embarrassment, no question about it, and while Scott McClellan could try the old can't-comment-during-the-investigation (though he had earlier denied any Rove involvement during the same investigation), what would the denizens of the right do?

I tuned into O'Reilly and Hannity on Monday night, but there was no mention, none, of the Rove/Plame affair. Imagine if an e-mail had surfaced showing that a top aide to Clinton--say, Sid Blumenthal--had told a reporter about a covert CIA agent. Would those Fox shows have given the controversy a bit of air time? (Last night, O'Reilly said "some in the media are foaming" over the story but did call on Rove to "clear the air," then hosted Newt Gingrich, who attacked Joe Wilson. Hannity said Rove "wasn't on a witchhunt" because Matt Cooper called him , and guest G. Gordon Liddy ripped Cooper and said Valerie Plame wasn't really undercover. At least the show had a liberal guest, Bill Press, who got overheated in accusing Rove of "treason" and saying he "should be marched off to prison." No trial, Bill?)

(Excerpt) Read more at mediachannel.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; plamenameblamegame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2005 8:21:44 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Just a tad slanted, ya think?


2 posted on 07/13/2005 8:23:41 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
And 2) Rove was just performing a public service by steering a reporter away from a false story. (Actually, Wilson was right about the bogus Niger uranium tale, and the White House was wrong, although his credibility did take a hit from a critical Senate intelligence committee report.)

Hmmm

3 posted on 07/13/2005 8:26:43 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

I think the CIA agent outed HERSELF.

How 'bout them apples?


4 posted on 07/13/2005 8:28:12 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (Writing from Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Imagine what would have happened if some high level Clinton administration official was caught stuffing secret documents into their pants......wait.....that happened and all we heard was.....crickets.


5 posted on 07/13/2005 8:28:19 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Actually a top Clinton aide, Sandy Berger, did commit a felony recently and whatever became of that???


6 posted on 07/13/2005 8:30:36 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Embarrassed? Let's see if I have this right: Bush says Saddam tried to buy uranium from somewhere in Africa (never said Niger.) Wilson goes to Niger for a few days and comes back and says he couldn't find any evidence of that (apparently no memos were left by the hotel pool.) He tries to give the impression Cheney sent him but actually his research/analyst CIA wife sent him. And Rove knew it and said so.

And WE'RE supposed to be embarrassed? My new definition of a liberal is someone who is too dumb to know when they should be mortified.

7 posted on 07/13/2005 8:31:05 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

You need to keep current dude, the yellow cake story WAS true....You didn't hear, it's months old....


8 posted on 07/13/2005 8:31:15 PM PDT by crowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

And also imagine, if you will, if a former Time and NY Times editor wrote a book about Hillary Clinton that was number two on the Times best-seller list, yet could not get any air or ink for his effort. Just imagine (cue John Lennon.)


9 posted on 07/13/2005 8:31:17 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

EXACTLY!


Imagine if President Bush was accused of raping a woman and ONE reporter asked ONE question about it and then dropped it and the others IGNORED IT completely?!


10 posted on 07/13/2005 8:31:42 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

Wasn't she an ANALYST ,,not an agent ???


11 posted on 07/13/2005 8:33:03 PM PDT by crowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999; God luvs America

The Clinton administration - The gift that keeps on giving...


12 posted on 07/13/2005 8:35:33 PM PDT by Humidston (Hillary's Full Name - EVITA PEYRONie's CLINTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

I know Kurtz aint complaining bout people ignoring a story...its like Paris Hilton calling you loose


13 posted on 07/13/2005 8:37:03 PM PDT by skaterboy (Me love you long time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crowman

The Brits stand by the Yellow Cake Story.


14 posted on 07/13/2005 8:37:21 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Senate Intelligence Committee Report...


http://web.mit.edu/simsong/www/iraqreport2-textunder.pdf




found in its recent report on pre-war Iraq intelligence that Plame "offered up" her husband's name as a potential fact-finder in the trip to Niger. Indeed, as columnist Robert Novak -- who was the first journalist to write a story detailing Plame and her job -- reports, the Senate Intelligence Committee report states that Plame wrote a memo to her superiors in the CIA stating that "my husband has good relations with both the [Nigerian] PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity." Additionally, there was a State Department meeting in 2002 that, according to the Senate Intelligence Committee, was "apparently convened by [Wilson's] wife who had the idea to dispatch [him] to use his contacts to sort out the Iraq-Niger uranium issue."




Moreover, the Senate Intelligence Committee's found that Wilson's findings "did not refute the possibility that Iraq had approached Niger to purchase uranium." Writing separately from the full committee report, committee chairman Senator Pat Roberts wrote that:



"Time and again, Joe Wilson told anyone who would listen that the President had lied to the American people, that the Vice President had lied, and that he had 'debunked' the claim that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa . . . [N]ot only did he NOT 'debunk' the claim, he actually gave some intelligence analysts even more reason to believe that it may be true." (Emphasis mine.)



Chairman Roberts' claims are supported by the release of the Butler Report in Great Britain. The Butler Report paid special attention to the 16 words in President Bush's 2003 State of the Union, because while the White House eventually backed away from the 16 word claim and said that it should not have found its way in the speech, the British refused to back away from their finding that Saddam Hussein sought quantities of uranium from Africa. As the summary of the Butler Report reveals, the British were right to stick to their guns:



"We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the time, covering both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa in the government's dossier, and by extension the prime minister in the House of Commons, were well founded. By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bush's state of the union address of 2003 that 'the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa' was well founded." (Emphasis mine.)



http://tinyurl.com/8m5be


15 posted on 07/13/2005 8:39:04 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
He tries to give the impression Cheney sent him but actually his research/analyst CIA wife sent him.

Rep. Harold Ford (D-TN) said, on Imus, that Wilson was a patriot in the past and is a patriot now. Imus didn't disagree.

In my mind Wilson is scum.

16 posted on 07/13/2005 8:43:04 PM PDT by syriacus (Did one of Michael's girlfriends have a key to Terri's apartment? Did Lazy Bones McCabe ask anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

YEP, what is this guy talking about?


17 posted on 07/13/2005 8:43:05 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
When we look back and recall Wilson's claim that "Neo-conservatives and religious conservatives have hijacked this administration, and I consider myself on a personal mission to destroy both," we see that Wilson's motives and credibility should have been suspect from the outset. Wilson's many lies are well-documented by The Weekly Standard's Matthew Continetti...

snip

the key accusations made by Joe Wilson and his backers have almost completely fallen apart. Maybe the next time we decide to send someone on an important overseas fact-finding mission, we will be fortunate enough to get a fact-finder more honest and competent than Wilson appears to have been. That way, our intelligence-gathering will be better, national security principals will be able to make more informed decisions, and we will be spared the kind of lies and misinformation that Joe Wilson has spent so much time peddling, and the nation has spent so much valuable time investigating.

http://tinyurl.com/8m5be

18 posted on 07/13/2005 8:43:24 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Actually, Joey was WRONG about the "bogus Niger yellow cake tale." The Brits and the 911 Commission still insist there is credibility to the "tale." Ya gotta get with the program Howie if you want to stay credible in YOUR profession. It is your boy Joey that is doing all the lying. And please don't presume that Plame was a covert undercover spook just because you read it in your newspapers. From what I've read, she was pushing papers at CIA HQ. One question that Joey needs to be asked is where his wife was working when this so-called "leak" occurred and where was she working 5 years prior to that. But that question will never be asked. Not by the Commie 'RATS anyway.


19 posted on 07/13/2005 8:46:17 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
(Actually, Wilson was right about the bogus Niger uranium tale, and the White House was wrong, although his credibility did take a hit from a critical Senate intelligence committee report.)

Kurtz doesn't appear to be paying attention, does he?

At the same time, he's missing what should be the biggest story in this entire Rove/Plame flap: Media Hysteria.

20 posted on 07/13/2005 8:47:03 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I know thats how far I got into the article and I had to stop. I knew he must be some kind of liberal hack.
21 posted on 07/13/2005 8:49:31 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
(Actually, Wilson was right about the bogus Niger uranium tale, and the White House was wrong, although his credibility did take a hit from a critical Senate intelligence committee report.)

OK, let's say Slugger Jones hits a homerun over the left field fence. I want to get that baseball so I can get Slugger's autograph on it and sell it on e-bay. So I proceed to look for the baseball in the stands behind home plate. Meanwhile, another fan looks for the ball behind the left field fence and finds it. I then accuse the other fan that found the ball of cheating because I didn't find it.

Oooooookay.

22 posted on 07/13/2005 8:55:23 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randog

I didn't know liberals were still defending Wilson.


23 posted on 07/13/2005 8:58:21 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

The left still has a comprehension problem. Rove did not leak the name of anyone but of course they wish to pretend he did and as for the Clinton White House we didn't have to make up scandle, it came straight from the source and forceful and bold.


24 posted on 07/13/2005 9:06:46 PM PDT by Ma3lst0rm (Alot of Smoke but where is the fire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Is it just me noticing this or is the left completely incapable of reading a news item and gleaning the facts without attaching their hopes and biases on every point?


25 posted on 07/13/2005 9:06:46 PM PDT by GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos (Peace on earth! After major whup-a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
I didn't know liberals were still defending Wilson.

They have to--he's the key to their "Bush Lied, People Died" mantra. Wilson is the dupe looking for the ball behind home plate in my little analogy. The British government is the fan that found the ball (the Brits stand by their story that Saddam bought uranium from Niger).

It even goes deeper than that. It's beginning to look like Wilson was just the point man in an effort to discredit Bush in his effort to go to war with Iraq. If Wilson goes down then a lot of rats follow him.

26 posted on 07/13/2005 9:08:05 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kcvl



WSJ.com OpinionJournal

Karl Rove, Whistleblower
He told the truth about Joe Wilson.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:01 a.m.

Democrats and most of the Beltway press corps are baying for Karl Rove's head over his role in exposing a case of CIA nepotism involving Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame. On the contrary, we'd say the White House political guru deserves a prize--perhaps the next iteration of the "Truth-Telling" award that The Nation magazine bestowed upon Mr. Wilson before the Senate Intelligence Committee exposed him as a fraud.

For Mr. Rove is turning out to be the real "whistleblower" in this whole sorry pseudo-scandal. He's the one who warned Time's Matthew Cooper and other reporters to be wary of Mr. Wilson's credibility. He's the one who told the press the truth that Mr. Wilson had been recommended for the CIA consulting gig by his wife, not by Vice President Dick Cheney as Mr. Wilson was asserting on the airwaves. In short, Mr. Rove provided important background so Americans could understand that Mr. Wilson wasn't a whistleblower but was a partisan trying to discredit the Iraq War in an election campaign. Thank you, Mr. Rove.

Media chants aside, there's no evidence that Mr. Rove broke any laws in telling reporters that Ms. Plame may have played a role in her husband's selection for a 2002 mission to investigate reports that Iraq was seeking uranium ore in Niger. To be prosecuted under the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act, Mr. Rove would had to have deliberately and maliciously exposed Ms. Plame knowing that she was an undercover agent and using information he'd obtained in an official capacity. But it appears Mr. Rove didn't even know Ms. Plame's name and had only heard about her work at Langley from other journalists.

On the "no underlying crime" point, moreover, no less than the New York Times and Washington Post now agree. So do the 36 major news organizations that filed a legal brief in March aimed at keeping Mr. Cooper and the New York Times's Judith Miller out of jail.

"While an investigation of the leak was justified, it is far from clear--at least on the public record--that a crime took place," the Post noted the other day. Granted the media have come a bit late to this understanding, and then only to protect their own, but the logic of their argument is that Mr. Rove did nothing wrong either.

The same can't be said for Mr. Wilson, who first "outed" himself as a CIA consultant in a melodramatic New York Times op-ed in July 2003. At the time he claimed to have thoroughly debunked the Iraq-Niger yellowcake uranium connection that President Bush had mentioned in his now famous "16 words" on the subject in that year's State of the Union address.

Mr. Wilson also vehemently denied it when columnist Robert Novak first reported that his wife had played a role in selecting him for the Niger mission. He promptly signed up as adviser to the Kerry campaign and was feted almost everywhere in the media, including repeat appearances on NBC's "Meet the Press" and a photo spread (with Valerie) in Vanity Fair.

But his day in the political sun was short-lived. The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report last July cited the note that Ms. Plame had sent recommending her husband for the Niger mission. "Interviews and documents provided to the Committee indicate that his wife, a CPD [Counterproliferation Division] employee, suggested his name for the trip," said the report.

The same bipartisan report also pointed out that the forged documents Mr. Wilson claimed to have discredited hadn't even entered intelligence channels until eight months after his trip. And it said the CIA interpreted the information he provided in his debrief as mildly supportive of the suspicion that Iraq had been seeking uranium in Niger.

About the same time, another inquiry headed by Britain's Lord Butler delivered its own verdict on the 16 words: "We conclude also that the statement in President Bush's State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that 'The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa' was well-founded."

In short, Joe Wilson hadn't told the truth about what he'd discovered in Africa, how he'd discovered it, what he'd told the CIA about it, or even why he was sent on the mission. The media and the Kerry campaign promptly abandoned him, though the former never did give as much prominence to his debunking as they did to his original accusations. But if anyone can remember another public figure so entirely and thoroughly discredited, let us know.

If there's any scandal at all here, it is that this entire episode has been allowed to waste so much government time and media attention, not to mention inspire a "special counsel" probe. The Bush Administration is also guilty on this count, since it went along with the appointment of prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in an election year in order to punt the issue down the road. But now Mr. Fitzgerald has become an unguided missile, holding reporters in contempt for not disclosing their sources even as it becomes clearer all the time that no underlying crime was at issue.

As for the press corps, rather than calling for Mr. Rove to be fired, they ought to be grateful to him for telling the truth.




27 posted on 07/13/2005 9:10:39 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
If Wilson goes down then a lot of rats follow him.

Probably why Kerry is try to distance himself from Wilson removing all ties to him from his website.

28 posted on 07/13/2005 9:11:19 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

The Kerry Campaign dropped him like a stone after the Senate Intelligence Report came out. This whole story would be history except that the media hates Rove and could never pass up a chance to do him in. The WH punted this one down the road during the campaign and now they're paying for it. Not a bad play considering they won the election.

I love how Plame's importance as a super-secret agent who looks good in sunglasses and scarf keeps increasing. If Joe Biden leaked this stuff, she'd be a cubicle monkey



29 posted on 07/13/2005 9:13:10 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I tuned into O'Reilly and Hannity on Monday night, but there was no mention, none, of the Rove/Plame affair.

This is just a flat out lie

Hannity and O'Reilly have BOTH expended a lot of time on this issue. Rush has also. Conservatives have been talking about it thoroughly.

The reason he lies.... because they have exposed that there is no law being broken..at least not by Karl Rove... and he wants to keep that theory alive.
30 posted on 07/13/2005 9:20:15 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
Exactly, I don't see how anyone who drives to a CIA office and works in there all the time and NOT in the field could be considered 1. Undercover or 2. Covert.
31 posted on 07/13/2005 9:22:06 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Who do you guys think Miller is protecting and when will she crack?

If it's a Democrat (Plame herself, please God), another Journo or her own butt, I think Rove will ride this one out and probably have a good laugh.

If it's another Bushie, this will probably suck.


32 posted on 07/13/2005 9:25:09 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

What was Berger's sentence? I don't recall a word about it in the media. . .Fox or elsewhere.


33 posted on 07/13/2005 9:29:51 PM PDT by used2BDem (Navy Vet (Navy Mom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Another thing that Kurtz is glossing over here is the literal truth of Bush's "16 words" that got this whole Wilson/Plame thing started. He said the British government believes Iraq sough to buy African Uranium. The British goverment did believe that and they still do (See Lord Butler).


34 posted on 07/13/2005 9:30:22 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
yep, I never understood the liberals attacking Bush for that. read this good summary and lots of facts here
35 posted on 07/13/2005 9:39:53 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
The reason [Kurtz] lies.... because they have exposed that there is no law being broken..at least not by Karl Rove... and he wants to keep that theory alive.

The reason Kurtz didn't hear or see any talk about Karl Rove is because all the talk was aimed at what has becomethe bigger story in this affair: barking moonbat media hysteria.

I guess Howie missed that part...

36 posted on 07/13/2005 9:48:37 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

I can't help it. I keep having this vision of Bush and the WH standing behind a huge elephant pit with a tarp over it, and they keep enticing the press and the moronic democrats to come a little closer, come a little closer. "What's that? We can't hear you, come a little closer." LOL. The WH plays chess while the democrats and their lapdog media insist on playing checkers.


37 posted on 07/13/2005 9:49:05 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: used2BDem
What was Berger's sentence? I don't recall a word about it in the media. . .Fox or elsewhere.

Berger's sentencing was delayed, until sometime in September. Nobody seems to know why.

38 posted on 07/13/2005 9:49:55 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos
Is it just me noticing this or is the left completely incapable of reading a news item and gleaning the facts without attaching their hopes and biases on every point?

You are not alone.

The big story is not: Rove "Outs" Plame.

The big story is: Barking Moonbat Media Hysteria Overtakes MSM.

39 posted on 07/13/2005 9:53:45 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: okie01
WHAT???? I had not heard THAT either! "Nobody seems to know why." WHY? Aren't these things a matter of public record?
40 posted on 07/13/2005 10:23:14 PM PDT by used2BDem (Navy Vet (Navy Mom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: used2BDem; okie01

The way I read it is the Judge is weighing the deal that was made and the crime committed and has an option to reject it outright or may go ahead and accept it and mete out punishment as recommended by the prosecutors or perform a variation of their own.


41 posted on 07/13/2005 10:31:11 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh, Dear Lord! What insanity!!


42 posted on 07/13/2005 10:34:28 PM PDT by used2BDem (Navy Vet (Navy Mom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

lmao.....thanks for the laugh.


43 posted on 07/13/2005 10:47:28 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos

It's not just you.........

Seeing those nasty reporters on TV, made me ill. John Roberts, David Gregory........and their nastiness do nothing but show the American people how biased they are.

Apparently, Dan Rather has a "super top secret" training camp somewhere. Since Rove ran them out of Texas, I'd guess Alexandria as their new home base.

Could someone check on the "frequency"?


44 posted on 07/13/2005 10:52:36 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

I wouldn't believe Harold said, his dear Uncle his up to his ankles in fraud.


45 posted on 07/13/2005 10:54:27 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: used2BDem

re the 'berglars' sentence:

I believe the hearing is delayed, but haven't heard hardly anything lately.

A $10,000 fine was mentioned a lot earlier. Seems like a loose-noose would be more appropiate!


46 posted on 07/13/2005 11:59:34 PM PDT by GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos (Peace on earth! After major whup-a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Shortstop7

I like your guess of Dan i'd(Rather)lie running a "terroreporterist" training camp...
er..... I mean a "super top secret" training camp!


47 posted on 07/14/2005 12:10:05 AM PDT by GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos (Peace on earth! After major whup-a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Humans leak.

48 posted on 07/14/2005 12:14:59 AM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

< (Actually, Wilson was right about the bogus Niger uranium tale, and the White House was wrong, although his credibility did take a hit from a critical Senate intelligence committee report.)

Once his credibility was "hit" the committee needed to pack its bags. After that how can anything he says be credible?

Even in a court case, jurors are instructed that if you feel someone has lied on one point, you can discount "anything" else they said.


49 posted on 07/14/2005 3:43:06 AM PDT by GOP_Proud (...when the Iraqi soldiers stand up, we will stand down...GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
According to this post at Calblog, the Kurtz piece downplays previous Washington Post stories on the Senate Intellegence Committee report that put doubt on Wilson's contentions, but more interestingly, the print version differs from the online version by omitting reference to the Senate report. Maybe it's an editing error, maybe not....
50 posted on 07/14/2005 5:51:17 AM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson