Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Selection Of Supreme Court Justices Is Top NAACP Priority (
atlanta world daily ^ | 7/14/05 | Hazel Trice Edney, NNPA Washington Correspondent July 14, 2005

Posted on 07/14/2005 8:28:15 PM PDT by bitt

WASHINGTON - NAACP Board Chairman Julian Bond says the nation's oldest civil rights group will be working to make sure the person who succeeds retiring United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Conner is not hostile to civil rights.

"There can be no issue of greater or more immediate importance than the upcoming confirmation battle, and we intend to be in the thick of the fight," Bond announced Sunday night at the opening session in Milwaukee. "One vote, for example, upheld affirmative action in higher education - and that vote belonged to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. It is imperative that her replacement exhibit similar independence of mind and character," Bond said.

In filling the first Supreme Court vacancy in 11 years, President Bush must choose between nominating an extremely conservative judge, as he has often done with lower picks, or a candidate likely to win easy Senate confirmation. In the past, Bush has made no secret that Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, the two most conservative members of the court, are his ideal justices.

But if he picks a Thomas-like candidate, he is likely to face stiff opposition.

"We will support any nominee who stands for justice and fair play, and oppose any who is hostile to civil rights and civil liberties," Bond said in Milwaukee.

"To date, the successful Bush nominees to the federal district courts are the most conservative of any recent president. On racial discrimination, the president's federal district judges score the lowest of any modern chief executive. The ideas they hold, the rulings they have made and their speeches place them in a dim and gloomy legal netherworld where few Americans wish to dwell."

After five years of excoriating criticism of the administration, including comparing Bush's policies to the "Taliban" and "Snake Oil", Bond showed no..

(Excerpt) Read more at zwire.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: julianbond; mentalcase; naacp; racist; scotus
...what is this guy Bond thinking?
1 posted on 07/14/2005 8:28:17 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bitt

Bond has personally had a hand in trying to ruin Missouri. He has cut education funds and taken away health benefits from working people who need it. He is one of the biggest mistakes yet.


2 posted on 07/14/2005 8:30:52 PM PDT by lets be fair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

"...what is this guy Bond thinking?"

That as long as he can keep african americans thinking that they need the NAACP, he'll have a job?


3 posted on 07/14/2005 8:31:44 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

As if we give a $hit.


4 posted on 07/14/2005 8:32:09 PM PDT by msf92497 (My brain is "twitchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

He is a loudmouth racist in the vein of jackson and sharpton. One of Gw's finest moments has been ignoring him and the naaclp.


5 posted on 07/14/2005 8:33:59 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I don't recall Julian bond's name on the ballot last November. Did Gus Hall retire? Who does this assclown think he is?


6 posted on 07/14/2005 8:40:33 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Maybe the NAACP should concentrate on a non-Republican/conservative-hate agenda.

Speaking of that, when is the IRS going to revoke this organization's tax-free status?

7 posted on 07/14/2005 8:45:50 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trajan88

Exactly, were they actually hoping to influence the president's appointment, they would have done well not to burn their bridges to the president. They did and thus have no way to really participate in the selection.


8 posted on 07/14/2005 8:54:01 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitt
...what is this guy Bond thinking?

Something along the lines of, "that cracker in the White House best not be thinkin' 'bout nominatin' some uncle tom."

9 posted on 07/14/2005 8:55:02 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lets be fair

Uh, the article is about Julian Bond, the black Marxist. You seem to be referring to Christopher ''Kit'' Bond, the Missouri senator, true?


10 posted on 07/14/2005 8:55:02 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Oh, I am sooooooo glad Bond is watching out. We need to help him outtttttt of any position where anyone would pay the least bit of attention to him.


11 posted on 07/14/2005 8:56:29 PM PDT by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lets be fair

I think you are talking about a different Bond. This is Julian. Are you talking about Christopher?


12 posted on 07/14/2005 9:15:23 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"We will support any nominee who stands for justice and fair play, and oppose any who is hostile to civil rights and civil liberties," Bond said in Milwaukee.

Good. In that case, I'm sure they'll get right behind Janice Rogers Brown, right?

13 posted on 07/15/2005 3:14:25 AM PDT by jmc813 ("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"One vote, for example, upheld affirmative action in higher education - and that vote belonged to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. It is imperative that her replacement exhibit similar independence of mind and character," Bond said.

I don't really need to comment on this, do I?

14 posted on 07/15/2005 3:19:32 AM PDT by THX 1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Exactly, were they actually hoping to influence the president's appointment, they would have done well not to burn their bridges to the president. They did and thus have no way to really participate in the selection.

Exactly, they have NO leverage whatsoever with the WH, which is entirely their fault. Bush reached out to them in 2000, and in return they threw him down the stairs. Ba$tards. So all Bond and Co. can do now is shoot their punk mouths wide open, they have NO say in this process.

15 posted on 07/15/2005 2:00:16 PM PDT by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson