Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnnyBbad
Yes, Srebrenica was never demilitarized. Put yourself in the shoes of a Bosnian cleansed from...

The important distinction inferred by "demilitarized" is that they are soldiers (heading into Srebrenica, thereby bolstering the security enjoyed by the murderous raiders) as opposed to civilians armed in self-defense.

The former created a threat to the surrounding farms and villages while the latter do not.

And I see one of the Muhammedan apologists has decided to identify himself to you. Yes, meeting such as he is your first look into the "Twilight Zone" as his postings have little to do with what occurs here on Planet Earth.

26 posted on 07/15/2005 11:38:59 AM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib

When it comes to the safe areas, both sides badly abused the concept. The Muslims didn't disarm while the Serbs pressed their offensive against Gorzade in 1994 and only backed off when they'd pushed the UN/NATO to the brink.
Not even the Serbs claim to have been responding to Muslim attacks there.

BTW is there any ping lists for the balkan threads I can get on?


27 posted on 07/15/2005 11:57:50 AM PDT by johnnyBbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson