Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

july 16, 1964--Barry Goldwater's Acceptance Speech
Arizona Historical Foundation

Posted on 07/16/2005 9:38:00 PM PDT by Taft in '52

Goldwater's 1964 Acceptance Speech

The following is the text of Barry Goldwater's 1964 speech at the 28th Republican National Convention, accepting the nomination for president. Provided by the Arizona Historical Foundation

To my good friend and great Republican, Dick Nixon, and your charming wife, Pat; my running mate and that wonderful Republican who has served us well for so long, Bill Miller and his wife, Stephanie; to Thurston Morton who has done such a commendable job in chairmaning this Convention; to Mr. Herbert Hoover, who I hope is watching; and to that great American and his wife, General and Mrs. Eisenhower; to my own wife, my family, and to all of my fellow Republicans here assembled, and Americans across this great Nation.

From this moment, united and determined, we will go forward together, dedicated to the ultimate and undeniable greatness of the whole man. Together we will win.

I accept your nomination with a deep sense of humility. I accept, too, the responsibility that goes with it, and I seek your continued help and your continued guidance. My fellow Republicans, our cause is too great for any man to feel worthy of it. Our task would be too great for any man, did he not have with him the heart and the hands of this great Republican Party, and I promise you tonight that every fiber of my being is consecrated to our cause; that nothing shall be lacking from the struggle that can be brought to it by enthusiasm, by devotion, and plain hard work. In this world no person, no party can guarantee anything, but what we can do and what we shall do is to deserve victory, and victory will be ours.

The good Lord raised this mighty Republic to be a home for the brave and to flourish as the land of the free-not to stagnate in the swampland of collectivism, not to cringe before the bully of communism.

Now, my fellow Americans, the tide has been running against freedom. Our people have followed false prophets. We must, and we shall, return to proven ways-- not because they are old, but because they are true. We must, and we shall, set the tide running again in the cause of freedom. And this party, with its every action, every word, every breath, and every heartbeat, has but a single resolve, and that is freedom - freedom made orderly for this nation by our constitutional government; freedom under a government limited by laws of nature and of nature's God; freedom - balanced so that liberty lacking order will not become the slavery of the prison cell; balanced so that liberty lacking order will not become the license of the mob and of the jungle.

Now, we Americans understand freedom. We have earned it, we have lived for it, and we have died for it. This Nation and its people are freedom's model in a searching world. We can be freedom's missionaries in a doubting world. But, ladies and gentlemen, first we must renew freedom's mission in our own hearts and in our own homes.

During four futile years, the administration which we shall replace has distorted and lost that faith. It has talked and talked and talked and talked the words of freedom. Now, failures cement the wall of shame in Berlin. Failures blot the sands of shame at the Bay of Pigs. Failures mark the slow death of freedom in Laos. Failures infest the jungles of Vietnam. And failures haunt the houses of our once great alliances and undermine the greatest bulwark ever erected by free nations - the NATO community. Failures proclaim lost leadership, obscure purpose, weakening wills, and the risk of inciting our sworn enemies to new aggressions and to new excesses. Because of this administration we are tonight a world divided - we are a Nation becalmed. We have lost the brisk pace of diversity and the genius of individual creativity. We are plodding at a pace set by centralized planning, red tape, rules without responsibility, and regimentation without recourse.

Rather than useful jobs in our country, people have been offered bureaucratic "make work," rather than moral leadership, they have been given bread and circuses, spectacles, and, yes, they have even been given scandals. Tonight there is violence in our streets, corruption in our highest offices, aimlessness among our youth, anxiety among our elders and there is a virtual despair among the many who look beyond material success for the inner meaning of their lives. Where examples of morality should be set, the opposite is seen. Small men, seeking great wealth or power, have too often and too long turned even the highest levels of public service into mere personal opportunity.

Now, certainly, simple honesty is not too much to demand of men in government. We find it in most. Republicans demand it from everyone. They demand it from everyone no matter how exalted or protected his position might be. The growing menace in our country tonight, to personal safety, to life, to limb and property, in homes, in churches, on the playgrounds, and places of business, particularly in our great cities, is the mounting concern, or should be, of every thoughtful citizen in the United States.

Security from domestic violence, no less than from foreign aggression, is the most elementary and fundamental purpose of any government, and a government that cannot fulfill that purpose is one that cannot long command the loyalty of its citizens. History shows us - demonstrates that nothing - nothing prepares the way for tyranny more than the failure of public officials to keep the streets from bullies and marauders.

Now, we Republicans see all this as more, much more, than the rest: of mere political differences or mere political mistakes. We see this as the result of a fundamentally and absolutely wrong view of man, his nature and his destiny. Those who seek to live your lives for you, to take your liberties in return for relieving you of yours, those who elevate the state and downgrade the citizen must see ultimately a world in which earthly power can be substituted for divine will, and this Nation was founded upon the rejection of that notion and upon the acceptance of God as the author of freedom.

Those who seek absolute power, even though they seek it to do what they regard as good, are simply demanding the right to enforce their own version of heaven on earth. And let me remind you, they are the very ones who always create the most hellish tyrannies. Absolute power does corrupt, and those who seek it must be suspect and must be opposed. Their mistaken course stems from false notions of equality, ladies and gentlemen. Equality, rightly understood, as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences. Wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism.

Fellow Republicans, it is the cause of Republicanism to resist concentrations of power, private or public, which enforce such conformity and inflict such despotism. It is the cause of Republicanism to ensure that power remains in the hands of the people. And, so help us God, that is exactly what a Republican president will do with the help of a Republican Congress.

It is further the cause of Republicanism to restore a clear understanding of the tyranny of man over man in the world at large. It is our cause to dispel the foggy thinking which avoids hard decisions in the illusion that a world of conflict will somehow mysteriously resolve itself into a world of harmony, if we just don't rock the boat or irritate the forces of aggression - and this is hogwash.

It is further the cause of Republicanism to remind ourselves, and the world, that only the strong can remain free, that only the strong can keep the peace.

Now, I needn't remind you, or my fellow Americans regardless of party, that Republicans have shouldered this hard responsibility and marched in this cause before. It was Republican leadership under Dwight Eisenhower that kept the peace, and passed along to this administration the mightiest arsenal for defense the world has ever known. And I needn't remind you that it was the strength and the unbelievable will of the Eisenhower years that kept the peace by using our strength, by using it in the Formosa Straits and in Lebanon and by showing it courageously at all times.

It was during those Republican years that the thrust of Communist imperialism was blunted. It was during those years of Republican leadership that this world moved closer, not to war, but closer to peace, than at any other time in the three decades just passed.

And I needn't remind you - but I will - that it's been during Democratic years that our strength to deter war has stood still, and even gone into a planned decline. It has been during Democratic years that we have weakly stumbled into conflict, timidly refusing to draw our own lines against aggression, deceitfully refusing to tell even our people of our full participation, and tragically, letting our finest men die on battlefields (unmarked by purpose, unmarked by pride or the prospect of victory).

Yesterday it was Korea. Tonight it is Vietnam. Make no bones of this. Don't try to sweep this under the rug. We are at war in Vietnam. And yet the President, who is Commander-in-Chief of our forces, refuses to say - refuses to say, mind you, whether or not the objective over there is victory. And his Secretary of Defense continues to mislead and misinform the American people, and enough of it has gone by.

And I needn't remind you, but I will; it has been during Democratic years that a billion persons were cast into Communist captivity and their fate cynically sealed.

Today in our beloved country we have an administration which seems eager to deal with communism in every coin known - from gold to wheat, from consulates to confidence, and even human freedom itself.

The Republican cause demands that we brand communism as a principal disturber of peace in the world today. Indeed, we should brand it as the only significant disturber of the peace, and we must make clear that until its goals of conquest are absolutely renounced and its rejections with all nations tempered, communism and the governments it now controls are enemies of every man on earth who is or wants to be free.

We here in America can keep the peace only if we remain vigilant and only if we remain strong. Only if we keep our eyes open and keep our guard up can we prevent war. And I want to make this abundantly clear - I don't intend to let peace or freedom be torn from our grasp because of lack of strength or lack of will - and that I promise you Americans.

I believe that we must look beyond the defense of freedom today to its extension tomorrow. I believe that the communism which boasts it will bury us will, instead, give way to the forces of freedom. And I can see in the distant and yet recognizable future the outlines of a world worthy our dedication, our every risk, our every effort, our every sacrifice along the way. Yes, a world that will redeem the suffering of those who will be liberated from tyranny. I can see and I suggest that all thoughtful men must contemplate the flowering of an Atlantic civilization, the whole world of Europe unified and free, trading openly across its borders, communicating openly across the world. This is a goal far, far more meaningful than a moon shot.

It's a truly inspiring goal for all free men to set for themselves during the latter half of the twentieth century. I can also see - and all free men must thrill to - the events of this Atlantic civilization joined by its great ocean highway to the United States. What a destiny, what a destiny can be ours to stand as a great central pillar linking Europe, the Americans and the venerable and vital peoples and cultures of the Pacific. I can see a day when all the Americas, North and South, will be linked in a mighty system, a system in which the errors and misunderstandings of the past will be submerged one by one in a rising tide of prosperity and interdependence. We know that the misunderstandings of centuries are not to be wiped away in a day or wiped away in an hour. But we pledge - we pledge that human sympathy - what our neighbors to the South call that attitude of "simpatico" - no less than enlightened self'-interest will be our guide.

I can see this Atlantic civilization galvanizing and guiding emergent nations everywhere.

I know this freedom is not the fruit of every soil. I know that our own freedom was achieved through centuries, by unremitting efforts by brave and wise men. I know that the road to freedom is a long and a challenging road. I know also that some men may walk away from it, that some men resist challenge, accepting the false security of governmental paternalism.

And I pledge that the America I envision in the years ahead will extend its hand in health, in teaching and in cultivation, so that all new nations will be at least encouraged to go our way, so that they will not wander down the dark alleys of tyranny or to the dead-end streets of collectivism. My fellow Republicans, we do no man a service by hiding freedom's light under a bushel of mistaken humility.

I seek an American proud of its past, proud of its ways, proud of its dreams, and determined actively to proclaim them. But our example to the world must, like charity, begin at home.

In our vision of a good and decent future, free and peaceful, there must be room for deliberation of the energy and talent of the individual - otherwise our vision is blind at the outset.

We must assure a society here which, while never abandoning the needy or forsaking the helpless, nurtures incentives and opportunity for the creative and the productive. We must know the whole good is the product of many single contributions.

I cherish a day when our children once again will restore as heroes the sort of men and women who - unafraid and undaunted - pursue the truth, strive to cure disease, subdue and make fruitful our natural environment and produce the inventive engines of production, science, and technology.

This Nation, whose creative people have enhanced this entire span of history, should again thrive upon the greatness of all those things which we, as individual citizens, can and should do. During Republican years, this again will be a nation of men and women, of families proud of their role, jealous of their responsibilities, unlimited in their aspirations - a Nation where all who can will be self-reliant.

We Republicans see in our constitutional form of government the great framework which assures the orderly but dynamic fulfillment of the whole man, and we see the whole man as the great reason for instituting orderly government in the first place.

We see, in private property and in economy based upon and fostering private property, the one way to make government a durable ally of the whole man, rather than his determined enemy. We see in the sanctity of private property the only durable foundation for constitutional government in a free society. And beyond that, we see, in cherished diversity of ways, diversity of thoughts, of motives and accomplishments. We do not seek to lead anyone's life for him - we seek only to secure his rights and to guarantee him opportunity to strive, with government performing only those needed and constitutionally sanctioned tasks which cannot otherwise be performed.

We Republicans seek a government that attends to its inherent responsibilities of maintaining a stable monetary and fiscal climate, encouraging a free and a competitive economy and enforcing law and order. Thus do we seek inventiveness, diversity, and creativity within a stable order, for we Republicans define government's role where needed at many, many levels, preferably through the one closest to the people involved.

Our towns and our cities, then our counties, then our states, then our regional contacts - and only then, the national government. That, let me remind you, is the ladder of liberty, built by decentralized power. On it also we must have balance between the branches of government at every level.

Balance, diversity, creativity - these are the elements of Republican equation. Republicans agree, Republicans agree heartily to disagree on many, many of their applications, but we have never disagreed on the basic fundamental issues of why you and I are Republicans.

This is a party, this Republican Party, a Party for free men, not for blind followers, and not for conformists.

Back in 1858 Abraham Lincoln said this of the Republican party - and I quote him, because he probably could have said it during the last week or so: "It was composed of strained, discordant, and even hostile elements" in 1858. Yet all of these elements agreed on one paramount objective: To arrest the progress of slavery, and place it in the course of ultimate extinction.

Today, as then, but more urgently and more broadly than then, the task of preserving and enlarging freedom at home and safeguarding it from the forces of tyranny abroad is great enough to challenge all our resources and to require all our strength. Anyone who joins us in all sincerity, we welcome. Those who do not care for our cause, we don't expect to enter our ranks in any case. And let our Republicanism, so focused and so dedicated, not be made fuzzy and futile by unthinking and stupid labels.

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

The beauty of the very system we Republicans are pledged to restore and revitalize, the beauty of this Federal system of ours is in its reconciliation of diversity with unity. We must not see malice in honest differences of opinion, and no matter how great, so long as they are not inconsistent with the pledges we have given to each other in and through our Constitution. Our Republican cause is not to level out the world or make its people conform in computer regimented sameness. Our Republican cause is to free our people and light the way for liberty throughout the world.

Ours is a very human cause for very humane goals.

This Party, its good people, and its unquestionable devotion to freedom, will not fulfill the purposes of this campaign which we launch here now until our cause has won the day, inspired the world, and shown the way to a tomorrow worthy of all our yesteryears.

I repeat, I accept your nomination with humbleness, with pride, and you and I are going to fight for the goodness of our land. Thank you.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1964; goldwater; rnc; speech; transcript
Go, Goldwater, lets go, Goldwater,
Let's go for honest leadership!
Go, Goldwater, let's go, Goldwater!
Let's end that wheelerdealership!
He will keep our nation strong and out of war.
He will cut the waiste and graft, and then what's more,
He will throw the rascals out and slam the door!
In your heart, you know he's right,
So go, Goldwater, let's go, Goldwater, let's go, Goldwater, all the way!
Just make a note to cast your vote for Mr. USA!
1 posted on 07/16/2005 9:38:01 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

I remember it. I was 19 years old and not old enough to vote yet. He would have had my vote otherwise.

I remember standing in formation while old sarge handed out absentee ballot requests and being peeved because I wasn't old enough to get one. (Not many of us were)


2 posted on 07/16/2005 9:52:33 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

Wasn't he a big reason why the South went republican and stayed that way?


3 posted on 07/16/2005 9:55:03 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

Is there audio for this?


4 posted on 07/16/2005 10:00:24 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52
I was there, in the Cow Palace in San Francisco, to see this speech, fresh out of college, with my first wife. Sadly, the only thing that turned out well was my college degree, and it had its defects.

I wrote the experience up in a column entitled, "Twenty Years of Chinese Mustard." Alas, that's too old for the Internet to have heard of it. LOL.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The Fry Cook Rule for the Supreme Court"

5 posted on 07/16/2005 10:03:29 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 85-15 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52
The election in which America began to slip away ....
6 posted on 07/16/2005 10:04:37 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I was 16 and watched on TV. I was in awe of Goldwater. WHY NOT VICTORY, THE CONSCIENCE OF A CONSERVATIVE, McCARTHY AND HIS ENEMIES, MASTERS OF DECEIT, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON, and GOD AND MAN AT YALE contained some of my early lessons.


7 posted on 07/16/2005 10:17:07 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I didn't care for him then and I still think he was all talk. Here are some more of his wonderful quotes.

"I don't have any respect for the Religious Right. There is no place in this country for practicing religion in politics. That goes for Falwell, Robertson and all the rest of these political preachers. They are a detriment to the country."

"A lot of so-called conservatives don't know what the word means. They think I've turned liberal because I believe a woman has a right to an abortion. That's a decision that's up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the Religious Right."

He was wrong about the following:
"If they succeed in establishing religion as a basic Republican Party tenet," he told U.S. News & World Report in 1994, "they could do us in." "When you say 'radical right' today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye."

Without the evangelicals, the Pubbies have no majority so why spit on them?

8 posted on 07/16/2005 10:49:32 PM PDT by bluecollarman (Four More Years....Bush 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dodger

The election that gave us Reagan. Goldwater was jealous of Reagan, who was NOT all talk, as AuH20 was.


9 posted on 07/16/2005 11:11:58 PM PDT by sine_nomine (Protect the weakest of the weak - the unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

I was only 8 in '64, but anyway, I like the above paragraph from his speech. Moderation, i.e., like Kerry wanting to treat terrorism as a nuisance. (Unless I misunderstand the paragraph??)


10 posted on 07/16/2005 11:17:17 PM PDT by tina07 (Bush/Cheney'04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

From http://www.facesofalzheimers.org/BGoldwater.html find a link to http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barrygoldwater1964rnc.htm which has an MP3 link under it.


11 posted on 07/16/2005 11:19:36 PM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

He sounds anti Christian in those quotes.


12 posted on 07/16/2005 11:21:21 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Filson
Is there audio for this?

I believe an audio version of Goldwater's speech can be found somewhere in the Internet. I have a recording of it on a 331/3 rpm audiodisc, as well as a 45 rpm recording of "Go, Goldwater," his official ampaign song, whose lyrics I posted in my commentary.

13 posted on 07/16/2005 11:23:04 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

Because he's more liberterian than most of the Republican party as we know it today. He eschewed the religious right--he was far more secular in his conservatism. He believed in getting the government out of the bedroom, and out of our individual lives, and fighting communism. It wasn't a metamorphosis to liberalism with age. His positions were forever consistent. When he ran in 64, abortion was not a major political issue as it was just even ten years later. He believed it was up to the pregnant woman as an individual, and at most the purview of the states to act on to restrict or permit.

Though individuals in the party who are evangelicals are indispensable to the conservative movement, I too think it was a big mistake for us to be completely captive to the Christian Coalition and the Moral Majority. In a way it is not much different than the Democratic party being captive to Americans for Democratic Action and MoveOn.org.

There was action behind Goldwater's talk, In international affairs and on the homefront.


14 posted on 07/16/2005 11:29:52 PM PDT by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote" Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

These quotes are from the jaded Goldwater of the 1990's, who was no longer the courageous activist of the 1950's and 1960's.


15 posted on 07/16/2005 11:32:06 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
To the tune of the hymn "Rock of Ages":

Rockefeller's not for me. He is not for GOP
He is for the welfare state; he has had more than one mate.
Rockefeller's not for me. He is not for GOP.
R-O-C-K-E-Y--Oh, you SOB!

16 posted on 07/16/2005 11:38:12 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
WHY NOT VICTORY, THE CONSCIENCE OF A CONSERVATIVE, McCARTHY AND HIS ENEMIES, MASTERS OF DECEIT, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON, and GOD AND MAN AT YALE contained some of my early lessons.

These same books acquainted me with conservatism.

17 posted on 07/16/2005 11:42:28 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Schwaeky
I have to agree. The Christian Conservatives want, in fact demand that certain issues need to have the government in our lives, yet decry it when it enters the arena that liberals belive it should be involved in.

Christian Conservatives have in reality given up on the belief that they and their institutions such as the church can influence society. They have basically ceded the notion that deep faith can bring deep change. They want it in their time rather than the Lord's time. In fact, many churches have lost their own moral clarity, so they believe we must have law legislated or bibical law enfoced by our own courts.

Certainly abortion is wrong from a Christian perspective. Yet Christian leaders and their churches have lost the ability to influence the lives of their followers and those outside the church but yet would feel compelled to follow a good example. There will always be fallen individuals and individuals who will commit crimes or sin. But the average person who will follow a good example cannot find one in todays Christians or their churches.

18 posted on 07/17/2005 12:10:51 AM PDT by now you people out there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: now you people out there

Fantastic post. They can't influence even their followers, so want to legislate it. Which to me is a deal with the devil.


19 posted on 07/17/2005 12:40:21 AM PDT by ran15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: now you people out there; ran15
so they believe we must have law legislated or bibical law enfoced by our own courts.


absurd ...
should we get rid of laws against theft?
laws against assault?
laws against murder?
after all there is "Biblical" reference there.

abortion is a medical/theological debate.
When does life begin?
When is murder .. murder. The law against murder is already on the books.
20 posted on 07/17/2005 6:31:09 AM PDT by THEUPMAN (#### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ran15
Actually it's sad. They've lost their way both spritually, faithfully and in scripture.

I side with their need for morality. I cringe at the rests under the own steeples.

21 posted on 07/17/2005 6:59:53 AM PDT by now you people out there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52
These quotes are from the jaded Goldwater of the 1990's

With all due respect, he was not just jaded by then, he was a full blown RINO.

22 posted on 07/17/2005 7:42:45 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

Goldwater certainly wasn't always right. My primary support of him was for his vision of foreign policy and defeat of the Soviets.


23 posted on 07/17/2005 8:39:49 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52

And now, my bookshelf has about 40 anti-Clinton and anti-lib books. The list is too long.


24 posted on 07/17/2005 8:41:35 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He certainly beat the alternative. LBJ almost single-handedly ruined this country. His disastrous "Great Society" may kill this country yet.


25 posted on 07/17/2005 8:50:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: THEUPMAN

Let's then prosecute both the doctor and the woman involved in an abortion when Roe is overturned. First degreee. Premediated.


26 posted on 07/17/2005 6:34:33 PM PDT by now you people out there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Schwaeky
You miss my point. It is stupid politics to assault evangelicals. He did not display good judgment better to say nothing than divide your base.

"In a way it is not much different than the Democratic party being captive to Americans for Democratic Action and MoveOn.org."

I'd gladly trade in all of the Mikey Moores for Pat Robertsons. It is a lot different.

To the folks that cry about the church not satisfying the flock. Stop making laws and a culture that continues assaulting Judeo-Christian values. You are not helping. The liberals, schools, entertainment industry and ACLU are working overtime to tear down those religious institutions in which you readily assail. They do not need any help from conservatives.

27 posted on 07/17/2005 8:57:38 PM PDT by bluecollarman (Four More Years....Bush 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson