Skip to comments.Conn. Gun Club Can be Sued for Lead Pollution
Posted on 07/20/2005 10:28:54 AM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
A group of homeowners who live near a gun club have standing to sue the club for dumping lead and other ammunition-related pollutants into the surrounding area, a Connecticut federal court has ruled .
The court dismissed one of the homeowners' claims under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, concluding that lead shot is not "hazardous waste" at the time it is discharged from a firearm because it is being used for its intended purpose.
The court's ruling permits the homeowners to press their remaining claims under the RCRA and the Clean Water Act.
The Metacon Gun Club Inc. has operated a shooting range in Simsbury, Conn., for 15 years, court filings say. Members and guests are permitted to use large and small firearms, including shotguns, assault rifles and anti-tank guns at the site. The club borders the Farmington River, as well as a golf course, riding stable and Talcott Mountain State Park.
The Simsbury-Avon Preservation Society LLC, composed of six homeowners who live near the site, claims the gun club causes water and soil contamination from chromium, lead, ammunition fragments and other pollutants. It alleges that "thousands of pounds of lead" were deposited into the environment since 1980 and the area shows a lead presence well above that allowed by state environmental laws.
Simsbury-Avon and its individual members sued Metacon for violations of the RCRA and the CWA. Specifically, it maintains that Metacon violated the RCRA by open dumping lead and lead debris. It further alleges that Metacon, an owner and operator of a waste facility, has engaged in hazardous waste disposal without obtaining a permit from the Environmental Protection Agency or the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
In addition, Simsbury-Avon claims that Metacon violated the CWA by discharging lead bullets and debris into the Farmington River and its wetlands without an EPA or DEP permit. The homeowners' group has requested declarative and injunctive relief as well as civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each RCRA and CWA violation.
Metacon moved to dismiss the claims, arguing that the group lacks standing to sue. Metacon contends that when the suit was filed May 13, 2004, the Simsbury-Avon Preservation Society did not legally exist. Further, the defendant maintains that adding individual plaintiffs does not cure the original defect.
Judge Janet B. Arterton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut disagreed. Although the group was officially incorporated five days after the complaint was filed, Simsbury-Avon and its individual members have standing to sue, she found. The judge noted that the group was a de facto corporation May 11, 2004, when its articles of incorporation were first submitted.
The judge dismissed one of the group's RCRA claims, which asserted that Metacon disposed of hazardous waste without a permit. In so ruling, Judge Arterton relied on a January 2001 EPA publication in which the agency concluded that lead shot is not hazardous waste subject to the RCRA at the time it is discharged from a firearm because it is being used for its intended purpose.
Judge Arterton found the EPA's exclusion of lead shot and bullets from the definition of "solid waste" in the RCRA reasonable.
"At the time a target shooter fires a bullet, the shooter is not intending to 'abandon' the bullet but rather to use it to hit a target. He or she is putting the lead bullet to its intended use," she said.
It is like the people who buy houses next to a farm and then complain about the smell of manure...
How can Lead be a pollutant? It's an element.
When the gun club reclaims the lead their is no problem and this type of lead does not leach out very easily.
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. If there's enough to lead there to be considered pollution, there's enough lead there that a person could make money mining it. Oh well, there's no room for common sense when it comes to environmentalism. What's sad is that the EPA will back the plaintiffs all the way.
Same way some humans are a pollutant, the place and time make them a pollutant.
What was there first, the gun club or the homes? I smell a back-door attack, probably instigated by Sarah Brady's bunch of gun-grabbers.
I want to see a demo of that!
Wow! That's one hell of a gun club!
BWA HAHAHA... I love how the media sensationalizes firearms. Instead of leaving it at "large and small firearms" they take it that extra step to make sure it's known that these people are apparently "EVIL" cuz they use their assault rifles and anti-tank guns.
Exactly...when I lived in the country in CT I had people complain about that very issue. Stupidity is rampant in CT and among liberals. Thank God I'm in a red state now...LOL
And the solubility of lead into water is? ...... Hmmmmm....
Not only this, but the whole "lead free" movement seems to be Chicken Little writ large! Why not ban copper?
So is arsenic.
The CT state police range is just down the street from Metacon.
I wonder if it'll be sued too?
These losers are suing the possibility of pollution, trying to place an unbearable burden on the defendant to prove himself innocent.
Not exactly the way the system is supposed to work.
Plus, have you ever tried to dissolve lead in water? Try it sometime. ;)
"Simsbury-Avon Preservation Society"
What a bunch of saps...
This could, if done skillfully, be manipulated into an amicus scenario, whereby the entire "lead free" movement might be discredited and made legally indefensible. T'would be nice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.