Let's try this again: There is no "one" interpretation of Islam any more than there is one interpretation of Christianity (see: denominations). And it's just moronic to think that all those Iraqis and Afghans fighting with us are Quakers or Mennonites. They're MUSLIMS, for cryin' out loud. And they are CLEARLY rejecting jihad and fighting with us.
"They're MUSLIMS, for cryin' out loud. And they are CLEARLY rejecting jihad and fighting with us."
Excuse me. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Have you read the Koran? Have you read the Hadith? I have spent the last three years and over a thousand hours studying Islam. What authority or credentials do you have to lecture me?
If you had bothered to do a little homework instead of jabbering from your feelings (like most libs do by the way) then you would know that it makes no difference who interprets what as what in the Koran. It would also be clear where the terrorist get their inspiration from. It would be clear as well that Mo Ham Head himself ordained Jihad as MANDATORY if you are to be a "good" Muslim.
I've already noted that the peaceful Muslims are the ones that don't know there own religion and don't practice it. This is a fact. I've also already made it clear that while it is certain that all Muslims are not terrorist, it IS certain that nearly all terrorist are muslim and that there is a very good reason for that.
I suggest that you learn about Islam first before defending it. Why don't you visit this site, www.faithfreedom.org and read the information, join the blog and talk to ex-Muslims from places like Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, etc. I also suggest reading the Koran and some of the more reputable Hadith and learn about Mohammed. Then come back to me and explain to me who is stupid.