Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

national review online ^ | 7-2005 | Byron York

Posted on 07/21/2005 2:56:40 PM PDT by doug from upland


Look for Republicans to point to the confirmations of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer as models of the process that should be employed in the effort to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. Both Ginsburg and Breyer were nominated and confirmed at a time (1993-1994) in which the president's party -- Democrats -- also controlled the Senate. And both were given relatively easy passage through the Senate because the minority party -- Republicans -- cooperated with Democrats to ensure a quick confirmation. Ginsburg was nominated on June 14, 1993 and confirmed by the Senate on August 3, 1993. Breyer was nominated on May 13, 1994 and confirmed on July 29, 1994.

They moved with such speed because Republicans, in particular Sen. Orrin Hatch, the ranking GOP member on the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time, declined to challenge their records. Ginsburg, in particular, received something of a bye from Republicans despite her former position as general counsel of the American Civil Liberties Union; had they chosen to, Republicans could have hung every extreme ACLU position around Ginsburg's neck. Instead, "Sen. Hatch put an orderly and fair process above scoring political points," says one high-ranking staffer involved at the time. "It ensured that the Senate's conduct of the hearings was constructive rather than divisive."

Republicans also chose not to oppose Ginsburg even though she refused to answer dozens of questions during her confirmation hearings. Among others, she declined to give her views on Roe v. Wade, on the Second Amendment, on the death penalty, on the Voting Rights Act, on race-based congressional redistricting, and on adoption rights for gay couples, among many other issues. At one point in her hearings, Republican Sen. Strom Thurmond told her, "In preparing these questions or any others I may propound during the hearings, if you feel they are inappropriate to answer, will you speak out and say so." On another occasion, Thurmond said, "I will not press you to answer any that you feel are inappropriate."

Not surprisingly, Democrats wholeheartedly agreed. Then-chairman Sen. Joseph Biden told Ginsburg, "You not only have a right to choose what you will answer and not answer, but in my view you should not answer a question of what your view will be on an issue that clearly is going to come before the court in 50 forms probably, over your tenure on the court."

Of course, Republicans today realize that Democrats, now the minority party, will never extend to a Bush nominee the sort of treatment the GOP gave Ginsburg in 1993. Nevertheless, they will tell the story over and over, in hopes that someone will listen.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: byronyork; confirmation; ginsburg; johnroberts; roberts; robertshearings; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: F16Fighter

"They should have just flushed Satan-Ginsburg's nomination down the toilet."

I agree the Pubs would have never filibustered, but just how could 43 of them stopped Ginsburg?

41 posted on 07/21/2005 4:48:29 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sinbad17
I was thinking the same thing. The far left wing creeps[shumer Kennedy] will vote against him no matter what he says , so I would tell them to kiss off! But I was wondering if the attacks and badgering really get vicious and out of control does Spector or whoever have the right to object or shut the hearings down or will the abuse just be'' tolerated?'' I want whoever is in charge or conducting these hearing to have some guts and put these Senators in their place. But I don't really know the official rules on the hearings. I was not into politics at the time of the Thomas hearings but I do remember having to turn the set off cause it was pretty awful what the DemocRATS were doing to him.
42 posted on 07/21/2005 4:51:27 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

They wouldn't have had to nuke the pubs. Chafee, Sp[ectre, and Snow gladly would've voted to end a filibuster.

43 posted on 07/21/2005 4:55:03 PM PDT by canadiancapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"The disgraced impeached scumbag president had the right to get his leftist judge. Our president has the right to get his conservative judge. The lesson is that we had better keep winning elections until we can get a 9-0 court."

With one caveat:


44 posted on 07/21/2005 4:56:40 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
"I agree the Pubs would have never filibustered, but just how could 43 of them stopped Ginsburg?"

The same way the Dems have been filibustering, making a mockery of the approval process, and scaring the crap out of the Pubbies.

45 posted on 07/21/2005 4:59:29 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: canadiancapitalist

I didn't consider that.

Let's see: 57 + 3 = 60.

Yep, you're right, it adds up. Closure. No nuke needed.

46 posted on 07/21/2005 5:34:51 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
According to Sandy Berger (Robert's former law partner), Roberts is the smartest person in every room.

Considering the source, he probably meant Roberts was the smartest dresser in every room.

47 posted on 07/22/2005 10:05:51 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Dean won't call Osama guilty without a trial, but DeLay and Rove should be in jail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson