Skip to comments.Is Internment on the Table?
Posted on 07/21/2005 4:58:24 PM PDT by faithincowboys
How do prevent the stop-n-go jihad that is currently going on in London from happening here? Should we have an El Al if-you're-a-Muslim-you-don't-ride standard for our planes and trains?
At the very least will those traveling on subways in this country have to carry their things in mesh, see-through carry bags like they do in many public high schools-- in reaction to Columbine-- in this Country?
Clearly, their are many terror cells, native and foreign born , in this country. Monitoring mosques, forbidding muslims entry into certain engineering programs at our universities, massive deportations of problem muslims and ,gasp, a plan for internment should be prepared by a guy like John Pointdexter for implementaion if necessary.
Internment is an option and the POTUS should seal the borders stat.
Loyalty oaths first...then internment. Lets give em a fair shake.
I am more severe
This is worse than WWII in that regard
The seeds are planted in young insane cultists
There is only one option
So since a stop-n-go jihad is so livable, mosey on down to London and ride the tube 24/7.
What we need is a Woodrow Wilson to do two things ~ (1) Make a deal with the appropriate "ethnicities" for all their young men (and women) to be inserted into our military structure for the purpose of killing their cousins abroad, and (2) Rounding up some of the big-mouths and imprisoning them for the duration.
Besides internment, what in my post do you find offensive?
And who ot what would prevent the perp from carrying a cardboard box (with gift wrapping and ribbons, if it catches their fancy) in a mesh bag? One could even set up the bomb detonation by jerking the gift ribbon knot untied, like a grenade pin. One would need to demand see-through property on everything the potential perp carries or is wearing. Otherwise it makes sense.
I'm kinda leaning toward interment, myself.
During World War I, we were never in the national peril that we are in now. That was an on-the-other-guy's-turf war
and the immigrants who shared the aims of our foes were in no position to inflict mass murder like they are now. It's wholly different.
Or we could wait for the Islamo-fascists to do it for us, while we clap on the sidelines declaring what a "religion of peace" it is...
If all options aren't on the table to achieve Victory, then Victory shouldn't be on the table either.
I don't think we'll see internment camps. We will see attacks that enrage the public and muslims will be driven out or dragged into the modern world.
In North Korea, anyway.
Generally it would be forbidden. Sorry, if you want to play Sanata Claus, take a taxi.
Are you saying it would never be an option? We already had an internment in this country and we weren't North Korea when FDR did it.
I'd rather take victory off the table than the Constitution. Seriously.
America isn't an end in itself; it's a means to an end. The end is freedom.
I think we all must. We don't do so joyously, but we, like the Greatest Generation, might have to do it.
Do you, for one minute, think that we can put every Muslim, in American, in a "camp" ? How are you going to find them all? You can't do that by what they look like, you know. Or do you only want to put Egyptian and Saudi and Yemeni and Pakistani immigrants and those who have been citizens of America for generations, into these camps? What about the blacks who belong to the NOI or for REAL Islam ? How about white converts?
We already interned people and America , the spirit and the nation, endured.