Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nebraska charges man for having sex with 14-year-old wife
Associated Press ^ | Tuesday July 26, 2005 | KEVIN O'HANLON

Posted on 07/26/2005 2:08:42 PM PDT by BenLurkin

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) A 22-year-old man faces criminal charges in Nebraska for having sex with an underage 13-year-old girl, although he legally married her in Kansas after she became pregnant.

The man's lawyer said the couple, with their families' support, ``made a responsible decision to try to cope with the problem.''

Matthew Koso, 22, was charged Monday with first-degree sexual assault, punishable by up to 50 years in prison. He was released on $7,500 bail pending an Aug. 17 preliminary hearing.

After the girl became pregnant, her mother gave permission in May for Koso to take the young woman to Kansas, which allows minors to get married with parental consent. The girl is now 14 and seven months pregnant.

``The idea ... is repugnant to me,'' said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning. ``These people made the decision to send their ... 14-year-old daughter to Kansas to marry a pedophile.''

He said the marriage is valid, thanks to the ``ridiculous'' Kansas law, ``but it doesn't matter. I'm not going to stand by while a grown man ... has a relationship with a 13-year-old now 14-year-old girl.''

Bruning, who has said he will seek a second term in 2006, has aggressively prosecuted sex crimes against children since he was elected in 2002

The couple were married in May by a judge in Hiawatha, Kan., just across the state line from Falls City.

Nebraska allows people as young as 17 to marry if they have parental consent.

Kansas law, however, sets no minimum marriage age, although case law sets the minimum age at 14 for boys and 12 for girls. The marriage must be approved by both parents or guardian, or by a district court judge, said Whitney Watson, spokesman for Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline. A judge also must approve if only one parent approves.

Koso's lawyer, Willis Yoesel, said the girl's mother and Koso's parents approved of the marriage. He said the girl's father has not lived with the family for some time.

``It seems to me like they, as much as they could, made a responsible decision to try to cope with the problem,'' Yoesel said.

``The families are all united in this effort,'' Yoesel said. ``I don't know who is complaining. ... What benefit is there to anybody in the prosecution of this young man?''

There was no comment from Koso, who does not have a listed telephone number.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Kansas; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: cary; mohammed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2005 2:08:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"...What benefit is there to anybody in the prosecution of this young man?"

Um, keeping a child molestor off the streets?

2 posted on 07/26/2005 2:10:56 PM PDT by thoughtomator (How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning. ``These people made the decision to send their ... 14-year-old daughter to Kansas to marry a pedophile.'' He said the marriage is valid, thanks to the ``ridiculous'' Kansas law....

No jury in the history of the world is going to find the young man guilty.

3 posted on 07/26/2005 2:11:54 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Prophet Mohammed (may the peace and blessings of Allaah the beneficient and merciful be upon him) married a 5 yr old, so why is this bad?

/s


4 posted on 07/26/2005 2:13:18 PM PDT by Dolphan (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
He said the marriage is valid, thanks to the ``ridiculous'' Kansas law, ``but it doesn't matter. I'm not going to stand by while a grown man ... has a relationship with a 13-year-old now 14-year-old girl.''

I REALLY hope this guy doesn't go for any higher office. He COMPLETELY contradicted himself in one sentence right there. THEN AGAIN, he could have a great future as a Democrat....
5 posted on 07/26/2005 2:13:19 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Oddly in such cases, the male is always the age he is today. While the female is the age she was back when a crime is alledged.


6 posted on 07/26/2005 2:13:33 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is bigger than a lot of people might think. If the marriage is upheld in Federal courts under full faith and credit, then gay marriages will have to be recognized over state lines. If not, then the poisonous gay marriage decisions will be held within the borders. This is worth watching.


7 posted on 07/26/2005 2:13:33 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the Amishdude fan club: "LOL, you have a great sense of humor." -- msmagoo54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

No I could see a guilty verdict in Nebraska.

The jurors will be instructed on Nebraska law which evidently holds no exception for married couples.

I guess in Kansas it would be perfectly legal.


8 posted on 07/26/2005 2:14:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I guess he's being tried for the premarital sex, not postmarital.

I still doubt he'll be convicted, though.


9 posted on 07/26/2005 2:14:10 PM PDT by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

To be blunt, I've seen some 13-year-old girls I *really* thought were a lot older. Early bloomers, a side effect of growth hormones, I dunno... just... damn. Good thing I'm chick repellant, or I'd'a been in trouble sometimes.


10 posted on 07/26/2005 2:14:43 PM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Put me on that jury and I bet I can convince them he is.


11 posted on 07/26/2005 2:14:54 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Hm. This is a tough one -- he shouldn't have been having sex with her in the first place, but now he's married her.... The age of consent laws are designed to prevent older men from taking advantage, but the marriage seems to nullify that.

Of course, if it'd been my daughter, I'd be up on murder charges.

12 posted on 07/26/2005 2:15:13 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
For crying out loud - the kid was stupid to get involved with a teenager but at least he did the right thing by marrying her.

How long ago was it that 14 yo girls were married off? Here in the States?

I suppose they could have killed the baby, would that have been better?

13 posted on 07/26/2005 2:15:39 PM PDT by corkoman (Overhyped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I'm not sure 13 and 21 makes it any better.


14 posted on 07/26/2005 2:16:04 PM PDT by sharktrager (My life is like a box of chocolates, but someone took all the good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

No jury in the history of the world is going to find the young man guilty.
___________________________________________________

One would think unless the DA can stack the jury with people like the poster above your post.


15 posted on 07/26/2005 2:16:40 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Bruning is making a complete ass of himself.
He will lose this case and the ridicule will probably cost him the election as well.

So9

16 posted on 07/26/2005 2:16:49 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"...What benefit is there to anybody in the prosecution of this young man?"

Um, keeping a child molestor off the streets?

I don't know what is in the mind of an adult who wants to have sex with a child, but the culture seems to find it "O.K." Mary Kay Leturneau (sp?) is apparently marrying the father of her two youngest children who was 12 when they first became involved, and it is all perfectly legal. Very strange...

17 posted on 07/26/2005 2:16:51 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The prosecutor can bluster all he wants, and we can debate the morality of it all we want. The truth is this: they are married, legally. Furthermore, it's generally unreasonable to think that a husband is not going to have sex with his wife for 4 years. What this guy did is not illegal, thus, he cannot and should not be prosecuted.

It might be a good idea for Kansans to write their congresscritters, however, and see about getting some laws changed.
18 posted on 07/26/2005 2:17:00 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
If I were on the jury, I'd like to know if this was a habit, or passion.

I'm familiar with a similar case, where a teenaged boy of legal age (just barely) served time for sexual assault, who then returned when both were of age and married the girl. They're just another couple now, and he's trying to get his name off the sexual offenders list. Should he get cut a break? The ages and age differences were similar to Romeo and Juliet.

We do have these early marriages in our frontier history. There should be some common sense applied here--

19 posted on 07/26/2005 2:17:25 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The sad thing is that if he'd have gotten her an abortion, there'd be no problem.


20 posted on 07/26/2005 2:18:02 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson