Posted on 07/27/2005 1:40:09 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
The U.S. Government is now openly supporting the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, an Iranian resistance movement designated as terrorist organization by the US State Department. On June 20th of this year, the Mujahideen-e-Khalq held a conference at the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad, which is where many foreign journalists stay and is under the full protection of the U.S. Army. I was in the area of the hotel that day, and saw at least 10 U.S. tanks heading in the direction of the hotel to provide additional security. I knew of the conference in advance, because of a report issued to all NGO's working in Iraq, which mentioned that the conference would take place. The report warned of an increased danger of attacks against the hotel, as anti- U.S. insurgents were likely to attempt to disrupt the conference [1].
The Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) is a Marxist oriented Iranian resistance organization founded in the 1960's to topple the pro- western regime of Reza Shah. Since that time, MEK has carried out scores of attacks and assassinated a number of Iranian government officials. MEK killed several American military and civilian personnel in Iran during the 1970's, and assisted in the occupation of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979 where American civilians were held hostage. Though MEK participated in the 1979 revolution, which toppled the Shah, once the Ayatollah Khomeini consolidated power in Iran, MEK moved their headquarters to Paris and continued resistance activities against the Islamic Republic. In 1981, MEK bombed the offices of the Islamic Republic Party, killing 70 high-ranking Iranian officials. MEK established its military headquarters in Iraq in 1986, where Saddam Hussein became their main source of funding and protection. In return, the MEK fought alongside Iraqi forces during the war against Iran in the 1980's, and assisted Saddam's security forces in putting down the Kurdish and Shiite revolts after the first Gulf War in 1991. The majority of Saddam's recently discovered mass graves are filled with the Shiite and Kurdish dead from this uprising. MEK military operations against Iranian targets continued through the 1990's. The U.S. Department of State added the MEK to its official list of terrorist organizations in 1997, and shut down the organization's Washington, DC office in 2003 [2].
During the U.S. invasion of Iraq, MEK forces in Iraq surrendered to U.S. forces and turned over their military hard wear, including several thousand tanks, armored personnel carriers, anti-aircraft guns, and other vehicles. Despite denying suspected terrorists from Afghanistan and elsewhere prisoner of war status under the Geneva conventions, the US granted this status to detained members of MEK in Iraq [3].
Support for the MEK reveals one of the advantages the U.S. has acquired by occupying Iraq. The country can now be used as a staging post for carrying out attacks against regimes hostile to U.S. interests in the region, whether through proxy organizations such as MEK, or by attacking such countries directly by dispatching U.S. forces based on Iraqi soil. U.S. planners are currently somewhat constrained from using the latter option due to the difficulty they face in pacifying Iraq, so the first option, namely supporting terrorist organizations that are trying to destabilize the Iranian regime, will likely be their preferred course of action until U.S. control of Iraq is fully consolidated.
So when Paul Wolfowitz promised Iraqis in 2003 that the US would hunt down the "monsters" that assisted Saddam in digging the mass graves in 1991 [4], the Bush administration was in fact just beginning its support for some of the direct perpetrators of these crimes. Also revealing is U.S. criticism of the new Iranian president elect, due to his alleged involvement in holding U.S. embassy personnel hostage in 1979. Though the U.S. admits the MEK was involved in the same incident, White House support for this terrorist organization continues. This kind of hypocrisy reveals much about what the global "war on terror" is really about. It's not a war against terror as such, but rather a war of terror to subdue resistance to the US designs in the region.
Sources:
[1] The organization which provides these security reports does not allow them to be cited publicly, and thus I cannot indicate the name of the source. The report for June 19th, 2005 stated the following: "A large conference involving the mujahadeen kalk and sponsored by the Iraqi Government is scheduled to take place in the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad 20th June, this may lead to insurgent attempts to disrupt the conference, HOM are advised to advise their staff to avoid this area."
[2] US State Department, Patterns of Global Terrorism 2002 (pdf). See specifically Appendix B: Background Information on designated foreign terrorist organizations, pg. 115 for information on the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq
See also this description of the group from Globalsecurity.org.
[3] Why the US granted 'protected' status to Iranian terrorists, The Christian Science Monitor, 07/29/2004.
[4] New York Times, July 20th, 2003.
You'd better switch to instruments then because your plain has not right wing.
I wouldn't doubt that he/she/it has some connection with the originating source. Their styles are about the same.
I am an independent person!
I might dislike idiot Leftists but I do not support cooperation of the US government with bunch of Marxist-Islamist terrorists whom were involved in killing of Americans!
That is it!
But you are trying to make an issue over an article by an anti-American group that pushes all sorts of lies?
No, I did not! It was you who care about the source but not the contents.
I did not even care about the source.
I did/do care about the content of the article which is an established fact!
And I believe we are losing our crediblity among Pro-American Iranians by supporting their enemy!
And we also give excuses to such leftist groups to bash Bush and his admin
Do you want that?
So, the question is, was there a conference, and did our troops provide support? And if so, why?
Just because a left-wing site raises an issue, doesn't mean it should be immediately ignored or dismissed by the Right. And if it turns out it's untrue, then it's more evidence and ammunition against the Left.
LOL! Of course it doesn't occur to you that the source effects the truth of the article? As I said, by your standards Michael Moore is legitimate.
Did I support Michael Moore or Did I ever talk about it?
A left wing, anti-American site that has a lot of lies posted on their site at this very moment!
Strange how you and the left winged wonder there are defending that site so diligently.
Yes, when you say that any anti-American activitist tells the truth...remember, you don't care about the source.
LoL
If you say so!
Pop on over to the source website and take a nice long look around. You might find the composite photo of the "Known American" soldier amusing. One of their talented artists took the time to morph the faces of all of our dead service people for their twisted agenda.
No, actually it was you who said: "I did not even care about the source."
Whatever!
It doesn't change the fact that MEK is now being used by Pentagon!
Can you deny that?
Okie dokie!
It doesn't change the fact that you are fanatically pushing a story by a site that provable prints lies and gross distortions and that you don't care about that for some strange reason. As I said, your plane is all left wing.
lol. I am not defending the site. I've never heard of them.
But I don't think it's right to immediately dismiss every detail, just because it's left wing.
And, there have been a number of other indications that some in our gov't, though thankfully not many, would like to take MEK off the terrorist list.
And MEK held a conference in the DAR Conference Center in Washington this past April (I believe).
So, there's some history behind this that makes it sound plausible.
LOL! All you're doing is defending the site and their "agenda".
-----------------------------------------------
No, f14 what you are is an iranian propagandist and your only concern about MEK is not their politics or their history but the fact that they are the only iranians actively fighting the mullahs and if they get in then the shahistas are sunk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.