Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Miami) Herald columnist Jim DeFede fired over taped phone call
Miami Herald ^ | Thu, Jul. 28, 2005 | JAY WEAVER

Posted on 07/28/2005 6:44:27 AM PDT by Happy Valley Dude

Metro columnist Jim DeFede said he taped a phone conversation with Art Teele hours before the politician shot himself. Executives said they fired DeFede because taping is illegal without consent.

The Herald fired columnist Jim DeFede Wednesday because he tape-recorded a phone conversation with Arthur E. Teele Jr. without his knowledge.

Teele had killed himself in The Herald's lobby earlier in the day without ever knowing that the columnist recorded their conversation.

Both Publisher Jesús Díaz Jr. and Executive Editor Tom Fiedler said they fired the popular Metro writer because it is illegal for anyone to tape a conversation with another person without that individual's consent in Florida.

DeFede told them that during his interview with Teele, he turned on a tape machine to record his conversation as the politician confided in him about his public corruption charges, financial problems and other sensitive issues, according to Díaz.

At one point, Teele told the columnist that he was not speaking on the record -- but DeFede continued to record him anyway without his knowledge, Díaz said.

Díaz said that The Herald had no choice but to dismiss DeFede because his conduct was potentially a felony crime and unethical.

''With all of our sources, we have to treat them with respect and dignity,'' Díaz said. ``I don't think we did that in this situation.''

''The public's trust is at stake as a result of Jim's actions,'' Díaz said. ``We have to make sure that the public understands that trust is the most important value that the community bestows upon us.''

Fiedler, who was in San Jose, Calif., at The Herald's parent company, Knight Ridder, said the decision to fire DeFede was difficult.

''Jim has been a strong and valued voice at The Miami Herald and his departure will leave a significant void,'' Fiedler said in a statement. ``I am personally heartsick about this. But we must hold ourselves to the highest standard of integrity if we are to maintain the trust of our readers and those with whom we deal.''

Herald editors decided not to publish DeFede's column based on his interview with Teele because it was obtained under possibly illegal circumstances.

DeFede, a Herald columnist since June 2002 who had previously worked at the Miami New Times, stunned colleagues with the news of his firing as editors were editing the final Teele stories for Thursday's paper.

''As Teele was becoming unglued [on the phone], I turned on a tape recorder because I could tell that he was distraught and bouncing off the walls,'' DeFede told more than a dozen staffers in the newsroom. ``I made an illegal tape and the company decided to fire me.''

DeFede, who did not want to comment further, issued a prepared statement:

''In a tense situation I made a mistake,'' he said. ``The Miami Herald executives only learned about it because I came to them and admitted it.

``I told them I was willing to accept a suspension and apologize both to the newsroom and our readers. Unfortunately, The Herald decided on the death penalty instead.''

DeFede had covered Teele for more than a decade. When Teele was arrested for allegedly threatening undercover police officers who were tailing him and his wife, DeFede wrote a column saying the charges should never have been filed.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: defede; jimdefede; knightridder; media; miami; miamiherald; teele
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
I am not sad to see one of the biggest (both figeratively and literally) liberals in South Florida journalism go.
1 posted on 07/28/2005 6:44:29 AM PDT by Happy Valley Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

It's not illegal in Oklahoma.


2 posted on 07/28/2005 6:46:30 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Newbie!


3 posted on 07/28/2005 6:47:08 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Is it also illegal to tape obsecene phone calls or threats to ones life?


4 posted on 07/28/2005 6:48:38 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Welcome to Free Republic and thanks for the article ...interesting...


5 posted on 07/28/2005 6:49:54 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude
''Jim has been a strong and valued voice at The Miami Herald and his departure will leave a significant void,'' Fiedler said in a statement. ``I am personally heartsick about this. But we must hold ourselves to the highest standard of integrity if we are to maintain the trust of our readers and those with whom we deal.''

Excuse me for a few hours while I regain my composure here - I'm laughing so hard it just can't be healthy.

6 posted on 07/28/2005 6:50:19 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat

It's a federal violation - so it's illegal in OK. also.


7 posted on 07/28/2005 6:51:27 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

The Miami Herald is a great paper...
...to wrap fish with.


8 posted on 07/28/2005 6:53:57 AM PDT by Riptides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Their nuts if they think I'll trust them.


9 posted on 07/28/2005 6:55:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude
Er ah, the public has NO trust in the media.

We expect the worst from them and they usually manage to fulfill that expectation.

10 posted on 07/28/2005 6:56:06 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
It's a federal violation - so it's illegal in OK. also.

Incorrect. It's perfectly legal in single party consent states. Federal law doesn't come into consideration until the call crosses state lines. If both states are single party consent there's no violation.

http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html

11 posted on 07/28/2005 6:59:01 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
It's a federal violation - so it's illegal in OK. also.

The laws on taping phone cnversations vary on a state by state basis. It's not a federal issue.

12 posted on 07/28/2005 6:59:41 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
Newbie?

Happy Valley Dude
Since Aug 30, 2000

13 posted on 07/28/2005 7:03:14 AM PDT by b4its2late (Suicidal Blond Twin Kills Sister By Mistake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
It's a federal violation -

Don't think so. Here it's perfectly legal as long a one of the parties is aware of the recording.

14 posted on 07/28/2005 7:03:15 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude
DeFede, a Herald columnist since June 2002 who had previously worked at the Miami New Times,

This tells you all you need to know about DeFeded. The MNT is one of those ultra-liberal Rags, which doesn't do much more than bash conservatives on every other page. Although I do enjoy reading the "Savage Love" column, but thats the libertarian in me...

15 posted on 07/28/2005 7:03:38 AM PDT by Paradox (I just neutered my cat, now he's a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper

The federal law makes it unlawful to record telephone conversations except in one party consent cases which permit one party consent recording by state law. What that means is a person can record their own telephone conversations without the knowledge or consent of the other party in those states that allow one party consent.


16 posted on 07/28/2005 7:04:54 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper; battlegearboat
It's a federal violation - so it's illegal in OK. also.

Not true. Federal law permits one-party consent, meaning you can record your own conversations, or someone else's conversations, so long as at least one party consents to the recording. Florida is a two-party consent state, though, meaning both parties must consent to the recording for it to be legal under state law. Oklahoma is a one-party consent state, FWIW - read more here.

Where it gets complicated is if the phone call crosses state lines from a one-party consent state to a two-party consent state, but it doesn't sound like that happened here.

17 posted on 07/28/2005 7:04:59 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

It is legal in Texas to record your telephone conversations. But I don't know about calls which cross the State line.


18 posted on 07/28/2005 7:05:49 AM PDT by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I know, I was just smartin' off because I joined a week before you did.

Ease up, Dude:)

19 posted on 07/28/2005 7:06:02 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
It's a federal violation - so it's illegal in OK. also.

No it is not illegal in Oklahoma. Federal law forbids telephone recordings by a third party when neither of the two principal parties on the conversation have consented.

Oklahoma, along with 37 other states, is a "one party consent" state, which means that if one party agrees to the recording (in this case the reporter) it is legal under federal law. Florida, along with 11 other states, is a "two party consent" state.

20 posted on 07/28/2005 7:06:40 AM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson