Posted on 07/29/2005 4:01:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - President Bush intends to announce next week that he is going around Congress to install embattled nominee John Bolton as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, senior administration officials said Friday.
Bush has the power to fill vacancies without Senate approval while Congress is in recess. Under the Constitution, a recess appointment during the lawmakers' August break would last until the next session of Congress, which begins in January 2007.
Two officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because the president had not made the announcement and Congress wasn't in recess yet, said Bush planned to exercise that authority before he leaves Washington on Tuesday for his ranch. The House recessed on Thursday and the Senate's break was scheduled to begin later Friday.
Earlier in the day, White House press secretary Scott McClellan gave the strongest indication yet that Bush planned to do so, noting that the U.N. General Assembly has its annual meeting in mid-September.
"It's important that we get our permanent representative in place," he said. "This is a critical time and it's important to continue moving forward on comprehensive reform."
Bush counselor Dan Bartlett said the president had not made a decision on whether to make a recess appointment.
"He retains that right to do, but he will continue to work with the Senate as long as he can," Barlett said. "But he has not made a decision."
On the other hand, an end run around the Senate confirmation process would certainly annoy senators — particularly Democrats — at a time when Bush's nomination of John Roberts to serve on the Supreme Court hangs in the balance. It also could hamper Bolton at the United Nations, by sending him there as a short-timer without the Senate's backing.
"There's just too much unanswered about Bolton and I think the president would make a truly serious mistake if he makes a recess appointment," Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record) of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said in an interview.
Bolton's nomination, announced in March by the president, was controversial from the start and has been stalled in the Senate by Democrats.
Critics say Bolton, who has been accused of mistreating subordinates and has been openly skeptical about the United Nations, would be ill-suited to the sensitive diplomatic task at the world body. The White House says the former undersecretary of state for arms control, who has long been one of Bush's most conservative foreign policy advisers, is exactly the man to whip the United Nations into shape.
This week, critics raised a fresh concern, saying Bolton had neglected to tell Congress he had been interviewed in a government investigation into faulty prewar intelligence on Iraq.
The State Department said Thursday that Bolton was interviewed in 2003 by the department inspector general. The office was conducting a joint investigation with the CIA into allegations that Iraq attempted to buy nuclear materials from Niger. Bolton had earlier submitted a questionnaire to the Senate in which he had said he had not testified to a grand jury or been interviewed by investigators in any inquiry over the past five years.
Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee (news, bio, voting record) said he would vote against Bolton — if given the chance — and would oppose a recess appointment if it is accurate that Bolton's form was originally incorrect. "Any intimidation of the facts, or suppression of information getting to the public which led us to the war, absolutely should preclude him from a recess appointment," said Chafee, of Rhode Island.
Also Friday, 35 Democratic senators and one independent, Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont, sent a letter to Bush urging against a recess appointment. "Sending someone to the United Nations who has not been confirmed by the United States Senate and now who has admitted to not being truthful on a document so important that it requires a sworn affidavit is going to set our efforts back in many ways," the letter said.
Bravo, W.
---------
LOLOL .. Too funny. the dems (and Indie JJ) worried about documents..
Good. Time to play hardball. Screw the Democrats and Lincoln Chafee, though I repeat myself.
Just do it!
The speed with which W gave it to the dog to play with would have Einstein believing in FTL travel.
Or the TRUTH! Most of them run to the microphone and cameras DAILY to LIE THROUGH THEIR TEETH to the "AMERICAN PEOPLE". Who do they think they are kidding?!!!
See the UN get de-Kofinated.
Bolton was packing and not available for comment.
Can anyone tell me why he didn't do it over July 4th recess?
36 Dems...wow..a minority and Bolton would have majority vote. Go W Go
What was he packing? A 9mm or a 40?
Charles Krauthammer, on 'Special Report', said it was a done deal.
If he could get a vote, no recess appointment would be needed. Seems the Dems woulda thought of that....
good
I bet this was put out by a Dem so that they have an excuse NOT to go to offcial recess......(can they do that). There is a Latin name for it, but I can't remember what it is.
I can only guess that he didn't do it then since Congress would've reconvened shortly after that to take up the matter. By doing it now, it appears the Consitution gives him all the way to January.
Thanks for the explanation.
Good. Just DO it.
Excellent. The Dem's heads will simply explode between Roberts and Bolton. Now we just need to push them over the edge with another Supreme nomination.
Bwahahahahahaha...
Precisely why he was elected.
Sounds too good to be true...
Senator Frist did GWB show you some gonads or not.
Woo Hoo! I sure hope this is true!
W allowed the rats to have an opportunity to do the right thing...now all the rats look like what they are ANTI-AMERICAN OBSTRUCTIONIST...
so in his true form...W gave all the rats his middle finger with the coming recess appointment of Mr. John Bolton.
THUMBS UP, Mr. President.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Article on Yahoo Now titled
Officials: Bush Plans to Install Bolton
This is good. Congress should have little say in foreign affairs. Congress has two jobs: to appropriate funds, and to remame French Fries "Feedom Fries"
Well, I hope he does this, and just tells the Lib's to shove it.
I don't understand the issue about his form. Apparently he said on a form that he hadn't done any formal interviews, but it turns out he did. But what difference does it make? How could it have hurt him to have mentioned he had talked to the state department?
They should turn over what he said in the interview and be done with it. It's funny that the MSM has no problem with the democrats in the house all suddenly finding they had "inadvertently" not filled out their travel forms, but assume that Bolton purposely lied.
But in order to believe he lied, you have to have some reason why he would have wanted to hide this.
This is a democrat trick. Ask lots of details about things people forget about that don't matter, and then call them liars when they don't remember.
But give yourselves a pass when you don't remember. Like when Hillary had no idea how the law firm records could have turned up in the white house residence. And nobody could remember who hired Livingstone (that was my favorite).
Precludes Bolton from a recess appointment??? I think not. Someone should tell Chaffee that he doesn't get a say in recess appointments.
Hmm, seems the Democrats have a problem: leave and have Mr Bolton appointed, or stay and vote on Judge Roberts.
"Which is more important, UN Ambassador or Supreme Court Judge? What to do, what to do?...$#!% the President for cutting into my vacation this way - doesn't he know how hard it is to oppose every move he makes when he pulls stuff like this?!"
LOL
Whatcha, whatcha gonna do about it, Joe...bad boy, bad boy, whatcha gonna do?
Leni
Thanks for the link.
LOL, very good Phil!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.