Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phsstpok
No, a scenario of appeasement is much more likely. Terrorism is called asymetrical warfare precisely because it cannot be combated sucessfully by ordinary tactics. Worse, by definition it cannot be deterred because the enemy is suicidal.

Will will not know whom to strike and anyway we will shrink from armageddon. The appeasers will point out the mindlessness of murdering a billion Muslims for the acts of an unknown few. They will rightly say that even that will not stop the next American city from going up.

The appeasers will win. Think Jimmy Carter.


42 posted on 07/31/2005 8:01:46 PM PDT by nathanbedford (Lose your borders, lose your citizenship; lose your citizenship, lose your Bill of Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
The appeasers will win. Think Jimmy Carter.

In the wake of a nuclear explosion in an American city Jimmy Carter will be lynched the next time he opens his mouth. Michael Moore and Dick Durbin will probably be running for their lives.

I'm basically predicting a complete breakdown of logical discourse and the immediate and total destruction of any and all suspected threats.

Teddy Kennedy and Calypso Louie will have minutes, not days, to live after such an event. Their best friends will beat them to death with a golf club on sight after that happens.

And anyone speaking either Arabic or French will be subject to summary execution in those days. (no one will notice the difference between Farsi and Arabic).

Think emotion, not reason.

51 posted on 07/31/2005 8:12:05 PM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson