Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An American Hiroshima?
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 8-2-05 | Jamie Glazov/Joseph Farah

Posted on 08/02/2005 5:16:46 AM PDT by SJackson

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Joseph Farah, the founder, editor and chief executive officer of WND and a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. He is also the publisher of Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, a premium, online, subscription intelligence news service.

Preview Image

FP: Joseph Farah, welcome to Frontpage Interview. It is a pleasure to have you here.

Farah: Thank you, Jamie.  

 

FP: In one of your recent G-2 bulletins, you discuss the evidence suggesting that Osama is planning what he calls an "American Hiroshima" and that he already has the means to do it. Al Qaeda has apparently already smuggled nuclear weapons into the U.S. This is simply terrifying. Can you tell us a bit about this?

 

Farah:  Several reporters and top intelligence analysts -- people including me, Yossef Bodansky, the former terrorism guru to the U.S. Congress, Paul Williams, author of the upcoming book, "The Al Qaeda Connection," and others -- have been working quietly and independently for years on this issue of al-Qaida's acquisition and plans for nuclear weapons. What's happening is that this independent work has led to surprisingly similar conclusions -- that al-Qaida has nuclear weapons, probably many of them, and that some of them, according to a variety of sources, have already been smuggled into this country using our porous borders and with the help of criminal enterprises like the MS-13 gang.

 

There is no question, based on captured documents and captured al-Qaida leaders that Osama bin Laden has been planning his "American Hiroshima" for many years -- long before Sept. 11, 2001. When you hear U.S. officials -- from President Bush, to Vice President Dick Cheney, to the head of the FBI and Homeland Security all telling us about the "inevitability" of a terrorist attack on the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction, this is what they are talking about. They haven't come right out and made the announcements about what they know is the threat because they have determined it might create a panic. We're not reporting anything the White House doesn't know. We're not reporting anything the CIA doesn't know. We're not reporting anything the FBI doesn't know. We're just reporting what the American people don't know. And since the government is doing next to nothing to protect the American people, it seems appropriate to let them in on the dirty little secret.

 

There is a major threat to the U.S. civilian population from al-Qaida's existing nuclear arsenal -- and, based on the evidence, I believe some of that arsenal has already been delivered to this country.

 

FP: What are Al Qaeda's prime targets? Why? 

 

 Farah:  Again, according to captured documents and captured al-Qaida leaders -- and some defectors -- the plans are to detonate multiple nuclear weapons in major U.S. cities -- either all at once or over a period of days. You can guess most of the prime targets -- New York, Washington, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc. The only surprise, according to my sources, is that al-Qaida's list is not based on the cities with the most population. The list is based on where most American Jews live. So you see some cities like Miami and Las Vegas and San Francisco on the list. Dates are very important to al-Qaida, as we have come to know, and one of the dates mentioned in connection with this "American Hiroshima" plan is Aug. 6, the anniversary of the U.S. nuclear attack on Hiroshima in 1945. No year has been set, but it is worth noting that this Aug. 6th is the 60th anniversary of that attack.

 

FP: If Al Qaeda really perpetrated this horror, what would be the result?

 

Farah:  Thre's an old joke that goes: "One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day." Even one nuclear detonation in a major U.S. city, of course, would mean not only the deaths of potentially millions, but it would wreak havoc on the U.S. economy -- which is a always a goal with bin Laden.  He doesn't want to just kill Americans. He wants to defeat the USA. He wants to bring us to our knees. And he wants to give all the glory to Allah. 

 

FP: Could you expand a bit on the sources for this information? How do we know they are reliable? 

 

Farah:  Personally, I have been working on this project for nearly four years. This story has not come together all at once. It has come together piecemeal over that period of time. I have had what I consider to be credible sourcing on 95 percent of this for quite awhile. I withheld it from publication because I couldn't even believe it myself. I didn't and don't want it to be true. I have no desire to be right about this. I want very badly to be wrong. This is not a story that can advance my reputation, credibility, career or business interests. If I'm wrong, which I hope I am, people may some day laugh at me. I will gratefully accept that. If I'm right, nobody is going to be saying, "Gee, that Farah told it like it was." They will be focused on the national disaster that has struck us -- just as I will be. About 90 percent of the information I have gathered on this plan is from publicly sourced documents available to you and anyone else who wants to spend the time looking for them. It's only the analysis and interpretation that requires skilled -- and sometimes unnamed -- intelligence sources.  

 

FP: Tell us a bit about Al Qaeda’s cooperation with the Russians on this matter.

 

Farah: I don't know of any official cooperation with the Russian government. But al-Qaida has purchased the services of former KGB officers and former Spetznaz special forces troops with knowledge of maintaining and detonating the nuclear weapons it has obtained from the former Soviet Union. In addition, Russia is playing a very dangerous game in continuing to conceal the whereabouts of nuclear weapons planted on U.S. soil during the Cold War. Al-Qaida is furiously looking for these weapons with the help of those Russian agents it has procured for a price. If Russia wanted to save the world from this potential holocaust, it could contribute by telling the U.S. government where the nukes are buried -- before al-Qaida finds them. There is a very strong likelihood that if a nuclear weapon is detonated in the U.S., it will be a Russian nuclear weapon.  

 

FP: Russia had already smuggled nuclear weapons into this country? How come they didn’t set them off? Because of mutually assured destruction? Because communism crumbled in Russia and the Cold War came to an end? How come the Russians haven’t disclosed their location? Because they still see us as potential enemies and are saving the nukes for a rainy day?

 

Farah: I believe the simple doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction did keep an uneasy peace between the USA and Soviet Union for a generation.  But today Russia needs to tell the U.S. where those nukes are buried. It is an ongoing act of war to conceal these weapons of mass destruction in our country. Too many defectors have confirmed their presence on our soil. We need explanations from the Russians. To date they have even tried to deny they ever made suitcase nukes.  President Bush needs to use his relationship with Vladimir Putin to get to the truth before it is too late. How would we respond as a nation to a nuclear terrorist attack in our country knowing the weapons used against us originated in Russia? Would Russia not be accountable in any way?

 

At least one high-ranking Russian KGB agent said indeed that some in his country still believe war between our countries is "inevitable" so the weapons must remain concealed. That is, to say the least, unacceptable.

 

FP: How did we get here? Could this have been prevented?

 

Farah: Since the reports indicate the nuclear devices came across the Mexican border -- along with thousands of sleeper al-Qaida agents -- it seems apparent to me that we have left our back door wide open. We have used our military to project force around the world, but we have not secured the perimeter. If there is a major terrorist act in this country again -- something equivalent to 9-11 or worse, President Bush will have no one to blame but himself. No longer will we be able to look back at the failings of the Clinton administration over eight years -- and there were many -- that led to Sept. 11. Bush has been in power now for five years. It was his decision not to secure the borders. 

 

FP: Why wouldn’t the Bush administration secure our borders? What are the advantages of leaving them unsecured? Is it too politically incorrect to secure them?

 

Farah: I've asked this question myself over and over. It is the most frequently asked question I hear from my radio audience and from the thousands of emails I receive from readers. President Bush candidly said it was a matter of cheap labor a few months ago. I believe that is dead wrong. I don't believe there is anything cheap about this labor. It is bankrupting our health-care system. It is taking jobs away from law-abiding American citizens. It is raising crime rates and it is threatening our national security.

 

No, I believe there is another more sinister reason. There is a master plan for global governance being plotted in meetings of groups like the Council on Foreign Relations. You can read its reports. And, I believe this open-borders policy is a direct result of those plans, which have been secretly adopted by our highest leaders, including President Bush.  

 

FP: This scenario and information is all truly horrifying. Is there anything you can tell us that would give us grounds for optimism? Is there any hope? What can be done to prevent an American Hiroshima from transpiring, for by the evidence you present, it seems inevitable.

 

Farah: Pray very hard.   

 

FP: I hear you Mr. Farah. I would never dismiss prayer – for gizzillions of reasons. But apart from prayer, my friend, what can we do? This seems so hopeless because I want to suggest that we announce that mutually assured destruction will come into effect immediately if we are hit, but then. . . .who the hell do we target in a revenge attack? We can’t blow up a city of the enemy because there is no city of the enemy and as a civilized democracy we simply can’t do anything of this nature. Or can we? Must we make some kind of barbarian threats that might deter these terrorists? I can’t see how because, unlike the communists, they aren’t even interested in self-preservation anyway. They want to die. This is truly depressing. Do you have any suggestions besides the counsel to pray?

 

Farah: Raising awareness of the problem certainly gives the American people the option of making their own contigency plans. I know people like Buffett are. I know the federal government is. Why shouldn't the American people be made starkly aware of the impending threat? 

 

FP: As you are aware, Dr. Jack Wheeler has argued that this whole thing – the Al Qaeda plan “American Hiroshima”etc. – is a hoax. He says it is total nonsense that Soviet suitcase nukes are here in the U.S., that there were no cell phones in 1988 (to trigger them), etc. I must admit his argument that Osama would never use a nuclear bomb even if he had one because we have thousands to strike back is not quite convincing. We have no one to strike back in this terror war (in terms of a country) and Osama and his ilk aren’t particularly afraid of death. Aside from this, can you deal a bit with his dismissing of the claims?

 

Farah: I love Jack, but the cell phone is 30 years old. I had a cell phone in 1988. Jack's memory is a little faulty here. All one really needs to do is listen to people like President Bush, Dick Cheney, Warren Buffett and others who say not only is it possible, it is "inevitable" that nuclear terrorism will happen. 

 

FP: Well, before we go, let me try this one more time and in a different way: suppose we all become starkly aware of the impending threat. Besides praying, is there anything we can actually do about it? Please give us some hope.

 

Farah: I don't use the term "inevitable." As a Christian, I don't like that term. But that's what Bush, Cheney, Ridge and many other public officials have said. I would like us, as a nation, as a people, to try to prevent it. Maybe it's that feeling of inevitability that has our public officials paralyzed. At the very least, we can minimize the impact of a future attack by denying the terrorists easy continued entry into this country by closing the borders. We should demand of our Russian friends that they come clean -- privately would be OK -- about the buried nukes in the U.S. We should get serious about the threat from within this country posed by terrorists operating within the confines of mosques and charities. We should stop discriminating against Arab Jews at the FBI, in military intelligence and in law enforcement in this country. They are fluent in the language and culture of our enemies and that would be of immense help to our national security. We must get on a war footing and enlist the help of the American people in combating this enemy. There are many things we can do -- even though the hour is late.

 

FP:  Can you tell us a bit about the discrimination against Arab Jews at the FBI and other law enforcement agencies in this country? Why would this be happening? It makes absolutely no sense. Why do we like hiring enemies instead of friends?

 

Farah: We have many documented reports of Arab-American FBI translators who speak approvingly of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida being retained and relied on for sensitive intelligence-collecting positions. At the same time we have documented reports of Arab Jews -- people who fled for their lives from Iraq, Syria and other Arab countries being systematically denied those same translating positions. Why? Apparently because they might have loyalty to Israel! It is blatant anti-Semitism being demonstrated by the U.S. government. Not only is it a self-destructive and counter-intuitive operation, it is blatantly illegal. But it continues still.

 

Just think how many Arab Jews there are in this country who know the language and know the culture. Why aren't we tapping that resource? Some 750,000 Jews were expelled from the Arab countries in the last 50 years. Not all of them went to Israel. Many of them live right here in the U.S.

 

FP: Mr. Farah, it was a pleasure to have you here with us today. Thank you for coming to share this vital and traumatizing information. We won’t blame the messenger. Take care my friend.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedanukes; americanhiroshima; binladen; bodansky; bordersecurity; illegalaliens; invasionusa; jihad; jihadinamerica; jihadists; josephfarah; kgb; kookswithnukes; loosenukes; marasalvatrucha; ms13; nukes; openborders; russiannukes; sleepercells; spetznaz; suitcasenukes; waronterror; wmd; wot; wwiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-89 last
To: RSmithOpt
" Will it be 100%, no, but it will sure as hell slow down the criminal activity element."

LMAO! Dream on. Anyone can, at anytime slip across the Canadian border, along either coast, and Mexico. Are you going to wall off the entire country? One big prison complex? Put a roof over it and call it an insane asylum.

One doesn't even have to crawl through mosquito infested bogs, and forrest choked thickets to cross the border. just wait for the border guards to go home at some locations, and drive over the rubber cones they put on the road.

The answer is as mentioned above, we must fight this war over there, but we have to have the will to do it, which as we can see just isn't there. Maybe it will be there after we take a few hits, and quit trying to fight a PC war.

51 posted on 08/02/2005 7:32:21 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Looks like Joseph Farah is looking to be the new Art Bell.


52 posted on 08/02/2005 8:02:35 AM PDT by Dean Baker (Two wrongs may not make a right, but three lefts do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Oops. lol.


53 posted on 08/02/2005 8:09:13 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Well, from my training in strategic tactics, soldiers are trained in tactics to protect their flanks and to keep a good eye on your 6. Otherwise, you set yourself up for a sucker punch.

Either spend the money for physical border barriers and more patrol personnel, or just 'French yourself' to the enemy over the problem.

I see no problems with the US suspending all foreign aid until the barriers and personnel are in place and diverting that money to a more worthy cause.

54 posted on 08/02/2005 8:27:32 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Judging the response when Cong. Tancredo made his comments, I would say you are right. We don't have the will. We don't even have the will to spell out to them what the consequences of such an act would be. We didn't have the will to kick them out of our country after 9/11. And obviously, we don't have the will to rid our country of these vipers before they can act again.


55 posted on 08/02/2005 10:09:54 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Perhaps there's a Julian/Gregorian Calendar misunderstanding.


56 posted on 08/02/2005 10:16:27 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DB
I don't know. If literally LA or NY was gone in a flash with millions dead there would be no limit to our rage.

I agree, while we are as a nation generous, companionate, reasonable and generally wise, we are also quite capable of unleashing unspeakable horror when the situation calls for it.

What may seem unthinkable to us today may tomorrow seem like a measured and reasonable response to a crisis situation. This is not a country to back into a corner. Even I fear what a frightened and vengeful America could unleash.

57 posted on 08/02/2005 11:58:42 AM PDT by usurper (Correct spelling is overrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dean Baker

Not if, but when.


58 posted on 08/02/2005 12:02:33 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
No offense to Joseph Farah fans, but wasn't he one of the Y2K alarmists a few years ago?

Doesn't matter if he was. This is a different scenario that is confirmed by lots of other sources not connected to WND and Farrah, even by Putin himself in a veiled threat several years ago contained in a speech directed at the US, in which he said that some of the tactical nukes that disappeared from Russia's inventory after the fall of the USSR could end up in the "wrong hands".

Defected former soviet KGB and military people have confirmed this as well, such as Col. Lunev.

That Al Kayda has nukes is kind of old news actually.

59 posted on 08/02/2005 12:05:48 PM PDT by Mister_Diddy_Wa_Diddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TypeZoNegative
If they want to make an American Hiroshima, they better damn well be prepared for an "Islamic Atlantis". Nuke them until the Arabic tetonic plate sinks into the ocean.

It's been well known around DC and other circles that soon after 9-11, Bush sent a message to Osama that should another attack take place on his watch, that Mecca would be turned into a sheet of green glass.

Odds are that Osama is waiting for Bush to leave office.

60 posted on 08/02/2005 12:14:37 PM PDT by Mister_Diddy_Wa_Diddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DB

if NY or LA went up in ball of fire, GOP could do anything they wanted and still win next election, millions of demoncrat votes would disappear instantly.


61 posted on 08/02/2005 12:19:19 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thank you.

Bump


62 posted on 08/02/2005 12:22:26 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp Meet YOUR Communist party members in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Dates are very important to al-Qaida, as we have come to know, and one of the dates mentioned in connection with this "American Hiroshima" plan is Aug. 6, the anniversary of the U.S. nuclear attack on Hiroshima in 1945. No year has been set, but it is worth noting that this Aug. 6th is the 60th anniversary of that attack."

They also go by an Islamic calendar, dumbass.
63 posted on 08/02/2005 12:41:11 PM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldleft
They also go by an Islamic calendar, dumbass.

Which means little or nothing to most Westerners, to whom he (may the sand of a thousand deserts lodge in his skivvies) is trying to make the ultimate point, sir. When you're trying to reach someone, you have to understand their symbolism.

64 posted on 08/02/2005 12:44:54 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

What does that have to do with making a point? That was one of the first lines I read, and it tainted the whole article. I don't think this guy knows what the hell he's talking about. Buried Russian nukes in the US? How have they maintained them? how have we not detected the radiation? It makes no sense.

On the other hand, if you have a platform and yell "AL QEADA HAS NUKES!" it'll get you noticed!


65 posted on 08/02/2005 12:48:24 PM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

So your going to build an electrified wall across the entire southern and northern borders? And on all the coastal areas too?

Reducing crime is one thing.

Reducing the chance of a nuclear device going off here is entirely something else. If your solution for that is the wall, it will be a total failure.


66 posted on 08/02/2005 1:00:51 PM PDT by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One
"A number of American psychics, including a few who are born-again Christians....,"

A truly "born again" Christian can't be a "psychic" per Deuteronomy 18. Being "a psychic" is the practice of divination, which The Lord does NOT take kindly to. Whatever follows then, is discredited, as it's NOT God that he's hearing from.

67 posted on 08/02/2005 1:27:14 PM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (...or the false prophet at the very least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; Maceman
I would have to agree with Maceman.

Much if not all of the Muslim world views America as nothing but a "paper tiger" that would be unable to respond when such a thing happens.

68 posted on 08/02/2005 1:46:53 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB

What war?
The one we are losing to Mexico?

We aren't even fighting.


69 posted on 08/02/2005 1:48:30 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: badpacifist
I don't put too much stock in prophetic dreams, but OTOH, I made a conscious decision to live waaay outside Atlanta. Just in case. Better quality of life too.
70 posted on 08/02/2005 2:05:01 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
Because to me, this article seems to have only two possible purposes: actually warn us of a real threat, or make us have terrible feelings about Jews. Frankly, I think it is the latter.

I may not agree with Farrar's conclusions here, but there is no anti-semitism. You'll note Farrar's strong condemnation of what he claims is the exclusion of Arab Jews from sensitive national security posts.

71 posted on 08/02/2005 2:17:47 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"There is a master plan ... being plotted in meetings ...the Council on Foreign Relations. ... this open-borders policy is a direct result of those plans, which have been secretly adopted by our highest leaders, including President Bush."

Great. Farah's a kook. I never knew that.

72 posted on 08/02/2005 2:49:58 PM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (...or the false prophet at the very least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

I had googled for the 'dream' and was just posting it when i saw your post. I am now bummed out.


73 posted on 08/02/2005 7:41:57 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NormB; All

74 posted on 08/02/2005 7:43:16 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bitt

WooHoo! Thank you!


75 posted on 08/02/2005 7:48:47 PM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
"if NY or LA went up in ball of fire,... millions of demoncrat votes would disappear instantly."

You can't POSSIBLY be that naive. Since when does a little issue like death prevent a democrat from voting?

76 posted on 08/02/2005 11:08:22 PM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (...or the false prophet at the very least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kharaku
"9/11 was relatively small, extremly alarming, but tiny compared to say, a whole city. If DC were turned into a parking lot, you can bet there'd be political will to wipe Mecca off the map"

Not until after all the vaporized leaders were replaced.

77 posted on 08/02/2005 11:35:37 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Yes, that is true. What is also true is that our beloved New York (still in America) had more republican votes for Bush than ANY OTHER STATE. Folks should'nt forget that fact, just because they are so outnumbered there, thats still a lotta right-minded people there.


78 posted on 08/03/2005 3:57:51 AM PDT by SaintDismas (Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

Read Phyllis Schlafly's summary for a start.

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html


79 posted on 08/03/2005 5:48:04 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DB
A wall along the land borders, is basically a serious deterrent, not a cure. Walls work pretty good for prisons, do they not?

However, a much more simpler solution is for military patrols. If caught illegally in this country and after a thorough investigation to verify the perpetrator's legal or illegal presence, kids and all, are then executed by firing squad with televised action back to those around the world. It is a harsh solution, but it would be effective. Either that or put the captured illegals into labor camps for a year building the wall(s) and give them 3 hots & a cot. After one year of labor, they have the option of telling us where they came from to deport them or they can simply work 7 days a week for the next year for food and shelter; no money. Also, we need a law barring forever coming back to the country again anyone caught entering illegally; no need to apply. If the risks are too great to come into this country illegally, then most will wait to get it done legally. CAFTA just screwed us with security and immigration. Such laws can be implemented and enforced, however, seems that US businessmen and international corporations prefer the US turn a blind eye as to exploit slave (cheap) labor to improve their bottoms lines and bonuses.

I know it all sounds a little crazy, but as of now, no punishment is being handed to those coming in illegally. We have the money available to build the wall and fence. I guess we should let all the US criminals out of jail now as we now have no effective means, ugggh....I mean an unwilling government, to stop foreign criminals from simply walking across our borders. Can't discriminate can we? IMHO, anyone against implementation of illegal entry deterrents is a bleeding heart liberal, currently using illegal labor for their own gain, or simply doesn't really care.

BTW, how would a physical electronically monitored barrier to keep people and vehicles from simply driving over the borders be a total failure with respect to security? Security of coastal areas are another issue entirely. Unsecured borders is a big problem. It is impossible to instantaneously remove all radicals around the world that want to terrorize the US with a nuke detonation and attempt to bring us one here for the fireworks. So, I guess it's cheaper to rebuild the downtown of a major city after a nuke detonation than to erect a wall/fence combo and forget innocent folks perishing in the process?

I'd like to hear your solution on increasing border security or are you simply content to just let a nuke or dirty bomb detonate and hope it's not where you live?

One final note, I don't like the situation at all, however, it has been forced upon us in this country, so, how do we improve the situation? Keep in mind also, 2/3 of those in this world want to live next door and work next door to you and me. Is there enough room and water for that to happen and are US citizens responsible for every individuals economic, physical, educational, and spiritual demise?

Please forgive what may sound as a harsh tone as a reply to you, it is not a personal attack on you or your comment. I'm just more fed up with the Fed's, states' and locals' BS and unwillingness to enforce our current laws as they have been sworn to uphold, that's all.

80 posted on 08/03/2005 5:54:03 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

Phyllis Schlafly has written a summary(sourced) explaining exactly why nothing will be done to protect the borders.

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html

Remember her?

Friend of Reagan and Conservative Icon.


81 posted on 08/03/2005 10:04:08 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: kharaku

Quote: If DC were turned into a parking lot, you can bet there'd be political will to wipe Mecca off the map.



I would also guess PC would immediately go out the window and all muslims would be rounded up and detained.


82 posted on 08/03/2005 10:14:47 AM PDT by superiorslots (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Thank you for the link.


83 posted on 08/03/2005 10:59:00 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Read the article. I already was aware of corporate America's major influence on the lack of enforcement, not to mention huge international companies that have no allegiance to any country, just their bottom line. Corporate leaders love their idols: The Delusion of Perceived Power and Control and An Account Number.
84 posted on 08/03/2005 11:04:27 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

"I would also guess PC would immediately go out the window and all muslims would be rounded up and detained."

PC is dying now, albeit a little too slow for my tastes. But you are right a nuke in any US city and PC will only be a bad memory. It would be a very bad time for any Mid-Eastern person in this country.


85 posted on 08/03/2005 11:08:11 AM PDT by DarthVader (Islam is not something to be understood, it is something that must be utterly destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

"Great. Farah's a kook. I never knew that."

No he is NOT!!! If he is then so is President Bush, who has been talking about Nucular (bad spelling intended) attacks for years, so has Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condonlizza Rice, and everyone else in the government who has studied terrorism at all.

Mr Farah is simply trying to get the word out, and my personal opinion on the timing is simply because he believes by publishing the intended dates, that perhaps Osama won't nuke us on those days because he wants an element of surprise.

But nuke us he will, and it is time for us to take the blinders off and simply prepare. Preparations are not so difficult, and the first step is simply to get educated on the facts and then put in a few supplies. It also helps to learn the facts versus the myths of nuclear warfare, as well as understand that we the people have been LETHARGIC about the true state of our world and what needs to happen in terms of Civil Defense.

Here are a few links to get you all started...

http://www.oism.org/nwss/s73p914.htm

http://www.oism.org/nwss/s73p916.htm

http://healthandenergy.com/an_american_hiroshima.htm

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/7/15/01030.shtml


Jenny Hatch

PS
Y2K was NOT a non-event. Business spent 100 BILLION dollars to fix the problem, I know because I watched the numbers very closely, and my husband worked personally on the problem for his company as a computer engineer. The money spent on Y2K contributed to the dot.com fiasco, and to say that Farah encouraging people to get prepared for a potential Y2K disaster means he has no credibility is just bunk. Y2K could have been a huge disaster without the whisteblowers sounding the alarm a couple years before it happened.

PPSS For Jesus's warning about what is going to happen in the future just read Matthew 24. All Christians and bible believers should be preparing for a time of societal chaos.

The difference between President Bush and Joseph Farah is that Farah has had the guts to publish a potential date along with his information, a date that is three days away....I'm sure this was a difficult decision to make, knowing that he could be heckled and dissed for even suggesting it, but the fact is that Muslim extremists have wanted to nuke the US for a long, long time... If not saturday, then perhaps another time...


86 posted on 08/03/2005 12:58:44 PM PDT by Jenny Hatch (Jenny Hatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jenny Hatch
Oh, I didn't mean for a moment that the nuclear threat itself is kooky, that's ominously plausable.

This is what I mean by a kook.

I meant Farah's reference to the tinfoil-hat conspiracy stuff. The conspiracy bunch believes that there's one small group of people that controls everything, and that each election is fixed in advanced, decided in some smokey backroom, years in advance. The Federal Reserve's in on it, the FBI, CIA, the Rockefellers, and of course the mainstream press. Both Bush and his dad are in on it, and are puppets of the "secret committee."

So if that's the case, why does the press hate him so much?

87 posted on 08/03/2005 10:09:33 PM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (...or the false prophet at the very least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

but everything IS a conspiracy....right?

Hee Hee

Jenny

PS Chortled out loud when I read your user name.


88 posted on 08/03/2005 10:35:36 PM PDT by Jenny Hatch (Jenny Hatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman




Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD





the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD


madhillary.com (coming soon)
madhillary.blogspot.com
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

MAD hillary talks series #1
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON
+ CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE
MAD hillary talks series #2
HILLARY'S
MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET



Do you really want THAT finger
on the button?

MAD hillary talks series #3
"What, me worry?"



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE

MAD hillary talks series #4
NANO-PRESIDENT



the danger of the unrelenting smallness
of bill + hillary clinton

MAD hillary talks series #5
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO



how the clintons are handling
the hillary dud factor



deletehillary.blogspot.com
virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005




89 posted on 08/07/2005 6:02:01 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson