Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Why wouldn?t the Bush administration secure our borders? What are the advantages of leaving them unsecured?...

Google search CFR North American Community.


5 posted on 08/02/2005 5:24:15 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Simply because it is a waste of resources. It is impossible to effectively seal our borders. There are thousands of miles of rugged unsecured border with Canada and thousands of miles of coast line not to mention thousands of shipping containers entering our country everyday. Anyone seriously wanting to get in can. We can't win the war here. We have to win it there.


11 posted on 08/02/2005 5:32:18 AM PDT by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Bush is a globalist. His pal V. Fox spilled the beans. "Mexico, the United States, and Canada, will unite under one umbrella, with U.S. wages falling to meet Mexico's rising wages".

No one will connect the dots and realize that V. Fox would not be shooting his mouth off unless it had already been discussed and agreed to.

As far as this article goes, be very afraid. Especially now that Muslims in America are beginning to decry terrorism. They admit that this declaration has alot to do with Muslims being afraid of retaliation should there be another major attack on the USofA.

The very issuance of this declaration makes me believe there is something in the air in the Muslim community.

32 posted on 08/02/2005 6:16:29 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson