Skip to comments.
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
Drudge Report ^
| August 3, 2005
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 08/04/2005 8:48:41 AM PDT by kennedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 781-789 next last
1
posted on
08/04/2005 8:48:42 AM PDT
by
kennedy
To: kennedy
2
posted on
08/04/2005 8:49:45 AM PDT
by
JimWforBush
(Alcohol - For the best times you'll never remember)
To: kennedy
3
posted on
08/04/2005 8:49:47 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: kennedy
One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”Wanna bet?
4
posted on
08/04/2005 8:50:14 AM PDT
by
THX 1138
To: kennedy
Well the NY Slimes sinks even lower, as if that were even possible.
Good for the NY Times. Showing their true character, again. Good scoop by Drudge....
6
posted on
08/04/2005 8:51:09 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: kennedy
Hmmmmm...seems that the Chelsea Clinton standard no longer applies...
7
posted on
08/04/2005 8:51:24 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
(Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you dont have to...." ;)
To: kennedy
Guess they couldn't find anything damning in the Roberts' Blockbuster rental records.
8
posted on
08/04/2005 8:51:40 AM PDT
by
scottinoc
To: kennedy
and exactly what is the nytimes trying to find? this is total crap.
To: kennedy
The N.Y.Slimes ................ All that wasted paper and print just so my parrot doesn't stain the bottom of his cage.
10
posted on
08/04/2005 8:52:37 AM PDT
by
shadeaud
(Liberals suffer from acute interior cornial craniorectoitis)
To: kennedy
This is an outrage! They have stooped lower than low! I cannot imagine the NYT scum getting any lower! This is the most despicable thing I've ever heard of! I am angry as hell!..........
11
posted on
08/04/2005 8:53:24 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Want to be surprised? GOOOOGLE your own name. Want to have fun? GOOOOGLE your neighbor's......)
To: kennedy
Pathetic.
It's all in congruence with the dems' call for non-partisan co-operation. Liars.
12
posted on
08/04/2005 8:53:25 AM PDT
by
msf92497
(My brain is "twitchy")
To: kennedy
13
posted on
08/04/2005 8:53:28 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
(Remember the Mog.)
To: kennedy
To: texianyankee
They want to construct some fantasy where he had an affair with an illegal alien blah blah...
To: kennedy
This is going way too far. Leave his kids out of it.
16
posted on
08/04/2005 8:53:54 AM PDT
by
Mathews
(Shot... Splash... Out!)
To: kennedy
We need all the e-mail addresses for the Slimes. These guys need to be bombarded for this crap.
To: texianyankee
and exactly what is the nytimes trying to find? this is total crap. Well, the lefties were calling for an investigation of adopted son Jack (age 4) to determine if he is gay.
To: scottinoc
Guess they couldn't find anything damning in the Roberts' Blockbuster rental records. I'm thinking he didn't have any overdue library books either... LOL
19
posted on
08/04/2005 8:54:21 AM PDT
by
mysto
("I am ZOT proof" --- famous last words of a troll.)
To: kennedy
And they wonder why their circulation continues to tank. Hey, why not just dig up his relatives and test their DNA too? I mean, we just have to know if Roberts was a legitimate child.
20
posted on
08/04/2005 8:54:28 AM PDT
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 781-789 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson