Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Fud
Here's the nut of the matter:

"The case for homosexual sodomy is not weak under the Court’s reading of the Constitution — it is extraordinarily strong. Hence the argument is very powerful, on logical grounds, for an expansive interpretation of its meaning and scope, which lends support to Muth’s view that the right should encompass consensual adult incest as well."

Let the black-robed vultures squirm their way out of this one.

9 posted on 08/04/2005 12:55:33 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto

So what if said siblings were only engaging in sodomy, would that then be protected?


34 posted on 08/04/2005 2:22:14 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson