Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. backs Iran civilian nuke program for first time
Reuters ^ | Fri Aug 5,

Posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:53 PM PDT by F14 Pilot

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States on Friday for the first time accepted that Iran can develop civilian nuclear programs, backing an EU proposal that would allow Tehran to pursue atomic power in exchange for giving up fuel work.

In a compromise that completed a gradual shift in U.S. policy, Washington acquiesced because it believes the EU offer has enough safeguards to prevent Iran diverting its civilian work into making nuclear bombs.

"We support the (Europeans') effort and the proposal they have put forward to find a diplomatic solution to this problem and to seek an end to Iran's nuclear weapons program," State Department spokesman Tom Casey told reporters.

The U.S. acquiescence over Iran is in contrast with its stance in talks with North Korea, which it insists cannot have any nuclear development for fear Pyongyang would build atomic bombs under the guise of a civilian power program.

The shift also comes despite long-held U.S. worries that allowing a civilian program could help Iran develop its nuclear technology and know-how so that, if it ever breaks any EU agreement, it would be closer to acquiring a bomb.

A U.S. official said the EU offer helped allayed American fears.

"There's a certainty and an ability to ensure that none of the nuclear fuel that would be involved is diverted to an illicit nuclear weapons program," said the official, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to discuss details of the proposal.

MOSCOW MODEL

The EU -- represented by Britain, France and Germany -- has held talks for two years with Iran to find a compromise between arch foes Iran and the United States.

Washington accuses Iran of trying to covertly build a nuclear bomb. Tehran says its programs are peaceful and that it has the right to convert and enrich uranium, which can be used for power generation or to build bombs.

The U.S. opposition to nuclear power plants has eroded this year.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has increasingly pointed to a power plant deal between Russia and Iran as an example of how to limit the risk from a civilian program because Moscow controls the fuel.

But while the United States had accepted such an arrangement under the existing deal, until Friday it had not explicitly agreed to the principle that Iran could have a civilian program.

The EU offered to declare its "willingness to support Iran to develop a safe, economically viable and proliferation-proof civil nuclear power."

The bloc offered to guarantee supplies of fuel for light-water nuclear power reactors, but insisted Iran returned to the supplier all spent fuel, which can also be used in atomic weaponry.

"We encourage Iran to consider positively the EU3's offer," Casey said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmadi; bushehr; civilian; enrichment; eu; eu3; france; freedom; fuel; germany; iaea; impeachdubya; iran; israeliairstrikefast; moscow; nuclearfuelcycle; peaceful; plant; power; russia; terrorism; uk; un; us; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
what?
1 posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:54 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; McGavin999; freedom44; nuconvert; sionnsar; AdmSmith; parisa; onyx; Pro-Bush; Valin; ...

What is going on?


2 posted on 08/05/2005 10:00:46 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot; bitt
WTF?!!!!!
3 posted on 08/05/2005 10:01:10 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("MON CANARD EST EN FEU!!" -- http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20050620.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
If the International Community controls the Fuel Rods, There is no enrichment, without enrichment, there is no Nukes
4 posted on 08/05/2005 10:02:56 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The text of European Union’s proposals to Iran

TEHRAN – On Friday morning in Tehran, the E3 Ambassadors handed over, on behalf of France, Germany and the UK with the support of the EU High Representative, a proposal for a long-term agreement with Iran. A summary of the text is below:

1. The present negotiation between the E3/EU and Iran began in December 2004, following conclusion of the Paris Agreement on 15 November 2004.

2. The Paris Agreement says: “In the context of this suspension [by Iran of all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, including specifically all tests or production at any uranium conversion installation], the E3/EU and Iran have agreed to begin negotiations, with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on long term arrangements. The agreement will provide objective guarantees that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes. It will equally provide firm guarantees on nuclear, technological and economic cooperation and firm commitments on security issues.”

3. In October 2004, prior to the Paris Agreement, the E3/EU presented ideas to Iran on the possible shape of such a long-term agreement. Iran produced proposals in March 2005, but these were based on Iran’s early resumption of fissile material production, without a comprehensible explanation of the civilian use for the nuclear material that would be produced.

4. On 25 May 2005, E3 Foreign Ministers and Javier Solana met an Iranian delegation led by Dr Hassan Rouhani in Geneva. They agreed that the E3/EU would present comprehensive proposals for long-term arrangements, at the end of July or at the beginning of August. On 5 August, the E3/EU accordingly passed to Iran a ‘Framework for a Long-term Agreement’.

5. In an accompanying letter, the E3/EU recognize that Iran will have further ideas it will want to discuss. The letter says that, as ever, the E3/EU remain open to discussion of all proposals that could lead to the conclusion of satisfactory long-term arrangements on the basis of the Paris Agreement.

6. The Framework is long – 34 pages in English – and detailed. It sets out possible elements for a future agreement. These reflect extensive work by the E3/EU, and take into account many of the points made by Iran’s negotiators. The main points are summarized below.

I: PREAMBLE

The E3/EU propose that the preamble of a final agreement should set out the principles on which a long-term relationship between the E3/EU and Iran would be based. It would stress the importance of developing relations of trust and co-operation between the E3/EU and Iran for the preservation of international peace and stability. The E3/EU and Iran would, inter alia, recall Article IV of the NPT and the rights to the use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes contained therein. They would affirm that a final agreement on long-term arrangements providing objective guarantees that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes would lead immediately to a higher state of relations based on a process of collaboration in different areas.

II. POLITICAL & SECURITY CO-OPERATION

General principles. The E3/EU propose that in any final agreement the E3/EU and Iran would make mutual commitments in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, including to the principle of the resolution of disputes by peaceful means and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law; to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations; and to promote respect for and observance and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction of any kind.

Security Assurances. Within the context of an overall agreement and Iran’s fulfillment of its obligations under the NPT, the UK and France would be prepared to reaffirm to Iran the unilateral security assurances given on 6 April 1995 and referred to in UN Security Council Resolution 984 (1995).

Areas of special interest. As part of an overall agreement, the E3/EU propose that both parties should make commitments in the following areas:

- Non-proliferation. The E3/EU and Iran would inter alia reaffirm their commitment to abide by security and non-proliferation treaties to which they are party, and the need to strengthen compliance mechanisms; stress the importance of universal adherence to disarmament and non-proliferation treaties and of the hill implementation of the IAEA safeguards agreements and additional protocols; and reaffirm their commitment to the objective of a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.

- Regional security. As part of an overall agreement, the E3/FU would welcome an expanded dialogue with Iran on regional security issues. To this end, the E3/EU would, as part of an overall agreement, commit to working with Iran to encourage confidence- building measures and regional security arrangements. Such discussions would take place in close consultation with all the States of the region.

- Terrorism. The E3/EU and Iran would commit themselves to combating terrorism, preventing and suppressing the financing and preparations for terrorism.

- Combating drug trafficking. The E3/EU would actively support international programs designed to tackle Iran’s drug problem, including by enhancing Afghan/Iranian border police co-operation, the training of customs officers, and the development of projects on demand and harm reduction in Iran.

Implementation mechanism. The E3/FU propose the creation of a high-level committee on political and security issues, which would review progress on this part of the agreement and provide a forum for discussing issues of regional, international and mutual interest.

III. LONG-TERM SUPPORT FOR IRAN’S CIVIL NUCLEAR PROGRAMME

Principles. The E3/EU would: recognize Iran’s rights under Article IV of the NPT to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy without discrimination in conformity with its obligations under the NPT, including Iran’s right to develop a civil nuclear power generation program; declare, within the context of an overall agreement, their willingness to support Iran to develop a safe, economically viable and proliferation-proof civil nuclear power generation and research program that conforms with its energy needs; and fully support long-term co-operation in the civil nuclear field between Iran and Russia. Framework. Within the context of an overall agreement, co-operation between the E3/EU and Iran in the nuclear field would be enhanced: Iran would have access to the international nuclear technologies market where contracts are awarded on the basis of open competitive tendering. Co-operation would be conditional on Iran’s full implementation of its relevant international obligations and commitments, including the long-term arrangements agreed between the E3/EU and Iran, resolution by the IAEA of all questions raised under Iran’s Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol, and continued co-operation with the IAEA. Under UNSCR 1540, and based on respective national, European and international norms, the E3/EU and Iran are obliged to implement export controls; the E3 would commit themselves to implementing these controls in a non-discriminatory way, bearing in mind the new context that would be created by the confidence building measures and commitments undertaken by Iran under an overall agreement.

Iranian access to the international nuclear fuel market and co-operation in nuclear energy. In line with these principles, and in the context of an overall agreement and growing mutual confidence, the E3/EU would support the development of Iran’s civil nuclear program, including by helping to identify the requirement for a further research reactor in Iran, and by cooperation in other fields of peaceful use of nuclear energy, excluding fuel-cycle related activity.

The E3/EU would also support the development of co-operation in fields such as radio-isotope production, basic research and the peaceful use of nuclear energy in the fields of medicine and agriculture, and in establishing co-operation between regulatory authorities in the E3/EU and Iran and the IAEA in order to assist with the design and implementation of international standard nuclear safety and security regimes.

The E3/EU would actively support commencement of negotiations on an agreement between EURATOM and Iran.

Fuel assurances. The E3/EU recognize that Iran should have sustained access to nuclear fuel for the Light Water Reactors forming Iran’s civil nuclear industry. Russia has committed itself formally to supplying nuclear fuel for the life-time of Russian-built reactors in Iran. In order to provide Iran with additional assurances that external supplies of fuel could be relied upon in the long term, the E3/EU would develop with Iran a framework which would provide such assurance, without prejudicing any future multilateral arrangements developed under IAEA auspices. The E3/EU have proposed ways this might be achieved, including through the creation of an ad hoc mechanism and a buffer store of fuel.

Confidence building. Effective long-term co-operation between Iran and the international community in the civil nuclear field will require the continued building of confidence over a significant period. As Iran will have an assured supply of fuel over the coming years, it will be able to provide the confidence needed by making a binding commitment not to pursue fuel cycle activities other than the construction and operation of light water power and research reactors. This commitment would be reviewed jointly in line with the review mechanism envisaged for the overall agreement.

As an essential element of this mechanism for international confidence building, Iran would undertake to: make a legally binding commitment not to withdraw from the NPT and to keep all Iranian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards under all circumstances; ratify its Additional Protocol, in accordance with its existing commitment, by the end of 2005; in the meantime, fully implement the Additional Protocol pending its ratification and to co-operate with the IAEA to solve all outstanding issues; arid agree arrangements for the supply of fresh fuel from outside Iran and commit to returning all spent fuel elements to the original supplier.

In line with IAEA Board Resolutions, the E3/EU would also expect Iran to stop construction of its Heavy Water Research Reactor at Arak, which gives rise to proliferation concerns.

The E3/EU would work with Iran to establish a group to identify alternative uses for the equipment, installations, facilities and materials which would not form part of Iran’s long-term civil nuclear industry. The group could consider alternative areas of employment for the scientists, technicians and workers currently employed in these facilities.

IV. ECONOMIC & TECHNOLOGICAL CO-OPERATION

An overall agreement would lead to the development of a programme of economic and technological co-operation with Iran, complementing the envisaged EC/Iran Trade & Co-operation Agreement, which will constitute the main vehicle for the long-term development of economic relations between the EU and Iran.

In a long-term agreement, the E3/EU would:

- recognize the importance of energy co-operation to their long-term relationship with Iran. They would be prepared to make a policy declaration that they regard Iran as a long-term source of oil and gas for the EU; and take steps, including opening an EU/Iran Energy Management & Technology Centre, to develop practical cooperation;

- promote trade, investment and transfer of technology;

- work for an early conclusion of negotiations on a draft EU/Iran Trade & Co-operation Agreement and an EU/Iran Political Dialogue Agreement;

- offer continued political support for Iranian accession to the World Trade Organization, and technical support to assist Iran making the necessary technical adjustments to its economy;

- agree to convene a joint export control workshop, allowing for exchanges on the implementation on UN SCR 1540 and national/EC laws, and as a follow up be prepared to support Iran in establishing an efficient system of export controls;

- commit to developing long-term scientific and technological co-operation with Iran in certain areas, including environmental technology, communications and information technology, education and vocational training; and

- invigorate co-operation in areas such as air transport, railway transport, maritime transport, seismology, infrastructure, agriculture and the food industry, and tourism

V. REVIEW MECHANISM

The E3/EU and Iran would agree to implement the agreement in good faith. The agreement would be subject to review, at Ministerial level, every ten years. Any change to the arrangements would be subject to explicit agreement by both the E3/EU and Iran.

The E3/EU would be willing to circulate the final agreement for information and with a view to possible endorsement by the international community.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=8/6/2005&Cat=2&Num=011


5 posted on 08/05/2005 10:02:58 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
"There's a certainty and an ability to ensure that none of the nuclear fuel that would be involved is diverted to an illicit nuclear weapons program,"

Whew, now we can all relax.

6 posted on 08/05/2005 10:03:24 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

So we delay W.W. III, just long enough for the enemy to build nukes.

I don't think Israel is going to go along with this plan, I hope not anyway.


7 posted on 08/05/2005 10:04:09 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
If the International Community controls the Fuel Rods, There is no enrichment, without enrichment, there is no Nukes

I have a bridge and and oil-for-food program to sell you.

8 posted on 08/05/2005 10:04:11 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot


I have NO idea.


9 posted on 08/05/2005 10:04:20 PM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

May be we want another North Korea in the middle east?

Should we trust the Mullahs who do not trust their own people?

Why should we even trust Europeans?

I do not understand this shift of policy now


10 posted on 08/05/2005 10:04:49 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot; Slings and Arrows

I'm hoping that this is just some wild Reuters spin. (????????)


11 posted on 08/05/2005 10:05:28 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." -- G.W. Bush, regarding Sen. Kerry's lack of vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Didn't Iran already reject this?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/08/06/wiran06.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/08/06/ixportal.html


12 posted on 08/05/2005 10:05:48 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rmmcdaniell
LOL, I agree, trusting Kim Jong Ill is the major problem here. But to react to a Reuters article with any kind of seriousness is something I refuse to do
13 posted on 08/05/2005 10:06:12 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

They have oil, why do they need nuclear power?


14 posted on 08/05/2005 10:06:39 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
GWB is simply bringing Old Europe on board. Everyone knows that Tehran is going to attempt making a nuclear weapon. Doing so in violation of the EU proposal will force the EU to back U.S. military action.

This also boxes the Mullahs into accepting the EU proposal. should they refuse it, then the EU will again have to back U.S. action (probably less overt than military atacks in that case though, such as a blockade).

15 posted on 08/05/2005 10:07:08 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
The United States to give North Korea 50,000 tonnes of food aid

Bush is turning into quite the appeaser.

16 posted on 08/05/2005 10:07:09 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Check this link

http://news.google.com/?ncl=http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/05/iran.nuclear/&hl=en


17 posted on 08/05/2005 10:07:26 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

We've officially gone INSANE!


18 posted on 08/05/2005 10:07:59 PM PDT by Ranald S. MacKenzie (Its the philosophy, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

That is not a valid question!

The question is that can we trust Mullahs with nukes?

NO!

But, if there was a trusted and honest government, they could have peaceful nukes to generate electricity for their country!


19 posted on 08/05/2005 10:09:30 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Everyone knows that Tehran is going to attempt making a nuclear weapon. Doing so in violation of the EU proposal will force the EU to back U.S. military action.

Like Sadam's multiple violations forced Europe to support the Iraq war.

HARHARHARHARHAR!!

You Bush apologists never cease to amaze me.

20 posted on 08/05/2005 10:09:39 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson