Skip to comments.ACLU vs. Boy Scouts of America
Posted on 08/06/2005 10:54:07 AM PDT by concretebob
While growing up I was a proud member of an organization that emphasized the importance of honesty and "being clean in thought, word and deed." We vowed to serve God and our country. If you think that this organization's philosophy is non-controversial, you are sadly mistaken.
We live in an era of Political Correctness. The beliefs and values that our society broadly embraced when I was a member of Boy Scout Troop 77, chartered by Holy Trinity Catholic Church of Racine, Wisconsin, are now endangered.
Unfortunately, our federal courts often make decisions that assault our country's most cherished beliefs and values. Many of the nation's 3.2 million Boy Scouts and 1.2 million adult members must be hanging their heads low right now. A recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Blanche Manning in Chicago indicates how much our society has declined in understanding the difference between paying homage to God and the intermingling of church and state.
Winkler v. Chicago was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois on behalf of Methodist Minister Eugene Winkler, Rabbi Gary Gerson and others. Thanks to their misunderstanding of the separation of church and state, as well as that of Judge Manning, the Pentagon cannot use federal funds to support future National Boy Scout Jamborees such as that held last month.
The argument in this case is not that the Pentagon transfers money allocated for weapons systems to the Boy Scout Jamboree. It is that the Pentagon uses federal funds to support the event of an organization that develops our youth and acknowledges God. According to the plaintiffs and the ACLU, the Pentagon violates a fundamental stricture requiring the government to be "neutral" in religious activities although the Pentagon is authorized by Congress to support the Boy Scouts of America.
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) is a non-denominational youth organization that seeks to make young men good citizens. It does require Boy Scouts to affirm a belief in God, or any God for that matter.
Methodist Minister Eugene Winkler insisted, "Government must be neutral because we are a nation of many religious views as well as those who do not practice a religion. The expenditure of $7.3 million by the Pentagon on an organization that requires young people to affirm a belief in God and the simultaneous exclusion of secular organizations from this benefit undermines that principle of neutrality."
The ACLU argued that the money expended by the Pentagon is "alarming" because BSA distributes to Jamboree attendants a guidebook that lists a prayer book as "required personal camping equipment." BSA also distributes "Duty to God," a booklet suggesting daily prayers that could be said during the Jamboree.
What the ACLU so aggressively protests is indoctrination, but this is much ado about nothing. Devout Boy Scouts will use the prayer books and be sincere in the thoughts they express to God. Most will be sincere in what they say and do. Some Boy Scouts will not be so sincere, perhaps not even say the prayers at all. That is for God to judge.
Judge Manning in the earthly court the U.S. District Court incorrectly interpreted the Constitution. The First Amendment does not call for separation of church and state; it says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
BSA does not favor any religious denomination; the organization truly is non-denominational. This was clarified in the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the Department of Housing & Urban Development. In the motion, HUD sought to have the judge issue a ruling without a trial because the arguments of the plaintiffs, Reverend Winkler and Rabbi Gerson, were baseless. The motion said:
While a Boy Scout accepts an obligation to do one's "duty to God" and to be reverent, BSA leaves the implementation of the Scout's religious beliefs up to the Scout and his family. ... BSA encourages members to practice their religious beliefs as directed by their parents and spiritual advisors Boy Scouts leaves sectarian religious instruction to the member's religious leaders and families, does not require its members to attend or participate in any sectarian religious ceremony, welcomes young people of all religious backgrounds, and in fact includes members of every religious denomination as well as those who affiliate with no organized religion whatsoever. ... While many religious organizations "charter" Scouting units, BSA prohibits them from requiring boys who belong to other denominations or faiths to take part in or observe their religious ceremonies.
The Department of Justice has not decided whether to appeal this case. Millions of Americans who care about an organization that promotes wholesome values in our country's young boys have a vested interest. They should hope the Department would not let this egregious ruling go unchallenged.
Congress has a role to play, too. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, M.D., R-Tenn., introduced the Support Our Scouts Act (S. 642) to guarantee that Scouts shall have fair and equal access to all public facilities and forums. Senator Frist's bill would amend the Housing and Community Development Act to prohibit any state or local government from discriminating against any youth organization such as the Boy Scouts or its affiliates.
A bipartisan group of senators co-sponsored the bill, which the Senate recently approved as an amendment to the Department of Defense Authorization bill (S. 1042). Senator Frist emphasized how "proud" he was that his amendment received bipartisan support. The battle will continue within the House/Senate conference committee on the DoD authorization bill.
The ruling in this case reaffirms the need to place judges on the federal bench who are committed to interpreting the law, not actively rewriting it. The Pentagon's support of the Boy Scout Jamboree does not establish a religion and surely does not violate the First Amendment.
Many similar decisions, based upon the personal prejudices or gross misinterpretations of a judge, recently have been handed down. At risk, due to such activist-driven rulings, are beliefs and values that have united us as a country.
When the BSA finds itself in legal hot water because it wants its members to honor God, this is not the America that I knew growing up. In my youth, acknowledgement of our faith and our country's Judeo-Christian heritage was common and accepted practice. Our country has lost its moorings, and too many Americans of Christian and Jewish heritage willingly have abandoned the faith that held their forbearers in good stead.
Our nation's youth are too complacent, taking for granted what has been given them. They mistake Hollywood and sports celebrities as accomplished, not only in their performances on stage and on screen and on the playing field but also in their lifestyles. Glitz outshines living a life that truly honors God. The Boy Scouts challenge our young men to set higher goals and higher standards for themselves, including belief in God.
A federal judge has told the Boy Scouts that belief is unacceptable because the government must be "neutral." Millions of Americans do understand the importance of faith. They are not "neutral" when recognizing God and do not put a denominational stamp on faith. A Boy Scout may believe in his country, but his belief in God instills real mettle in that conviction.
Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.
Damn anti-American value sodomites!
Put an ACLU member into a foxhole or order him to run into a house with armed militants shooting at them and see if a prayer doesn't leave their lips while the pee runs down their legs. People who actually put their lives on the line in the military understand more about that prayer book than most priests do I think.
"In God We Trust" on money is on their agenda for the end of this year. ACLU.....trial lawyers.
This is clear, all the cases about monuments, The Ten Commandments, crosses on memorials, crosses on city seals, menorahs and nativity scenes on public squares are all examples of how far this mis-interpretation has driven our public life. It is high time to stand up and tell people that the constitution carrys no right to "Not Be Offended" and this is what the interpretations of the establishment clause have boiled down to. If I can see this, judges (who are far smarter then me) can see this too. Look for some incidious agenda on the part of the democrats behind these affairs, and vote them out.
They are agents for the enemy. Their day is coming.
This is sickening. But, it's the ACLU so what do we expect.
One for the Stop the ACLU ping list.
Later evil ACLU vs BSA pingout.
here is the problem. We are constantly on the defensive and at the mercy of thier organization to file law suits. We need a way to take the battle to thier offices. Thier donors, thier polititions their children. We need a piece of legislation that we can ram up thier liberal ass so hard and so fast they will be buckled and defeated.
We are sitting ducks as it is set up now.... can we sue them for infringing on our rights to persue our own Life, liberty and persuit of happiness?
Of course the ACLU particularly hates the Boy Scouts, because of another aspect of the ongoing Leftist assault on our values. (See The Boy Scouts Of America & A Leftwing Agenda.)
Ladies and Gentlemen, our world is under attack--and the greatest threat, by far, is within our midst.
Thanks for the ping!
ACLU is against any organization that tries to promote good character. They sued the National Honor Society several times for daring to use character as a criteria for membership (and apparently won, though I find this difficult to believe). They have supported pedophiles. ETC.
The ACLU is nothing but pro-death, pro-Islamofascist and pro-pedophile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.