Replies

In war, you get people who vent on all sides.

The media does not want balance. They want propaganda.

Lardball with Chris Matthews would put two guests on.

->Anti-Bush Iraq Veteran versus A Pro-Bush Non-Veteran.

It must be really difficult to find a Vet proud of their Iraq service to go up against Matthews' prop. Either that or Matthews knows the anti-Bush vet would get crushed in a debate with a pro-Bush vet.

-> The five Fetnom Communication Trained (Liberal Group) anti-Bush 9-11 widows vs. pro-Bush person with no one who died on 9-11.

Debra Burlingame is a key figure in keeping the 9-11 Memorial a memorial, but she was shut out in the 2004 Election so five widows from Jersey, who were trained by a liberal communications outfit, could speak for all 9-11 family members of victims.

-> Anti-Bush parent of a Soldier who died in Iraq versus Pro-Bush person who no ties to a soldier in Iraq.

This is an equally disgusting set up. Matthews and other liberal outlets seek to justify their own anti-war/anti-Bush position by crippling the pro-Bush supporter with someone who has no commonality with them. Matthews could find many pro-Bush parents to go up against an ati-Bush parent, but he doesn't want fairness. He and many other liberals want to push propaganda.

Ultimately, as news outlets push fake setups and fake polls, the only real numbers we get are their plummeting ratings and circulation. That reflects reality and opinion more than any biased story or fake poll produced by these people to pacify their liberal audience, justify their positions, and manipulate public opinion rather than reflect it.

It's pathetic. It will continue to be done. It will continue to fail to resonate.