Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No On Roberts (Joseph Farah Slams Conservatives For Being Bamboozled By White House Alert)
World Net Daily.com ^ | 08/08/05 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 08/07/2005 10:20:55 PM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-346 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck

BTW, Summa cum laude is top in the class, magna cum laude is with much praise but not "literally #1". Smart he may be but that is only an elemental credential as far as I am concerned.


221 posted on 08/08/2005 5:19:28 AM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

We'll divide ourselves without any help, thank you very much.


222 posted on 08/08/2005 5:21:57 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US. http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

"I may have missed what you meant, but do you agree with me that Homosexuals should not be discriminated against when it comes to housing, jobs, or eduction? I hope you do."

Of course they must be discriminated against. Your position is hideously wrongheaded. I am aghast to see such evil posted here.


223 posted on 08/08/2005 5:23:14 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Mark Levin, Justice Robert Bork, Ted Olsen and many other stellar Conservatives back Judge Roberts

And one report stated that Scalia himself supports Roberts.

If Roberts is good enough for Bork, Scalia and Olsen, why shouldn't he be good enough for us?

224 posted on 08/08/2005 5:25:28 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"You should be able to deny housing or work to any person just because you don't like the way they look, FGS, but not SPECIFICALLY because they are gay."

At the risk of being a target of your vitriol, I find the circular logic of this particular comment amusing. Discrimination based on appearance is ok but if based on moral disagreement it is constitutionally prohibited?

225 posted on 08/08/2005 5:27:23 AM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Farah is a Kook.


226 posted on 08/08/2005 5:27:24 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Get over yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Sad. Tragic. Pathetic.

WND in a nutshell.

227 posted on 08/08/2005 5:32:00 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
If Roberts is not a conservative Justice, Pres. Bush is a failure.

He better be.

Bush better be??

228 posted on 08/08/2005 5:44:53 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Farah is a fair weather friend to Conservatives at best.

What are some other examples? Just curious. I actually like some of what he says, though being a teacher, I cringe whenever I hear something about education from him. He doesn't exactly follow that "if you don't have anything nice to say" rule then (in some cases he is justified though).


229 posted on 08/08/2005 5:48:22 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Some conservatives will call anyone a liberal who doesn't agree with them, even if it is on a minor point.

This guy one time wrote that he hated all the church vandalism going on in his area. I wrote back that I TOTALLY agreed with him and was thankful that it hadn't happened much in my area. He wrote back and accused me of being a liberal because I said that it didn't have much in my area. Oh brother....


230 posted on 08/08/2005 5:51:02 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Do a search on "Roberts" right here on FR. There's all kinds of positive info about him right here.

Here's a tip: Look for the posts with the fewest responses. For some reason, the articles with the positive information on Roberts have been all but ignored. Imagine that.


231 posted on 08/08/2005 5:51:35 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Same goes for James Dobson. Guess Dobson's a lib. Plus Roberts worked for Reagan. Reagan must have been a stealth liberal as well.

Yes, since we all ad-lib once in a while, we are all liberals.:)


232 posted on 08/08/2005 5:52:45 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

So Farah wants a date with Coulter,big deal.

Aren't they both married?:)


233 posted on 08/08/2005 5:53:20 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The White House said Roberts worked on the 1996 case for less than 10 hours and that he always agreed when someone at his law firm asked for help on a pro bono case in his area of expertise, appellate and Supreme Court arguments.

What he did in that case was routine for his firm. CSPAN played an '87 speech and Q&A session of Roberts speaking about the SC. He mentioned his firm using mock trials in which someone from the firm would play the role of an SC justice while the attorneys on the case would practice presenting their case.

He also said that SCOTUS is free to disregard or restrict precedent.

234 posted on 08/08/2005 5:55:35 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yeah, that five hours of pro bono work, playing Jusge Scalia in a Moot Court is hardly what I would call "leading the charge for homosexuality".

I suspect that the tactic by the left, played by the LA Slimes is to split conservatives on what the left considers to be a dangerous threat to their control of the courts.

As usual, conservative "purists" continue to be their own worst enemies as the eagerly chase the sock puppets held in front of them by the left.

235 posted on 08/08/2005 5:55:59 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (BOHICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

As far as I was concerned, the pivotal issues in 2000 and 04 were terrorism and the court (I've given up on immigration).

Time will tell if our election sucesses will have any meaning.


236 posted on 08/08/2005 5:56:37 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And, then, of course, there are those of you all who hate every single thing he does or says.

Exactly--wait a minute, aren't those who hate all that he does supposed to be liberals?

Actually, I don't support President Bush on some things, maybe even many things, but I do respect the man and his office. I'm not going to throw a temper tantrum every time about him, but I'll address things that I agree and disagree with and do the best I can. We have enough liberals and two-year-olds who throw tantrums anyhow. We don't need more of them.

237 posted on 08/08/2005 5:58:00 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

"The World's Only Reliable Newspaper." LOL!


238 posted on 08/08/2005 5:58:54 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Excuse me, but are "gay rights" as we see them "special rights," and not necessary?

Gays should have basic rights, but no "special" rights. They are NOT a minority group in my eyes. If that was the case, any of us could claim to be members of some minority group. We might as well have special rights for hazel-eyed, short, blond heterosexuals then.


239 posted on 08/08/2005 6:00:45 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
You think that someone that resigned from a law firm that represented gays in a legal matter would be a better appointment to the Supreme Court?

Looks like you responded to me for someone else's comments.

240 posted on 08/08/2005 6:04:40 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson