Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enola Gay-bashing: Fat Man, Little Boy, dumb poll
WorldNetDaily ^ | 8-8-05 | Doug Powers

Posted on 08/08/2005 5:08:48 PM PDT by RightWingReader

In 2005, when you say "Fat Man and Little Boy," you could be referring to Michael Moore and Robert Reich, but 60 years ago, devices sporting those seemingly innocuous monikers caused historically unmatched destruction, and ended a long war.

Poll questions surrounding the 60th anniversary of the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan contained a universal question: "Was it necessary?"

The polls that I've seen don't ask, "Was it the best option?" but rather focus on an absolute necessity for the bombings. Most things aren't absolutely "necessary."

There are always other options – options that may seem especially viable while being comfortably considered from afar, usually while participating in some poll decades after the incident in question.

Our opinion of what is "necessary" is often subject to our personal proximity to the danger, and since so many of us weren't even alive in 1945, it's easy to debate that question without the pressures of the moment. Harry Truman and company didn't have such a luxury.

Isn't it strange that you don't often see polls on whether or not it was "necessary" to attack Pearl Harbor in 1941?

The arguments have been presented ad nauseum ... there would have been millions of casualties on both sides in an allied invasion of mainland Japan. Not to sound rash (a qualifier that almost always precedes something so rash that it should only be read in close proximity to a tube of Desitin), but how is it that a quarter of a million-plus deaths in atomic bombings is more horrible than millions dying in the "regular" way? That seems to be the crux of the argument most often presented, and one that's never made sense.

Should the atom bomb have been first dropped as a demonstration of its power, such as on a remote island or isolated military base? If you're somebody who thinks a "demonstration" would have made Japan surrender, think about it for a minute.

Japan didn't even surrender after the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and instantly killed tens of thousands of their own citizens. Do you really think blowing up a rock pile somewhere in the Pacific would have made Japan's leadership throw their hands in the air and wave the white flag?

Rational people who figure their enemy is also rational could be making a lethal assumption.

As you would expect, many of the critics of Truman's decision are right here in the United States. After all, it can be easy for anti-war Americans to point the finger at the United States when it comes to civilian death in war. The United States has been lucky – with the exception of 9-11, civilian deaths on the mainland America due to enemy action have been minimal. The geographic location of the United States made it tough for enemies of America to stage strikes on its soil. This isn't due to lack of desire, but rather lack of ability.

Heavy criticism of America's bombing of civilians implies that their World War II enemies instead focused on military rather than civilian targets (don't tell that to the victims of the rape of Nanking or the other millions of Chinese civilians killed in the second Sino-Japanese War, or British victims of Germany's Blitzkrieg), but the United States doesn't return the favor. Enemies of America were so honorable that, for example, if Japanese leadership discovered that the USS Arizona were filled with Cub Scouts shortly after ordering "Tora Tora Tora," the attack would have been aborted. Sure.

Because of this, the U.S. critic may find it easy to look at the incendiary attacks on Dresden, carpet bombings on German and Japanese cities, and the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – millions of civilian casualties in all – and assume the United States was unfairly advantaged because Japan and Germany were unable to return the favor to Joe Sixpack in Boston, Los Angeles and Paducah. American success in World War II violated the tenet of leftist philosophy: fairness. They've read and seen "Failsafe" so much that the only acceptable final ending to the U.S.-Japan war would have been for Henry Fonda to order American planes to nuke New York.

In World War II, as far as nations go, the good guys won, and the bad guys lost. Period. Basing historical judgment of wars purely on its kindness, or lack thereof, to civilians, is like searching for anthill-friendly steamrollers.

As an addendum, here's a quick "fun fact": There are no more tiny islands in the South Pacific that are inhabited by Japanese soldiers who don't know the war's over, but there are still remote corners of academia where you can find leftist professors who still think their philosophies haven't been completely discredited.


Author's note: I've recently begun depleting the ozone layer of the blogosphere. Visit my new Web log for daily thoughts and responses to select reader e-mail.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hiroshima; nagasaki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: RightWingReader

The 2 A-bombs killed maybe 200,000 people. An invasion of Japan could have cost 1,000,000 Allied troops, mostly American, and as many as 10,000,000 Japanese.

I saw a revisionist leftist story in the paper today claiming the Soviet invasion of Manchuria is what ended the war, not the A-bombs. What a load.

21 posted on 08/08/2005 7:18:05 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r-q-tek86
Buttttt: We are better than them. Why stoop to their level. /sarcasm!
22 posted on 08/08/2005 9:15:24 PM PDT by rocksblues (I support the war on terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

"Tojo and his generals were willing to sacrifice all the civilians to avoid surrender."

I've seen photographs of grannies training with bamboo spears to repel the invasion.

23 posted on 08/08/2005 11:11:35 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

"I find it funny that the left is now bringing up the horror of WW2."

I think they're trying to create a political climate that would be inhospitable to the use of tactical nukes in Iran.

24 posted on 08/08/2005 11:12:44 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
This muddle-headed thinking continues to permeate society.

Part of the problem is revision history that has been taught out there over the past 30 years.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't necessary, neither was Vietnam nor the war in Iraq.

They don't understand war, and they don't understand how to win. They will continue to push this line of garbage until we are under tyrannical rule.

These people are insipid and need to go back to the classroom. (Or out to the woodshed!)

25 posted on 08/09/2005 3:42:16 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: commonasdirt
Exactly right!

The rape of Nanking took more lives then Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

Why do we never hear about that?

26 posted on 08/09/2005 3:43:41 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

Oh the Chinese have cetainly not forgotten. But the Japanese like to pretend it never happened

27 posted on 08/09/2005 4:04:31 AM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RightWingReader

ping for later

28 posted on 08/09/2005 5:49:07 AM PDT by Houmatt (Just when you think people cannot sink any lower..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingReader

Today is the 60th anniversary of the Japanese getting the message. We brought them a taste of what they foolishly believed they would do to us and never regret.

29 posted on 08/09/2005 6:03:36 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson