Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cindy Sheehan: "My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel."
Cindy's Usenet Posts ^ | Various | Cindy Sheehan

Posted on 08/10/2005 1:47:20 PM PDT by Sam Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-1,000 next last
To: Miss Marple
I believe it is Conyers and his minions running the show.

In one of the links she mentioned him and how he canceled some kind of protest or meeting over in the UK I believe and that that gave her the chance to go to Crawford to protest in front of the Presidents ranch.

Also Moveon.org is involved in this and some other organizations that are anti military and Anti-American.
821 posted on 08/11/2005 5:28:42 AM PDT by Mrs.Nooseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas
Congratulations you are using the same type of rhetoric as the slug below.


822 posted on 08/11/2005 5:39:13 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

That was more or less my understanding of the term and proud to be one. :o) Thanks for clarifying it a little more.


823 posted on 08/11/2005 5:48:35 AM PDT by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
"Its my theory on its code meaning among the left. Others have suggested it as well."

Thanks Phantom. I honestly didn't really know.

824 posted on 08/11/2005 6:04:14 AM PDT by subterfuge (Obama, mo mama...er Osama-La bamba, uh, bama...banana rama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

"Her husband has aleady left her over this, I think she has let the grief drive her completely mad."

I've never found anything that supports that statement. Only things I've found are that he supports her.


825 posted on 08/11/2005 6:04:42 AM PDT by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
BTW, do you still wear that silly skintight suit and carry the twin 45's?

What in the world are you talking about?

826 posted on 08/11/2005 6:23:30 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson
I'm not sure I buy that. These Islamists have shown no qualms about attacking other Muslim countries like Turkey, Jordan, Morocco, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, if these countries appeared to be getting too close to the West. But Iraq, and Saddam Hussein, they always left alone. If he really was their enemy, why would they refuse to try to overthrow him themselves, as they've tried with other leaders elsewhere?

You are attempting to interpret facts in such a way that they fit into your preconceived opinion. Saddam Hussein (as other BAATH leaders) WAS a secularist and Westernizer. Just learn a little more modern history of the Middle East.

Iraq was a regime which had socialist sympathies and which tended to be pro-Soviet. It had stronger hold on power as it mobilised more support among lower poorer classes. The countries who mentioned: "Turkey, Jordan, Morocco, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia" are the key pro-US countries - whenever they had problems with Islamists it was reported widely in US press.

When Assad or Saddam Huddein had problem at most it was buried in small print. Even when Algerian secularists who a pro-French and have huge problem with Islamic insurgents you hear very little about.

827 posted on 08/11/2005 6:49:21 AM PDT by A. Pole (Isaac Newton: "Plato is a friend, Aristotle is a friend, but truth is the greatest friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Saddam Hussein (as other BAATH leaders) WAS a secularist and Westernizer.

He was an admirer of Stalin and Hitler. Are you really suggesting he had Iraq on an enlightened path to liberty and peace?

828 posted on 08/11/2005 6:51:37 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Lots of people live in cities because THEY LIKE IT THERE. Nobody was ever "forced" to live in a city by "industrialist".

But if you need job in order to survive and job is in the city you are "forced", aren you? I guess you can say that you are free not to move and to starve.

829 posted on 08/11/2005 6:51:48 AM PDT by A. Pole (Isaac Newton: "Plato is a friend, Aristotle is a friend, but truth is the greatest friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

How in Sam Hill did you find all this stuff :-)


830 posted on 08/11/2005 6:58:30 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Believe me, it was NOT all beer and skittles and people, for the most part, were absolutely miserable! Their lives were lonely, hard, harsh, and uncomfortable. You wouldn't last a week!

Have you seen it? I did see the life in preindustrial village in Poland when I was a child.

No electricity, no shoes (shoes were used only for the church - you put them on after long walk just before entering so they last long).

They ate from one bowl (the gave me separate plate because I was a guest from the city). All family slept in one room sharing two beds. They gave me one special for the guest in second room - I felt like a prince :)

There lives WERE NOT "lonely, hard, harsh, and uncomfortable". I would last there for much longer than "a week" even if they did not give me separate plate or bed.

Also Polish villages were poorer that the American ones even in preindustrial time because American settlers had better agricultural traditions (from Western Europe) and much more land.

831 posted on 08/11/2005 7:01:48 AM PDT by A. Pole (Isaac Newton: "Plato is a friend, Aristotle is a friend, but truth is the greatest friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: elc
"Her husband has aleady left her over this, I think she has let the grief drive her completely mad."
I've never found anything that supports that statement. Only things I've found are that he supports her.

Here...

DS: Have you lost any friends or family over this? OR, how do your husband and neighbors feel about your sudden rise to prominence in the media and the role you've accepted in those venues?

CS: I have lost almost every friend that I had before Casey died. My husband and I are separated, because he doesn't support my activities, although he knows the war is a lie.

832 posted on 08/11/2005 7:09:53 AM PDT by Warren_Piece (Large buttocks are pleasing to me, nor am I able to lie concerning this matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
"Saddam Hussein (as other BAATH leaders) WAS a secularist and Westernizer."

He was an admirer of Stalin and Hitler.

Whether we was or not it does not change the facts that he was a secularist and Westernizer. And he was not alone among our "friends" in Middle East to have unhealthy sympaties.

Are you really suggesting he had Iraq on an enlightened path to liberty and peace?

Baath policy of secularism, emancipation of women, universal education focused on science, sooner or later would produce modern society with expanded freedoms.

Tell me how the present reforms in Iraq will do this job better?

833 posted on 08/11/2005 7:14:37 AM PDT by A. Pole (Isaac Newton: "Plato is a friend, Aristotle is a friend, but truth is the greatest friend")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: Alia

I'm all Cindy'd out. :)


834 posted on 08/11/2005 7:17:23 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast

If you are so "intellectual", why do you depend on lying, saying stupid things, and allying with socialists?


835 posted on 08/11/2005 7:19:42 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Just a question: has this lady actually spewed outright anti-semetism? Or does her opposition to, say, our support for Israel's foreign policy automatically qualify her as a Jew-hater?


836 posted on 08/11/2005 7:24:49 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece

Bookmarked.


837 posted on 08/11/2005 7:52:04 AM PDT by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Counterpunch.org material is not wanted on FR. Thanks.


838 posted on 08/11/2005 7:56:20 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Self-ping.
839 posted on 08/11/2005 8:07:11 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

She's probably getting paid.


840 posted on 08/11/2005 8:10:50 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-1,000 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson