To: Lazamataz
I see no motive for the government to hide terrorism.
I've seen not success with any coverup involving more than one person actually remaining secret.
34 posted on
08/11/2005 12:23:29 PM PDT by
HairOfTheDog
(Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: HairOfTheDog
I see no motive for the government to hide terrorism.Actually, you DID see the motive for said subterfuge.
After 9/11, there was a complete shutdown of all civilian aviation for a few days, and a multi-billion dollar impact on the economy for years thereafter.
Governments HATE multi-billion dollar impacts on the economy.
38 posted on
08/11/2005 12:26:53 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
To: HairOfTheDog
I've seen not success with any coverup involving more than one person actually remaining secret. Well duh, by definition, any successful cover-up would require that you NOT know about it unless you were one of the conspirators.
44 posted on
08/11/2005 12:33:12 PM PDT by
Sloth
(History's greatest monsters: Hitler, Stalin, Mao & Durbin)
To: HairOfTheDog
"I've seen not success "
Thus the reason for Clinton's Executive Order for the Military to remain silent about TWA 800? It is still in effect.
To: HairOfTheDog
I see no motive for this administration to hide terrorism. Clinton, on the other hand, had plenty of reasons, not the least of which was his so-called "legacy." He is still fond of saying "nothing" happened on his watch.
113 posted on
08/11/2005 1:30:10 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson