Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Lawyers: Mohamed Atta Off-Limits
newsmax.com ^ | Friday, Aug. 12, 2005 11:14 a.m. EDT

Posted on 08/12/2005 10:43:36 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch

Friday, Aug. 12, 2005 11:14 a.m. EDT Clinton Lawyers: Mohamed Atta Off-Limits

A year before the 9/11 attacks, Clinton administration lawyers told a group of military intelligence officers that information they had developed on 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta could not be shared with the FBI, saying of Atta himself: "You can't even touch him - it doesn't matter what information you have."

Rep. Curt Weldon, who helped develop the military intelligence group code-named "Able Danger," delivered the bombshell revelation in an interview Thursday with WABC Radio host Sean Hannity.

WELDON: In September of 2000 we tried on three occasions to take the information we had developed and pass it along to the FBI so they could follow up and take action against this [al-Qaida] cell and perhaps bring in Atta and question him and do whatever else was necessary. Three times we were turned down by lawyers in the administration.

HANNITY: We're talking about lawyers in the Clinton administration?

WELDON: Yes, it was the Clinton administration. Lawyers said there were two reasons why you can't do that. And they even put stickies over the face of Mohamed Atta on this chart they had. They said: "He's here legally. He's either got a green card or he's got a visa. So you can't even touch him - it doesn't matter what information you have." [END OF EXCERPT]

Moments later, Weldon said he was determined to find out who it was who ultimately gave the order to protect the lead 9/11 hijacker.

WELDON: The American people need to have answers. They need to have answers about who made the decision to stop our military intelligence from sharing information with the FBI, and how high up the ladder that went.

Did it stop at DoD? Or was the Justice Department involved in that decision? Or was the White House involved in that decision? [END OF EXCERPT]


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 911; abledanger; atta; clinton; doj; gorelickwall; hannity; talkradio; terror; transcript; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last
To: InvisibleChurch

Clinton could never sense a national security threat. That part of his brain is missing.

I guess the only way he has survived is via underhanded political retaliation and using the 'Vast Left Wing Coverup Machine'.


51 posted on 08/12/2005 12:02:03 PM PDT by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Okay Freepers: Is there any connection between the Gorelick "wall" edict and the Senator Thompson (R-Tenn) hearings regarding Chinese campaign donations? Was the "wall" also used to block the investigations into the Chi-Com military campaign donations to Clinton-Gore? Remember: Thompson was completely flummoxed and derailed after promising that there was a connection.
52 posted on 08/12/2005 12:02:17 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

OMG!

Many have said that Clinton should be tried for treason.

Is he immune from that?


53 posted on 08/12/2005 12:12:21 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

Meanwhile... back at the outhouse things are starting to pile up.


54 posted on 08/12/2005 12:21:26 PM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

If that's true, why hadn't some group "claimed responsibility" for it? Usually 2 or 3 groups come forward.


55 posted on 08/12/2005 12:31:26 PM PDT by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hardworking; Chevy Sales

Well, I found that July 18th 1996 Video on C-Span and ordered it just moments ago, 6 minute news conference with questions for $60.00. I'm a business owner so it doesn't matter what the cost. I'll post that online somewhere when I receive it in a few weeks, as I missed that one, and I'll bet a whole slew of people missed it too. I can't wait to see it and post it for all to see. He knew everything and all the time too!

Link Here for proof of video's existence(Where's that Tiny URL when I need it? LOL)

http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php?main_page=advanced_search_result&search_in_description=1&video_cat=SELECT%20A%20CATEGORY&video_policy=SELECT%20A%20POLICY&video_keyword=SELECT%20A%20KEYWORD&simple=twa%20flight%20800&sort=4d&page=3


56 posted on 08/12/2005 12:43:54 PM PDT by Pagey (Whether Hillary Clintons' attacks on America are a success or a failure depends upon YOU TOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Moments later, Weldon said he was determined to find out who it was who ultimately gave the order to protect the lead 9/11 hijacker.

Interesting................

I wonder where this will lead.............

Of course it will never be allowed to go anywhere..........


57 posted on 08/12/2005 12:47:49 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
Yes, and there is a distinct possibility that she will run for the Presidency of the US.
58 posted on 08/12/2005 12:54:08 PM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

So our intelligence gathering system was working after all.
911 can laid directly at the feet of the Clinton administration.
They have blood on their hands. B*stards.


59 posted on 08/12/2005 12:56:43 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (The Democrat party is the official party of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruin66
Al Qaeda would have most likely taken claim if they were responsible, however, threats were made prior to the downing of flight 800 that US airlines would be attacked. Also, it ain't over yet w/ concerns of dereliction of duty.

http://raylahr.entryhost.com/Air_Force.pdf Also, please review the history of the investigation, particularly in "Summary".

http://raylahr.entryhost.com/2005Update.htm

Also, please note this quote as to the sheer number of witnesses:

"We have access to 107 witnesses on 4 aircraft, 19 boats, and 31 locations ashore. They were located in a 360° circle around the missile engagement. Their live testimony alone will prove the aircraft was shot down. This is why the Justice Department has kept air crash investigators away from witnesses for 2 1/2 years and also one reason they are conducting a malicious show-trial prosecution of author and outside investigator James Sanders and his wife."

Because Cmdr. Donaldson was brought into the Sanders case as a defense consultant, he was first able to see detailed photographs, taken by Mr. Sanders of the Center Tank left side of body wall fracture pieces, in late March. These pictures were taken by Mr. Sanders at the request of Cmdr Donaldson during the discovery trial phase as allowed by a Federal judge. The pictures strongly suggest the left side of body wall of the center tank was blown into the tank at extremely high energy, not outward as the NTSB theory implies. When Cmdr. Donaldson called the NTSB and left voice-mail requesting to see the NTSB "Fracture Edge Analysis" of CWT left side of body wall parts, an NTSB attorney called back in minutes in a somewhat anxious state. The lawyer suggested such testing need not be done. Incredulous, Cmdr Donaldson informed him that any NTSB Final Report blaming a center wing tank failure without determining which way that wall exploded would be a farce."The photos, which were once on the net from the reassembled liner, which I saw, plus one set of radar images from tapes (I also saw), are now sealed by court order.

http://twa800.com/pages/missilesearch.htm

Regardless what anyone says, Fight 800 was shot down by a missile and the government covered / is covering it up. Which group or persons are responsible? I don't know. You can simply connect the dots. To this day a shoulder fired S2A is a threat to all aircraft upon approach or takeoff. With physically unsecured borders, it's just a matter of time before another "center fuel tank decides to blow itself up."

60 posted on 08/12/2005 1:07:34 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Pagey

Well, I found that July 18th 1996 Video on C-Span

Way to go! Is there some way you can alert me when you post to FR? I'll keep my eyes open for it. Thanks!


61 posted on 08/12/2005 1:25:08 PM PDT by hardworking (Save money on redecorating the White House - elect Hillary and maybe she'll bring the stuff back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
If you need a place to put that video for the world to see, I'll be honored to put it on my 0cents.com site.

I have unlimited bandwidth!

62 posted on 08/12/2005 1:30:22 PM PDT by Seeking the truth (0cents.com - Freep Stuff & Pajama Patrol Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Shaka
Yes, the truth will out, I'm sure. Hopefully, enough of it at least to nail the lid shut on the hopes of 'Hillarious Hillery.'

I nominate the moniker for another doublet for 'Old Maid'. Ranks right up there with 'Meano Reno' and 'Gorilla Gorelick.'

64 posted on 08/12/2005 2:18:42 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

The word "treason" isn't really adequate to describe the KKKlintons, Janet Reno, maddog Albright, Wesley Clarke, Jamie Gorelick et. al. We need to have a witchcraft trial, and burn all those lunatics at the stake.


65 posted on 08/12/2005 2:22:13 PM PDT by tamalejoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BayouCoyote

We, AMERICA, will pay for the next 100 years for Klintoon!!!--The pres elected by less than 1/2 of the less than 1/2 that voted....Dang that Perot guy I admit I voted for!


66 posted on 08/12/2005 2:34:32 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Shaka

She was on the committee.


67 posted on 08/12/2005 4:57:06 PM PDT by Lone Red Ranger (FD/TRODPINT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shaka

"This has Clinton inadequancies written all over it!"

Yep. No thought given to the dangers of not sharing information.


68 posted on 08/12/2005 5:05:08 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

"I can even understand them covering up now, but stonewalling the FBI while Clinton was in office?"

True, it looks as though the FBI didn't know who Atta was or where Atta was. That was the effect of not getting information from the Defense Department.


69 posted on 08/12/2005 5:11:14 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"You can't even touch him - it doesn't matter what information you have."

???? What kind of protection could Atta possibly have "earned?" He apparently had friends in very HIGH places & I don't mean Allah. Was he connected to OK City bombing? Some sort of American operative gone bad?

I don't get it.

70 posted on 08/12/2005 5:12:07 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Maybe someone can explain it to me. Even if he had a visa, green card or whatever, so what? Why oh why, if intelligence suggested a threat from a non-citizen did that make him untouchable?

Is there a true legal reason or was it simply not to upset the Muslim community?


71 posted on 08/12/2005 5:19:15 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales

If someone finds the video, ping me please!


72 posted on 08/12/2005 5:22:15 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pagey; Seeking the truth

http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/18/sights.and.sounds/index2.html

Scroll to the bottom. Is that the link?


73 posted on 08/12/2005 5:25:10 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

This information was apparently known a year prior to 9/11. Was this vital information not passed on to President Bush after his election in 2000? If not, why not? If it was, did Bush pursue it in the 10 months he was in office before 9/11?


74 posted on 08/12/2005 5:28:33 PM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Okay tin foil or not.... You have to ask the question..." why were they so specific that they couldnt touch this guy specifically." It does not make rational sense unless they knew of him personally. I mean why cover his face if he was a every day schmoe? I hear a very definite...uh oh.....in my head.

heavy duty foil....
Was this attack planned ( or known by clinton) before the election a year before in order to extend clintons time in office due to a marshall law order?


75 posted on 08/12/2005 5:31:01 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
More Klintoon (that includes the Hildabeest) incompetence

I disagree. It was corruption, on a criminal level, plain and simple. The incompetence was a side dish, not the main course.

76 posted on 08/12/2005 5:32:24 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales

Enormous implications. Hill must be tearing her hair out.


77 posted on 08/12/2005 5:33:31 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Mohamed Atta or his associates must have been blackmailing Clinton. Same with the Chinese. As long as they didn't do anything while he was president, he was going to leave them alone. Same with OBL; or he would have grabbed him when Sudan offered to turn OBL over to the USA.

Who said character doesn't count?


78 posted on 08/12/2005 5:34:36 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

WAS GORELICK IN THE ROOM AT THIS MEETING?!!!


79 posted on 08/12/2005 5:35:35 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Seems to be embargoed again on O'really. He ain't touchin' it.


80 posted on 08/12/2005 5:38:31 PM PDT by johnb838 (Able Danger. Able Danger. ABLE DANGER!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Well, I can't believe that the Bushies DIDN'T know about Able Danger all along. If they didn't, they were as blindsided as the media.

I think this scandal will go all the way up to the presidency -- the Clinton presidency.

Bush held back on it just like he was forgiving about everything else Clinton did -- like the whole trashing of the White House thing.

I think the Bushies, with all the dirt they had hanging over the Clintons, were really hoping that Clinton, as the titular head of the Democrat party, would keep his people reigned in a bit, and that the "new tone" would be given a chance.

I mean, Able Danger is all water under the bridge, isn't it? Bill Clinton and Papa Bush are playing golf together, right?

But finally, W's forebeanance was worn out with the latest Clinton attack on Judge Roberts, especially combined with all of the other continued liberal attacks on every other Bush move.

I think (hope) that these Able Danger revelations are (finally) a shot across the bow to the Clinton democrat party that they have reached the limit, and if they don't start playing by the rules, a lot more is to follow.


81 posted on 08/12/2005 5:38:45 PM PDT by EarlyBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

is this guy pushing a book? if it went down exactly like that, it seems Atta was being protected.


82 posted on 08/12/2005 5:40:27 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (see my FR page for a link to the tribute to Terri Schaivo, a short video presentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
He is the indirect cause of 9/11.

It's not so indirect. We were getting blasted and blasted and blasted. I don't think that the fact we haven't get hit maybe is because we're doing so great, but maybe our security is just a little more back to normal.

83 posted on 08/12/2005 5:41:12 PM PDT by johnb838 (Able Danger. Able Danger. ABLE DANGER!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Peach; All
I would bet if anyone ever gets to the bottom of this Hillary's hand prints will be all over this. This fits her MO to a tee. Total control,total scripting, of everything is what she was after. I don't think bubba gave a dam one way or the other. This wreaks of a hillary job.

Once again from what I have gleaned over the past few days the idea was for gorelicks wall to filter everything away from the military,(sounds like hitlery she hate the military), and let the decision on what action, if any, be made by hillary's lawyer buddies. Sounds like her all the way. this way they preempt the fbi,cia, the others, and the military. Just a guess but I bet it's close.
84 posted on 08/12/2005 6:18:38 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

The Clinton record

WTC. Oklahoma City. US Embassies in Africa. The USS Cole. 911

Go Slick Willy!


85 posted on 08/12/2005 6:30:01 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch; EagleUSA; Fedora; nuffsenuff; Southack; STARWISE; JaneAustin; Peach; ...
"Did it stop at DoD? Or was the Justice Department involved in that decision? Or was the White House involved in that decision?

We need to know all about what was going on in that time period in those departments. But we also need to know whether Gorelick's 'wall' is still overshadowing this entire matter. Here's something I think could prove to be really big, to go along with Gorelick's 'wall' memo from the Dept. of Justice -- does anyone have Pentagon or media contacts who could pursue this issue:

Not only did Gorelick write the infamous 'wall' memo setting policy in the Dept. of Justice, but BEFORE that she was the General Counsel for DOD in the immediate aftermath of Waco!! Recall that when the "Able Danger" matter broke the other day we were being told the policy against sharing such info from the military to the FBI was said to be instituted "BECAUSE OF WACO."

So, did Jamie Gorelick in 1993-94 (while the Pentagon's senior official for ALL such matters in the DOD) set any policies, write any memos, etc. that would still have been operative toward the end of the Clinton administration??? Consider, she may well have selected and TRAINED some of the very "Pentagon lawyers" who blocked "Able Danger" info from being transmitted to the FBI. Gorelick had worked BOTH sides of the Pentagon and Justice/FBI divide so vital to this matter -- indeed, she was very likely the ONLY senior offical (certainly the only LEGAL official) to have worked both sides of this particular divide during the Clinton years!!!. Granted, she had left government in 1997 BUT her policies, procedures, and dictates may well have been still operational in the Pentagon, AS THEY CLEARLY WERE IN JUSTICE AND THE FBI, from what Ashcroft testified to about "the wall"....

"Before joining the Department of Justice, Gorelick served from May 1993 to April 1994 as General Counsel of the Department of Defense."

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/1997/January97/018dag.htm

p.s. Here's something to make us all ill, Gorelick being feted by the left-liberal establishment:

http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9805/law.html
86 posted on 08/12/2005 6:39:58 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

In other words, is there another 'wall' memorandum (or related documents) buried in DOD files of the General Counsel's office, etc.????? Was any Gorelick policy barring such information-sharing in effect at the Pentagon throughout the Clinton years? It's a provocative question.

Such a document, if it exists and can be unearthed from the Pentagon's bureaucracy, would be truly damning.... especially if Rumsfeld could do an Ashcroft-type presentation of it at a press conference!!


87 posted on 08/12/2005 6:48:39 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

There is one thing that has always bothered me about 9/11 and Hill and Bill. The fact that her nemesis and our beloved former freeper Barbara Olsen was on board one of the highjacked jets. It's probably a terrible coincidence but it has always raised my eyebrow. On that morning Bill was in Australia and Hill never showed up to some meeting on Capitol Hill IIRC.


88 posted on 08/12/2005 6:59:29 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Mark Levin was all over this, on his show tonight.

No matter hows hard the MSM is trying to continue to hide this, it is not just simply going to go away.

89 posted on 08/12/2005 7:06:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Enchante; InvisibleChurch; EagleUSA; Fedora; nuffsenuff; Southack; STARWISE; JaneAustin; Peach; ...
"So, did Jamie Gorelick in 1993-94 (while the Pentagon's senior official for ALL such matters in the DOD) set any policies, write any memos, etc. that would still have been operative toward the end of the Clinton administration??? Consider, she may well have selected and TRAINED some of the very "Pentagon lawyers" who blocked "Able Danger" info from being transmitted to the FBI."

Note to self: she didn't necessarily have to institute such a policy while still at the Pentagon - at any time while she was Associate Attorney General she may well have sent a similar memorandum to the "Pentagon lawyers" telling them exactly how "the wall" applied to their work.... in fact, once she had written the policy on "the wall" wouldn't she have taken steps to ensure that ALL intel agencies across the government knew and were following her (imbecilic) interpretation of the 1978 FISA law??????? Maybe Rumsfeld could have an "Ashcroft moment" of presenting the same kind of document as the "wall memo"...... who can find a Pentagon official or reporter who would be able and willing to pursue this inquiry??
90 posted on 08/12/2005 7:35:05 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

Incredible how much the Clinton administration has damaged America. And to think his witch wants to run for president! Damn, they both should be in jail.
-----
I agree as many do, and it did not take this recent BIG FINALE of discovery of the Clinton travesties against this country....they both should have been in the slammer a long time ago.

It is going to be VERY TELLING as to how the media, and our government handles this DISCOVERY OF SUCH INCOMPETENCE AND POLITICAL CHICANERY AND GROSS NEGLIGENCE !!!! IT WILL TELL YOU ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT / MEDIA COMPLEX.


91 posted on 08/12/2005 7:41:00 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

And don't forget that the Clintons had already removed every state attorney upon their election, so in cases where a US atty. had to be used, they were already "cleared" partisans who would accede to her new dictates. Boy, they plotted and schemed all this from the get go, those traitors!


92 posted on 08/12/2005 7:52:14 PM PDT by STARWISE (CURB POLLUTION; SAVE ENERGY: Show a lie-detection meter for every Democrat interview.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Rep. Curt Weldon said today on Fox News that there are 15 unexamined boxes of documents(!), and now 11 witnesses(!!), (NOT just 1), who are willing to testify under oath.

He also is calling for 9/11 Staffers to be questioned under oath re: their evident negligence, &/or close-mindedness, &/or cover-up behavior, and/or stonewalling.


93 posted on 08/13/2005 10:43:40 AM PDT by FReethesheeples (Was the Narcissistic Joe Wilson a Source in "Outing" His Own Wife Valerie Plame as a "CIA Agent"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples

my, my


94 posted on 08/13/2005 11:13:08 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Mr. Chambers! Don't get on that ship! The rest of the book, "To Serve Man", it's... it's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch; Enchante; EagleUSA; Fedora; nuffsenuff; Southack; STARWISE; Shaka; ...

Under little-known, but established, US Supreme Court-sanctioned precedent, Jamie Gorelick, as a former Federal bureaucrat, can & should be sued civilly for gross dereliction of duty, for contributory negligence and culpability in 3,000 deaths (& counting), and for gross negligence as the DOJ "Wall of Separation" memo author, which greatly & unconscionably expanded the "letter of the law" to, in effect, protect spies and terrorists.

This in turn may lead to other higher up Clinton Administration officials being revealed as complicit or culpable under discovery, deposition and courtroom testimony.

Certainly the infamous Gorelick DOJ memo was consistent with the highly cautious and overly legalistic approach of the Clinton Administration (& The Clinton White House) toward National Security, espionage, and terrorism issues.


95 posted on 08/13/2005 11:55:57 AM PDT by FReethesheeples (Was the Narcissistic Joe Wilson a Source in "Outing" His Own Wife Valerie Plame as a "CIA Agent"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
Thank God. There finally go the *Crintons.

Hope he takes his time with this, drags it out for a while..

96 posted on 08/13/2005 2:18:29 PM PDT by txhurl (i stole the *crintons from another freeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: All

Local Grassroots Activism Toolkit
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1374533/posts

Email Contacts for Media, Government, USA, Europe, Consulates, Embassy and more for Activism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1388699/posts


97 posted on 08/13/2005 8:54:54 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Do you know if anyone has ever compiled a list of the 'new' state attorneys who took affice immediately following Jan. 20, 1993?

Thanks,
Pinz


98 posted on 08/13/2005 9:08:20 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Shaka
"I wanna know why the 9/11 commission did not interview GORELICK??? Why?"

Simple...Gorelick was making the decisions on who to interview and what to report.

SOP for bureacratic whitewash jobs.

99 posted on 08/13/2005 9:11:41 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
"Hold On now..........it doesn't matter who gave the order to let Atta skate.....the buck stops at 1600 Pennsylvania my friends, does it NOT??"

Sure...as long as a REPUBLICAN is the current resident.

If it's one of the MSM's own, it becomes a non-story that the masses never even hear about, let alone are whipped into a frenzy over a la Richard Nixon.

100 posted on 08/13/2005 9:16:49 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson