Posted on 08/13/2005 1:35:10 AM PDT by nickcarraway
THE woman's long black hair whipped across her pale face as she danced to punk rock at the bar. She seemed to be the life of the party. Little did she know that she was igniting a girl crush. Susan Buice was watching, and she was smitten.
Ms. Buice, 26, and the dancer (actually a clothing designer) happen to live in the same Brooklyn apartment building, so Ms. Buice, a filmmaker, was later able to soak up many other aspects of her neighbor's gritty yet feminine style: her layered gold necklaces; her fitted jackets; her dark, oversize sunglasses; and her Christian Dior perfume.
"I'm immediately nervous around her," Ms Buice said. "I stammer around her, and it's definitely because I think she's supercool."
Ms. Buice, who lives with her boyfriend, calls her attraction a girl crush, a phrase that many women in their 20's and 30's use in conversation, post on blogs and read in magazines. It refers to that fervent infatuation that one heterosexual woman develops for another woman who may seem impossibly sophisticated, gifted, beautiful or accomplished. And while a girl crush is, by its informal definition, not sexual in nature, the feelings that it triggers - excitement, nervousness, a sense of novelty - are very much like those that accompany a new romance.
This is not a new phenomenon. Women, especially young women, have always had such feelings of adoration for each other. Social scientists suspect such emotions are part of women's nature, feelings that evolution may have favored because they helped women bond with one another and work cooperatively. What's new is the current generation's willingness to express their ardor frankly.
"Historically, talking about these kinds of feelings has gone in and out of fashion,"
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Another episode from the New York Times' continuing series of "Lifestyles of the Shallow and Stupid NY Liberal Female"...
Sometimes I think we're due for another great flood.
Good time to be a boat salesman...
Yeah, well, let the same man be their mutual object of attention and all that will fly out the window.
This is some of the most insipid drivel I've ever seen. BARF!
And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.-- Genesis 8:21, KJV
What a steaming pile.
LOL! Well said!
Someone at work told me there's stuff like that on the internet, but I don't believe him.
What? A NY Times reporter suggesting that women might be genetically different in their emotions from men?
Well, there is a biblical precedent of great love and friendship between two women, in the story of Ruth.
Ruth pledged to Naomi: "Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay. Your people will be my people and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there I will be buried. May the Lord deal with me, be it ever so severely, if anything but death separates you and me"
BWAHAHAHA!
Thanks!
I thought it had merit.
Men must be very careful these days when looking for a wife. If your girlfriend is obsessed with such nonsense as other women in dark, oversized sunglasses, run far, far, away.
The end result is not worth it.
That's so old fashioned, today they would share and share alike.
"What's new is the current generation's willingness to express their ardor frankly."
Oh, fi on that. Eleanor Franklin and women of her age, my mother included, wrote gushy, mushy letters and said adoring things about their women friends to each other.
The Victorian women were the absolute masters of gushy feminine admiration.
Mother was not Victorian, but she certainly was Edwardian with all the mush included.

Stephanie Rosenbloom.
Related:

I can sympathize with Stephanie Rosenbloom, I can. In case you dont read The New York Times, she has complained that the only image of her on the Internet was nine years old, bohemian, brunette and unflattering, and it followed her around like a Ghost of Fashion Unconsciousness Past. She mentioned that she was now a blonde who wore stiletto heels. Presumably, her current incarnation is much more attractive. However, she hasnt yet posted a new picture of herself online, so we have to take her word for it. Yyyeah. Might want to fix that, Steph.
I laugh every time I look at it. There's just something so human about that picture.
LOL
Humor is rooted in reality.
So, you're saying that Ruth and Naomi may have been the first "girl crush" situation? Good grief, Charlie Brown.
":^(
Sheesh. You can't make this stuff up.
Why? As a female, I find it to be very true. And very sad.
"Another episode from the New York Times' continuing series of "Lifestyles of the Shallow and Stupid..."
Tell me about it! This sort of emotion is appropriate to the 9 to 15yr age group. These "adults" are seriously emotionally retarded.
Ok, fire then!
Well, you can tell who actually read the article and understood it vice the folks who had a knee-jerk reaction at the headline or lead.
"Social scientists suspect such emotions are part of women's nature, feelings that evolution may have favored because they helped women bond with one another and work cooperatively."
Evolution of emotion? Really? I wonder what the genetic structure of that looks like? Nice "just-so story" about the evolutionary advantages. The evolution of cooperation.
Also, Maybe because there are at least 10 righteous people still left. Genesis 18:32
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Yep, that sounds very adult.
Insipid, self-absored, Lesbo-American twit bump for later.
What? A NY Times reporter suggesting that women might be genetically different in their emotions from men?
In the crapola of leftwing liturgy, "bonding" and "cooperation" are considered high virtues. Therefore it is permissible and even desirable to explain why they distinguish womyn from those eeeevil men.
Good analysis, IMO. But we don't dare suggest that men and women's intelligence might vary in any way!
Well, no. But I just wanted to point out a touching Bible story about a wonderful friendship among two women.
That you should even consider debasing the beautiful story of Ruth and Naomi with this tripe of a story from the NYT, makes me question your brain functions. Ruth was such a good example of devotion to her elderly mother-in-law that, though she had been a heathen Moabitess, she later married Boaz, thus becoming an ancestor of the Savior. Watch your mouth.
Not necessarily. I'm neither stupid nor liberal, and I had a few nonsexual "crushes" like that in my late teens and early twenties. A good friend's younger sister seems to have had one on me when she was in her early twenties. I just don't think they're important enough to warrant newspaper coverage. But it's an interesting phenomenon IMO - on reflection, I'd say that it's a last ditch "eek, I'm almost a grownup!" check for role models.
Now what it says that New York women are still looking for role models in their thirties is another matter altogether.
Evolution of emotion?
Yes.
Really?
Yes, really.
I wonder what the genetic structure of that looks like?
The same as the genetic structure of other traits: sequences of nucleotides. For example:
Items 1 - 8 of 8
Entrez pubmed Results
1: Davidson RJ, Jackson DC, Kalin NH. Related Articles, Cited in PMC, Books, LinkOut Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience.
Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):890-909. Review.
PMID: 11107881 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2: Flint J. Related Articles, Cited in PMC, Books, LinkOut Analysis of quantitative trait loci that influence animal behavior.
J Neurobiol. 2003 Jan;54(1):46-77. Review.
PMID: 12486698 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: Goodson JL. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut The vertebrate social behavior network: evolutionary themes and variations.
Horm Behav. 2005 Jun;48(1):11-22. Review.
PMID: 15885690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Harris-Warrick RM. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Ion channels and receptors: molecular targets for behavioral evolution.
J Comp Physiol [A]. 2000 Jul-Aug;186(7-8):605-16. Review.
PMID: 11016778 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: Katz PS, Harris-Warrick RM. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut The evolution of neuronal circuits underlying species-specific behavior.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Oct;9(5):628-33. Review.
PMID: 10508740 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6: Parmigiani S, Palanza P, Rogers J, Ferrari PF. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Selection, evolution of behavior and animal models in behavioral neuroscience.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):957-69. Review.
PMID: 10580310 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7: Paul DH. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Pedigrees of neurobehavioral circuits: tracing the evolution of novel behaviors by comparing motor patterns, muscles, and neurons in members of related taxa.
Brain Behav Evol. 1991;38(4-5):226-39. Review.
PMID: 1777805 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8: Takahashi JS, Pinto LH, Vitaterna MH. Related Articles, Cited in PMC, Books, LinkOut Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse.
Science. 1994 Jun 17;264(5166):1724-33. Review.
PMID: 8209253 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
A brief tidal wave for NYC, and an earthquake for So.Cal.?
I think God promised no more "great floods".
Gee a "gay" newspaper taking innocent hero worship and turning it into a homosexual wet fantasy.
NYT? so I was right, it IS from a "gay" newspaper.
I was not debasing the story. It is one of my favorites. You'll note I refer to it as a touching story of a wonderful friendship.
But hey, you sound like a fun FReeper. Tell me, what was it like during time of the Puritans? Were you one of the people who locked people into the stocks for being insufficiently pious?
Read the 2003 article here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.