Posted on 08/14/2005 1:43:26 AM PDT by dangifiknow
There is a document on the website of the Superior Court of California County of Solano which describes Case ID: FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY, filed Friday, August 12th, 2005. The case is described as "D - Dissolution without kids".
This appears to describe a divorce between Cindy Sheehan and Pat Sheehan.
Pat is the Petitioner and his attorney is Glen Andrew Deronde. Cindy Sheehan is the respondent with no attorney listed. The judge in the case is Alberta Chew.
(Excerpt) Read more at dangifiknow.com ...
I don't blame him! I wouldnt want to be married to a freakshow either!
You signed up today to post this?
I could not get the link to open.
Not dangifiknow.com, but anything after this.
Can you post it?
What is this about?
I know I would divorce that bitch if she defecated on my Son's Grave :-)
There's plenty to talk about in this kook's rambling, hateful, weird statements. We all attacked the NYT for looking into Roberts' personal life, let's just not go there with Sheehan and make her even more of a martyr.
Thanks for the help. I cannot get it to open right now.
I will check back.
bttt
SHEEHAN |

` 



Why would they use a word like "kids" (rather than "children") in an official filing?
Does not sound quite legit to me.
It's been talked about behind the scenes that this was coming down the pike. I wonder how she'll react when the papers are served. Somehow I don't think she'll care. The most important thing in the world to Cindy is Cindy. Not her marriage, not her kids, but Cindy, Cindy, Cindy.
If he and the other three sons are really behind her like she claims then I wonder why he would file the papers now. It he is "supportive" then it is extremely poor timing to have divorce proceedings coincide with the week she is in the media spotlight.
Being she keeps saying her husband is on her side I think this is very interesting....
http://courtconnect.solanocourts.com/pls/bprod_cc/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?case_id=FFL087021
Case ID: FFL087021
Docket Start Date:
Docket Ending Date:
Case Description
Case ID: FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY
Filing Date: Friday , August 12th, 2005
Type: D - Dissolution without kids
Status: none
Related Cases
No related cases were found.
Case Event Schedule
No case events were found.
Case Parties
Seq # Assoc Expn Date Type ID Name
1 JUDGE CHEW CHEW, ALBERTA
Address: unavailable Aliases: none
2 3 PETITIONER @620859 SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Address: unavailable Aliases: none
3 2 PETITIONER'S ATTORNEY @00035425 DERONDE, GLEN ANDREW
Address: 460 Union Avenue
Fairfield CA 94533 Aliases: none
4 RESPONDENT @620860 SHEEHAN, CINDY
Address: unavailable Aliases: none
Docket Entries
Filing Date Description Name Monetary
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS ISSUED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS FILED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PAYMENT SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: A Payment of -$289.50 was made on receipt FLFF72889.
Docket Entries
Filing Date Description Name Monetary
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS ISSUED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS FILED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PAYMENT SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: A Payment of -$289.50 was made on receipt FLFF72889.
Man, the lies just keep on coming, don't they?
It appears that this is legit. Can't say I blame him.
From interviews Cindy has given, she's basically destroyed her family in favor of her own 'needs.' She's on the road at least three weeks out of four. Her husband had enough and left. Her youngest daughter (19) has drowned her grief in drinking and partying. Her eldest daughter and surviving son see, to be doing okay from what she says. But she can't be there for any of them because she has to 'save the world' from George w. Bush.
Oh wow ... I just noticed the date on this petition
It sure doesn't sound like he's standing behind her as she claims
And if papers are served to her down in Crawford will we see pictures?
There's damn sure enough cameras down there to get the shot.
This thread should be pulled. What relevance does this have as to why she's in Crawford now?
| Case ID: | FFL087021 | |
| Docket Start Date: | ||
| Docket Ending Date: |
| Case ID: | FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY | |
| Filing Date: | Friday , August 12th, 2005 | |
| Type: | D - Dissolution without kids | |
| Status: | none |
So much for the "he supports" me diatribe, eh?
What was her "job" that she claims she lost because of Bush?
Just another pesky little fact she's lying about.
I would not be surprised to see that this is true, but I am cautious because of that phrasing.
Remember, feelings are running high and we must not be tempted into believing something fraudulent injected into the discussion. The left likes to make us look bad, and I don't want us to fall into a trap.
I went to the site and it looks legit; it's not a fake link.
Weird wording those, but, hey, it's California.
That's beginning to wear a little thin on me, too.
What site did you go to...the Superior Court?
Thank you. How did you find that? I went to the web site for the Superior Court, Solano County, but I couldn't find a place to look up the information.
It's Bush's fault.
Did you see her blog yesterday saying she was "doused" by rain?
I'm thinking she may have God in her sights.
I followed the second link in this post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1463027/posts?page=9#9
If you go to that site and click to their home page, all you have to do is Search his last name and it comes right up.
I don't think it's fake, even allowing for the "kids" being a word we don't think is a legal term.
Well, unless dangifiknow can explain how to duplicate that information on the court's web site, I will remain suspicious. Since dangifiknow is a brand-new poster, I would like an explanation of how he/she found the document.
Well, if you want my opinion, this poster saw this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1463167/posts
and has now posted it on his web site, claiming it as its own, trying to get hits -- and not realizing how FR works.
But that's just me. :-)
Here's another one:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1463220/posts
All posted EARLIER than this one.

Catholic youth camp where Sheehan worked as a counselor and organized youth retreats.
When Cindy Sheehan worked as a youth minister, Casey helped found the church's youth group and remained active even after graduating from high school.
*****
I don't think she has had a job for a long time other than trying to impeach the President.
******
June 16, 2005
Cindy Sheehan
"'We're watching you very carefully and we're going to do everything in our power to have you impeached for misleading the American people,' she said, quoting a letter she sent to the White House. 'Beating a political stake in your black heart will be the fulfillment of my life...,' she said, as the audience of 200 people cheered." - Cindy Sheehan, President of Gold Star Families for Peace, an organization whose membership includes relatives of more than 50 soldiers who died in Iraq.
To say the least, an unusual way of putting it, jarringly so in a legal document.
Additionally, the name Cindy is usually a nickname for the more typical given name Cynthia. Unless the name Cindy, not Cynthia, is on her marriage certificate, this also looks odd.
Gawd almighty, where did that last quote come from?
Cindy Sheehan is a waste of skin.
(Divorce is "allowed", but only when staying together may offend God's love... at least as I understand the rule.)
....and space, and oxygen, and sympathy....
Maybe we have FReeper with knowledge of Californian family law who could verify the customary phrasing in a divorce petition.
Total relevance.
This fruitcake is blaming all her troubles on Bush, the death of her son and the war.
Obviously her neuroses, the real cause of her problems, started a long time before either happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.