Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Case ID: FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY [Caveat lector: “dissolution without kids”]
dangifiknow.com ^

Posted on 08/14/2005 1:43:26 AM PDT by dangifiknow

There is a document on the website of the Superior Court of California County of Solano which describes Case ID: FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY, filed Friday, August 12th, 2005. The case is described as "D - Dissolution without kids".

This appears to describe a divorce between Cindy Sheehan and Pat Sheehan.

Pat is the Petitioner and his attorney is Glen Andrew Deronde. Cindy Sheehan is the respondent with no attorney listed. The judge in the case is Alberta Chew.

(Excerpt) Read more at dangifiknow.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bummer; cindysheehan; divorce; dude; dudette; kids; patricksheehan; sheehan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-104 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2005 1:43:26 AM PDT by dangifiknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

I don't blame him! I wouldnt want to be married to a freakshow either!


2 posted on 08/14/2005 1:45:02 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

You signed up today to post this?


3 posted on 08/14/2005 1:48:43 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow; kristinn
So what else is news?

Sheehan told a reporter for an Austin, Texas, newspaper that she and her husband, Patrick, have separated but said, "We both are handling our grief differently,' according to the newspaper.
"He agrees with the philosophy behind what I'm doing, that the war was wrong and George Bush lied, but he doesn't understand that I have a passion that I have to do this and this is the only way. If I can shorten the war by one minute and save one life, that would just give me so much comfort in my grief.'
Patrick Sheehan has declined to comment publicly about his wife's efforts. His family, however, issued a terse e-mailed comment on Thursday.

4 posted on 08/14/2005 1:50:21 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

I could not get the link to open.

Not dangifiknow.com, but anything after this.

Can you post it?


5 posted on 08/14/2005 1:51:40 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Howlin

What is this about?


6 posted on 08/14/2005 1:55:12 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Not sure, A newbie with a link that appears to be legit.

I know I would divorce that bitch if she defecated on my Son's Grave :-)

7 posted on 08/14/2005 1:57:07 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow
We hate it when they do this stuff to us, why do we want to get into this?

There's plenty to talk about in this kook's rambling, hateful, weird statements. We all attacked the NYT for looking into Roberts' personal life, let's just not go there with Sheehan and make her even more of a martyr.

8 posted on 08/14/2005 2:01:24 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 ("The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they'll be when you kill them."-Wm. Clayton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
In your response to you request to post the backup information, the article at dangifiknow.com has the link to the case in the court document system. The original article is at
9 posted on 08/14/2005 2:07:01 AM PDT by dangifiknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

Thanks for the help. I cannot get it to open right now.

I will check back.


10 posted on 08/14/2005 2:09:18 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Bring back the HUAC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

bttt


11 posted on 08/14/2005 2:40:25 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon


CINDYSHEEHAN

and

PRESIDENT   GW   BUSH


839x566
`
420x283

315x214

210x142

*140x94

 Cindy leans in for a kiss on the cheek from Pres. Bush  

Cindy's husband Patrick has left her and filed for divorce.

839x566 - 28,137 bytes - online image enhancement sites
original photos were pulled from Cindy Sheehan's website
this photo is from a Google cached *thumbnail image

 Cindy Sheehan & her "hero" - convicted defense attorney for the WTC 1993 bombing - Al Qaeda terrorists Lynne Stewart appear together at radical rally: 


"This country is not worth dying for!"         
         CODE PINKO -- Cindy Sheehan:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17915


12 posted on 08/14/2005 3:00:42 AM PDT by devolve (------- http://tinypic.com/a47v9u.gif --American Immigration ---- Good-Bad-or-Ugly?-- -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

Why would they use a word like "kids" (rather than "children") in an official filing?

Does not sound quite legit to me.


13 posted on 08/14/2005 4:55:41 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangifiknow

It's been talked about behind the scenes that this was coming down the pike. I wonder how she'll react when the papers are served. Somehow I don't think she'll care. The most important thing in the world to Cindy is Cindy. Not her marriage, not her kids, but Cindy, Cindy, Cindy.


14 posted on 08/14/2005 7:03:58 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

If he and the other three sons are really behind her like she claims then I wonder why he would file the papers now. It he is "supportive" then it is extremely poor timing to have divorce proceedings coincide with the week she is in the media spotlight.


15 posted on 08/14/2005 9:01:42 AM PDT by libsl (I'm just sayin'....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

Being she keeps saying her husband is on her side I think this is very interesting....


16 posted on 08/14/2005 9:15:38 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; Mo1

http://courtconnect.solanocourts.com/pls/bprod_cc/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?case_id=FFL087021


Case ID: FFL087021
Docket Start Date:
Docket Ending Date:


Case Description

Case ID: FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY
Filing Date: Friday , August 12th, 2005
Type: D - Dissolution without kids
Status: none


Related Cases

No related cases were found.

Case Event Schedule

No case events were found.

Case Parties

Seq # Assoc Expn Date Type ID Name
1 JUDGE CHEW CHEW, ALBERTA
Address: unavailable Aliases: none

2 3 PETITIONER @620859 SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Address: unavailable Aliases: none

3 2 PETITIONER'S ATTORNEY @00035425 DERONDE, GLEN ANDREW
Address: 460 Union Avenue
Fairfield CA 94533 Aliases: none

4 RESPONDENT @620860 SHEEHAN, CINDY
Address: unavailable Aliases: none



Docket Entries

Filing Date Description Name Monetary
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS ISSUED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS FILED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PAYMENT SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: A Payment of -$289.50 was made on receipt FLFF72889.


17 posted on 08/14/2005 9:18:12 AM PDT by hipaatwo (Thinking of a good tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro


Docket Entries

Filing Date Description Name Monetary
12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS ISSUED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM SUMMONS FILED SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: none.

12-AUG-2005
02:35 PM PAYMENT SHEEHAN, PATRICK
Entry: A Payment of -$289.50 was made on receipt FLFF72889.


18 posted on 08/14/2005 9:20:18 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Man, the lies just keep on coming, don't they?


19 posted on 08/14/2005 9:21:32 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

It appears that this is legit. Can't say I blame him.


20 posted on 08/14/2005 9:22:13 AM PDT by Bahbah (Air America: kids-for-kilowatts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: libsl

From interviews Cindy has given, she's basically destroyed her family in favor of her own 'needs.' She's on the road at least three weeks out of four. Her husband had enough and left. Her youngest daughter (19) has drowned her grief in drinking and partying. Her eldest daughter and surviving son see, to be doing okay from what she says. But she can't be there for any of them because she has to 'save the world' from George w. Bush.


21 posted on 08/14/2005 9:25:01 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; hipaatwo; Howlin
I wonder how she'll react when the papers are served. Somehow I don't think she'll care

Oh wow ... I just noticed the date on this petition

It sure doesn't sound like he's standing behind her as she claims

22 posted on 08/14/2005 9:49:26 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; kristinn; hipaatwo; Howlin

And if papers are served to her down in Crawford will we see pictures?

There's damn sure enough cameras down there to get the shot.


23 posted on 08/14/2005 10:17:53 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This thread should be pulled. What relevance does this have as to why she's in Crawford now?


24 posted on 08/14/2005 10:22:35 AM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Report Selection Criteria

  Case ID:  FFL087021
  Docket Start Date:  
  Docket Ending Date:  


Case Description

  Case ID:  FFL087021 - SHEEHAN, PATRICK VS. CINDY
  Filing Date:  Friday , August 12th, 2005
  Type:  D - Dissolution without kids
  Status:  none


Related Cases

No related cases were found.


Case Event Schedule

No case events were found.

25 posted on 08/14/2005 11:10:16 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; kcvl; Sam Hill; Miss Marple; deport

So much for the "he supports" me diatribe, eh?


26 posted on 08/14/2005 11:11:20 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marajade
"This thread should be pulled. What relevance does this have as to why she's in Crawford now?"

Are you serious? No this thread should not be pulled. It is a post related to a current news event.

It is very relevant to "why she's in Crawford now" because the press is attempting to portray Cindy Sheehan as some type of "grieving anguished mother" who's family supports what she is doing.

If this information is verified as correct, it seems her husband does not support her as she continues her hysterical and self-centered publicity stunt down there in Crawford.
27 posted on 08/14/2005 11:13:12 AM PDT by MisterRepublican ("Therefore, a demand for an accounting of the vast discrepancies must also be public.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; kcvl; Peach; Mo1; Sam Hill

What was her "job" that she claims she lost because of Bush?


28 posted on 08/14/2005 11:14:57 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Just another pesky little fact she's lying about.


29 posted on 08/14/2005 11:18:14 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What is that "Dissolution without kids" statement? Is that how California lists this? Shouldn't it be "dissolution without minor children" or something like that?

I would not be surprised to see that this is true, but I am cautious because of that phrasing.

Remember, feelings are running high and we must not be tempted into believing something fraudulent injected into the discussion. The left likes to make us look bad, and I don't want us to fall into a trap.

30 posted on 08/14/2005 11:20:38 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

I went to the site and it looks legit; it's not a fake link.

Weird wording those, but, hey, it's California.


31 posted on 08/14/2005 11:22:26 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
as some type of "grieving anguished mother"

That's beginning to wear a little thin on me, too.

32 posted on 08/14/2005 11:23:49 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What site did you go to...the Superior Court?


33 posted on 08/14/2005 11:23:58 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

http://courtconnect.solanocourts.com/pls/bprod_cc/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?case_id=FFL087021


34 posted on 08/14/2005 11:34:31 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thank you. How did you find that? I went to the web site for the Superior Court, Solano County, but I couldn't find a place to look up the information.


35 posted on 08/14/2005 11:38:48 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
So much for the "he supports" me diatribe, eh?

It's Bush's fault.

36 posted on 08/14/2005 11:42:32 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Did you see her blog yesterday saying she was "doused" by rain?

I'm thinking she may have God in her sights.


37 posted on 08/14/2005 11:43:28 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

I followed the second link in this post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1463027/posts?page=9#9

If you go to that site and click to their home page, all you have to do is Search his last name and it comes right up.

I don't think it's fake, even allowing for the "kids" being a word we don't think is a legal term.


38 posted on 08/14/2005 11:45:09 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; dangifiknow

Well, unless dangifiknow can explain how to duplicate that information on the court's web site, I will remain suspicious. Since dangifiknow is a brand-new poster, I would like an explanation of how he/she found the document.


39 posted on 08/14/2005 11:47:49 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Well, if you want my opinion, this poster saw this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1463167/posts

and has now posted it on his web site, claiming it as its own, trying to get hits -- and not realizing how FR works.

But that's just me. :-)


40 posted on 08/14/2005 11:49:36 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Here's another one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1463220/posts

All posted EARLIER than this one.


41 posted on 08/14/2005 11:50:18 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Catholic youth camp where Sheehan worked as a counselor and organized youth retreats.

When Cindy Sheehan worked as a youth minister, Casey helped found the church's youth group and remained active even after graduating from high school.

*****

I don't think she has had a job for a long time other than trying to impeach the President.

******

June 16, 2005
Cindy Sheehan

"'We're watching you very carefully and we're going to do everything in our power to have you impeached for misleading the American people,' she said, quoting a letter she sent to the White House. 'Beating a political stake in your black heart will be the fulfillment of my life...,' she said, as the audience of 200 people cheered." - Cindy Sheehan, President of Gold Star Families for Peace, an organization whose membership includes relatives of more than 50 soldiers who died in Iraq.

42 posted on 08/14/2005 11:53:46 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart; gpapa; aculeus; general_re; Dog Gone; Catspaw; BlueLancer
Type: D - Dissolution without kids

To say the least, an unusual way of putting it, jarringly so in a legal document.

Dissolution without children.

43 posted on 08/14/2005 11:58:03 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Additionally, the name Cindy is usually a nickname for the more typical given name Cynthia. Unless the name Cindy, not Cynthia, is on her marriage certificate, this also looks odd.


44 posted on 08/14/2005 11:58:05 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; Victoria Delsoul

Gawd almighty, where did that last quote come from?


45 posted on 08/14/2005 11:58:22 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Cindy Sheehan is a waste of skin.


46 posted on 08/14/2005 11:59:11 AM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
She claims she's a great Catholic. If they're really divorcing, then this will go on her "record".

(Divorce is "allowed", but only when staying together may offend God's love... at least as I understand the rule.)

47 posted on 08/14/2005 11:59:24 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Cindy Sheehan is a waste of skin.

....and space, and oxygen, and sympathy....

48 posted on 08/14/2005 12:00:38 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Liberals preach comity and practice calumny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Maybe we have FReeper with knowledge of Californian family law who could verify the customary phrasing in a divorce petition.


49 posted on 08/14/2005 12:00:43 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marajade
What relevance does this have as to why she's in Crawford now?

Total relevance.
This fruitcake is blaming all her troubles on Bush, the death of her son and the war.

Obviously her neuroses, the real cause of her problems, started a long time before either happened.

50 posted on 08/14/2005 12:05:49 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson