Skip to comments.

Posted on 08/16/2005 11:47:32 AM PDT by Mia T

CARRYING-hillary's-ANTI-PIRRO-WATER club

by Mia T, 8.16.05

Let's keep a running list on this thread of the carrying-hillary's- anti-Pirro-water club. Let's prove what Andrea Mitchell's performance last Sunday merely hinted at, namely, that there's not a dime's worth of difference between a purveyor of access journalism and a useful idiot.

 

Hillary in Aviary by Mia T, November 2000, sometime before "the first Tuesday after the first Monday" "Bird of paradise" would have been a brilliant wrong answer for the New-York-state-bird question; in one fell swoop it would have flattered the necessary constituency, rendered hillary's cheating marginally believable and suggested a quick, secure, creative mind. But the obsessively perfectionistic dodo wasn't able to fake even one wrong answer in the Letterman phony "pop quiz," a nostalgic electuary of "Twenty-One" fraud and (Groucho) Marxist left-wing crow. Instead, this documented incompetent with no apparent creative or analytic (not to mention thespian) skills gushed forth with a lame--"It's the bluebird--I know that" --globally exposing herself to be the corrupt clown that the sentient among us already know she is. It is no accident--and the Sheehy hagiography notwithstanding, it is certainly not because of any patriarchal society--that this reflexive kleptocrat never sought office. She never ran simply because she is a perfectionist and an incompetent who cannot tolerate personal (as opposed to bill-related) criticism, witness the prescreened, heavily controlled, sycophantic crowds, her pre-programmed, totally scripted appearances (or, alternatively, her totally mute "listening tour"), her unavailability to the press, indeed, her "bluebird." Thus, the question begging to be asked is this: Why would this compulsively perfectionistic grotesquerie allow herself to be unambiguously exposed as the utter incompetent and fraud and fool and horror that she is? And why would this self-proclaimed protector of "the children" prolong her own child's profound trauma by forcing her own bottom-heavy self, soiled in its own right, onto the political stage? The answer, I believe, resides more in liberty loss than in power gain. Simply put, she is not running for office; she is running from indictment. And I fear Starr successor, Robert Ray, is unable to catch her... Or catch on. (On second thought, maybe the problem is that he does....) Ray's recent statement , " I have been charged with responsibly conducting the work of this office. Some of my responsibility is to ensure that there is no untoward effect on the political process," both confirms and encourages this latest round of clinton raping, pillaging, despoiling, destroying. Will this nightmare never end? COPYRIGHT MIA T 2000, 2005

ANDREA MITCHELL CARRIES OBLIGATORY ANTI-JEANINE WATER FOR HILLARY CLINTON   by Mia T, 8.15.05   JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman   (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) MS. MITCHELL: But let's also talk about another political battle which is Hillary Clinton's new opponent in New York. Let's take a look at what could be one of the most lively races, Jeanine Pirro, the county D.A. in Westchester County, who launched her campaign, and take a look at her launch. Here she is trying to describe and explain why she is running again Hillary Clinton. She had a page missing. Not exactly a great kickoff. E.J., is this a real threat to Mrs. Clinton? MR. DIONNE: I think that Ms. Pirro's challenge is not to have her entire campaign defined by the sentence, "Do you have page 10?" It was really a remarkable moment. Look, she's a lady... MS. MITCHELL: And her husband was nowhere in sight, of course. He is a convicted felon. Is this also going to be race where you've got two very accomplished women trying to keep their husbands off of the podium? MR. DIONNE: Given the comparison, I think Mrs. Clinton may bring out her husband as often as possible. You know, she is taking a chance. Mrs. Clinton is way ahead in the polls. She's been a very good politician in New York state and Ms. Pirro is hoping to get at least some attention out of this. She's got to run at least better than Congressman Lazio did against Mrs. Clinton last time, which wasn't that good. This was not an auspicious start for her campaign. MS. MITCHELL: But, Byron, does Hillary Clinton have to come up with an answer in '06 when she's running for reelection as to whether or not she is then going to turn around and run for president in '08? MR. YORK: I don't think so. I don't think she's facing an unforgiving public in New York, and I think if she runs for reelection and wins, which she most likely will, she'll be able to turn around and run for president and not alienate any of her supporters, although her husband did say recently that, you know, you lookyou have to look to the next election or you may not get past the next election. MEET THE PRESS Transcript for August 14 ndrea Mitchell, who confessed recently she eats no bread, apparently has no problem swallowing her pride. Illustrating that the difference between useful idiot and purveyor of access journalism is academic, Ms. Mitchell raced through missus clinton's risible talking points du jour yesterday, under the theory, so it seems, that increased velocity decreases, if not absurdity, notice. THE TALKING POINTS Jeanine Pirro's missing page 10 is an indelible stain, a veritable automatic disqualifier: This, coming from the candidate whose reams of "missing" inculpatory billing records magically reappeared in the White House living quarters the instant the statute of limitations had run. Andrea's embarrassment was palpable. ASIDE: Jeanine is very bright, articulate, media savvy and charismatic. She's a natural. Precisely why the clinton machine zeroed in on this insignificant performance ruffle. They desperately want to redefine Jeanine as a dud, "you know," along the lines of their candidate. Jeanine Pirro is married to the Mob. Worse, the wise guy was nailed: The absurdity here is self-evident. One thing the clinton machine does have right: Al is no bill.

SCHEMA PINOCCHIO how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor by Mia T, 8.03.05 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) MAD hillary series #5 WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN FOR AMERICA FOR THE WORLD They turned our bridge to the 21st century into a tunnel back into the 19th century. Back us out of that Republican tunnel, fill it in, go back across the bridge.... We'll have a giant celebration when we come back to Columbus in 2020. There's nothing more wonderful than making dreams come true. hear hillary clinton address to the Democratic Leadership Council Columbus, Ohio 7.31.05 issus clinton is a dud. I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates. It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her. Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip. The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer. Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe. It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow. Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'." The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures. AFTERWORD: Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops. And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio. In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years. To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.

This issue really isn't about Jeanine Pirro.
It's about hillary clinton.

The 2006 election is a dry run for missus clinton.
Are we going to allow her to run a furtive campaign once again?
Are we going to allow the clinton agitprop machine paint some idealized picture of this dangerous, corrupt grotesquerie?

Or will we force her to stand upon her own so that the voter will be able to see her for what she really is?



That said, regarding your RINO complaint:

Pirro will support: Bush's national security and war-on-terror agendas Bush's judicial nominations, which is where the real leverage is on the abortion issue--NB pro-lifers! Bush's fiscal policies So there is every difference in the world between Pirro and clinton. And this doesn't begin to consider hillary clinton's corruption, betrayal and ineptitude. Or the rapes and other predation. Let us not forget that it was hillary clinton who hired Jamie Gorelick. Gorelick proceeded to do hillary clinton's bidding, which undermined the national security and was the efficient cause of 9/11. Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK   The contrast between these two women could not be more stark. BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women   JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman   (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere   HILLARY DUD -- NOT DUFF -- PORTENDS JEANINE WIN   "Married to the Mob" and other stop-Jeanine sillygisms       "While the Republicans are (place some nasty verb here), a clinton is working hard for the people"

 

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.