Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ocean bug has 'smallest genome'
BBC ^ | 8/19/05 | Roland Pease

Posted on 08/19/2005 9:44:18 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Small but perfectly formed, Pelagibacter ubique is a lean machine stripped down to the bare essentials for life.

Humans have around 30,000 genes that determine everything from our eye colour to our sex but Pelagibacter has just 1,354, US biologists report in the journal Science.

What is more, Pelagibacter has none of the genetic clutter that most genomes have accumulated over time.

There are no duplicate gene copies, no viral genes, and no junk DNA.

'Chicken soup'

The spareness of its genome is related to its frugal lifestyle. The shorter the length of DNA that needs to be copied each generation, the less work there is to do.

Pelagibacter has even gone one step further. It has chosen where possible to use genetic letters - or base pairs - which use less nitrogen in their construction: nitrogen is a difficult nutrient for living things to obtain.

The result is one of the most successful organisms on the planet. Pelagibacter feeds off dead organic matter that is dissolved in ocean water - lead researcher Stephen Giovannoni of Oregon State University likens it to a very thin chicken soup.

The dissolved carbon is always there, so there is no need to build in special metabolic circuits to adjust between periods of feast and famine. Indeed, in laboratory studies, the Oregon biologists have found that adding nutrients to the broth has no effect on the microbe's vigour.

Self-sufficient

The sheer abundance of Pelagibacter - there are an estimated 20 billion billion billion Pelagibacter microbes scattered throughout the world's oceans - is probably what has allowed the organism to streamline its genes.

With so many copies in the ocean, there are plenty of opportunities for random mutations to try out more thrifty combinations.

There are organisms with smaller genomes - Mycoplasma genitalium has about 400 genes. But these are all obligate parasites or symbionts, relying on other organisms to do the jobs they have abandoned. Pelagibacter is entirely self-sufficient.

There is a great deal of interest in finding out how few genes a living organism can get away with. Bio-entrepreneur Craig Venter is trying to create an artificial version of a bacterium, aiming for as few as 300 genes.

Stephen Giovannoni says the synthetic one will barely function. But Pelagibacter on the other hand, accounting for a quarter of all organisms in the ocean, is a shining example of Darwin's principle, the survival of the fittest.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bug; crevolist; dna; genes; genetic; genome; microbe; nitrogen; ocean; pelagibacter; smallest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2005 9:44:20 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Ha!Ha!

My genome is bigger than yours!

2 posted on 08/19/2005 9:49:19 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Pelagibacter feeds off dead organic matter that is dissolved in ocean water - lead researcher Stephen Giovannoni of Oregon State University likens it to a very thin chicken soup.

"Waiter, there's something dead in my soup. May I have some more?"

3 posted on 08/19/2005 9:49:34 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I've been trying to lose a little weight and have blamed it on my genes. I think I have too many genes to fit into my jeans. I hope this research pays off and I can shed a few genes.


4 posted on 08/19/2005 9:51:54 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

5 posted on 08/19/2005 10:05:13 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
But Pelagibacter on the other hand, accounting for a quarter of all organisms in the ocean, is a shining example of Darwin's principle, the survival of the fittest.

Well, I was enjoying the article until the last sentence. Darwin must be sitting at the Right Hand of God as reward for all that hard work of explaining the design.
6 posted on 08/19/2005 10:07:21 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It ain't easy bein' gene.......


7 posted on 08/19/2005 10:11:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? GOOOOGLE your own name. Want to have fun? GOOOOGLE your neighbor's......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

" Well, I was enjoying the article until the last sentence. "

It's a shame that biologists don't bow to religious orthodoxy apparently.


8 posted on 08/19/2005 10:13:08 AM PDT by Moral Hazard ("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
ocean water - likens it to a very thin chicken soup

OTOH, now we know we'll never starve because there are five enormous bowls of free chicken soup on the planet! ;-)

9 posted on 08/19/2005 10:15:19 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There are no duplicate gene copies, no viral genes, and no junk DNA.

No duplicates = no redundancy, that is, no back up system.
I know many humans like this.

10 posted on 08/19/2005 10:18:01 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing
A pro-evolution science list with over 300 names.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

11 posted on 08/19/2005 10:24:37 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's the genome map if anyone wants to browse. Click anywhere to zoom in; the colored boxes are genes; several contiguous boxes of the same color denote a single RNA transcript; the arrows are the direction of transcription; click on the box to find out what we think the gene codes for.
12 posted on 08/19/2005 10:34:56 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor (Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - John Marburger, science advisor to George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

If you're overweight, PLEASE don't take off your genes in public!


13 posted on 08/19/2005 10:35:07 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rokurota

"My genome is bigger than yours!"

It's not the size of the genome but how you transcribe it.


14 posted on 08/19/2005 10:36:12 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Correction; the colors code for the metabolic pathway the gene is involved in.


15 posted on 08/19/2005 10:36:54 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor (Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - John Marburger, science advisor to George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


16 posted on 08/19/2005 10:39:28 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Thanks, RWP! Very interesting information!
17 posted on 08/19/2005 10:39:42 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Here's the genome map if anyone wants to browse.

It's a code. A code from the Intelligent Designer!! It says: "Twin towers, 9/11 ... Bush did it for the oil."

18 posted on 08/19/2005 10:44:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Very interesting, thanks!


19 posted on 08/19/2005 10:45:22 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ndt

"It's not the size of the genome but how you transcribe it."

You should try reverse transcription. WOW!


20 posted on 08/19/2005 10:49:17 AM PDT by Sinner6 (http://www.digital-misfits.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson