Posted on 08/21/2005 1:04:32 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
Debbie Schluessel is a babe, no doubt.
Senators do not vote to impeach; the Constitution assigns that power and duty to the House of Representatives. The Senate votes only to convict or aquit those impeached by the House.
In the case of Clinton's impeachment, the whole matter is irrelevant since those valiant Republican Senators caved to the Dems and refused to allow even a legitimate presentation of the evidence by the House managers, much less an actual trial.
A Google search of "Ashcroft" and "Gorelick" produced this article by Mark Levin. http://www.nationalreview.com/levin/levin200404151634.asp
During his testimony before the 9/11 Commission, John Ashcroft referred to another significant document:
"... [T]he Commission should study carefully the National Security Council plan to disrupt the al Qaeda network in the U.S. that our government failed to implement fully seventeen months before September 11."
Details are at the link.
Many think that is why Sandy Berger was stuffing documents down his pants
Why wasn't Jamie Gorelick ever called to testify before the 9/11 Commission???
I think Gorelick, if charged, will roll over on Bill and, more importantly, the beast!
And she was also involved somehow in the (okay---pressing recall button repeatedly here . . .) savings and loan scandal? BNC? Something like that. Sorry, should have looked it up before posting, but there you have it.
Also, please notice the key word: “gorelickwall”.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/gorelickwall/index
This will explain why the FBI was so “incompetent” in piecing evidence together. FRegards ....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.