Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq draft says laws must conform to Islam -text
Netscape News ^

Posted on 08/22/2005 11:13:09 AM PDT by Charlesj

Iraq draft says laws must conform to Islam -text

BAGHDAD, Aug 22 (Reuters) - A draft constitution for Iraq to be presented to parliament on Monday will make Islam "a main source" for legislation and ban laws that contradict religious teachings, members of the parliamentary drafting panel said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.netscape.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-305 next last
We'd be better off with Sadam if this is the ultimate result.
1 posted on 08/22/2005 11:13:10 AM PDT by Charlesj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Charlesj
We'd be better off with Sadam if this is the ultimate result.

Is there some strategy here? I can't help but thinking this is very bad... maybe the polls are reflecting this? People supported the war that was supposed to bring freedom.. not the war that was going to install an Islamic dictatorship..

2 posted on 08/22/2005 11:16:20 AM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

What was the point of liberating Iraq if we're just helping to install another Islamic theocracy?


3 posted on 08/22/2005 11:18:43 AM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

So what the heck does this mean?

Sharia law by default?

Before you democrats chuckle, I wouldn't vote you in office on a bet.


4 posted on 08/22/2005 11:19:45 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

I have come to the conclusion that Muslims are incapable of living in a democracy.


5 posted on 08/22/2005 11:19:52 AM PDT by RockinRight (Democrats - Trying to make an a$$ out of America since 1933)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

You left out the part where there are two sources that new laws must be checked out against... Islamic Law and Democratic principles/human rights.

Also, the Islamic principles the vague language they used leaves a lot of room for interpretation.


6 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:19 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I've come to the conclusion that all of them have lead poisoning in some degree or another.


7 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:32 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Draft Iraq constitution calls country "federal"
8 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:33 AM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Inshallah, Allahu Akbar.

America as the midwife of a Sharia state.

Goodness.


9 posted on 08/22/2005 11:21:24 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Did people think the Iraqi legislators would dawn powdered wigs and draft on constitution based on Christian ideology like our founding Fathers did?


10 posted on 08/22/2005 11:24:37 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Really.....Some of the people in here are real pieces of work. Your not going to have a secular society with a deeply religious people. As for the Sadam comment, PU


11 posted on 08/22/2005 11:26:54 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Did people think the Iraqi legislators would dawn powdered wigs and draft on constitution based on Christian ideology like our founding Fathers did?

Seriously. Why is anyone surprised? Iraqi democracy is not going to be like American democracy. The vast, vast majority of Iraqis are Muslim. Is it surprising that they want their new constitution to reflect their values?

12 posted on 08/22/2005 11:27:02 AM PDT by Modernman ("A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy." -Disraeli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

They said Islam is "A" main source, not "THE" main source;
that leaves room for a lot of interpretation.

(At least, that's what I'm hoping. . .)


13 posted on 08/22/2005 11:27:17 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj
BAGHDAD, Aug 22 (Reuters) - A draft constitution for Iraq to be presented to parliament on Monday will make Islam "a main source" for legislation and ban laws that contradict religious teachings, members of the parliamentary drafting panel said.

So that's what 1800 soldiers died for. F&$# 'em. Let's get out of that country and kick the Islamofascists out of ours.

14 posted on 08/22/2005 11:30:30 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

>>ban laws that contradict religious teachings,

So much for ladies bare limbs, or barbers who shave beards, video stores showcasing hollywood/bollywood, or liquor stores.

The days of having a beer and fried fish on the banks of the Tigris, with a woman companion dressed in a western outfit in the most secular, technocratic society of the Muddled East are over.

Too bad we've abandoned the secularists and modernists.


15 posted on 08/22/2005 11:32:53 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Well its no longer a question bring the boys home...No sense being there if their not protecting freedom, because they are officially not now.

the war is officially a failure.


16 posted on 08/22/2005 11:33:18 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
From the best Iraqi blog. http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/ Regarding Islam and the constitution: it was agreed upon that no laws that are against the widely agreed upon values of Islam can be issued and no laws that are against the values of democracy and human rights can be issued.

I am hopeful too. It seems like an important compromise was reached. The important word above is "widely." Also, it gives human rights and values of democracy equal footing. Remember, women make up 60% of Iraq. I doubt they would want to have Sharia law imposed. I think Reuters wants to put the worse spin on it. I believe Iraq will turn out much better than the leftist MSM will ever admit.

17 posted on 08/22/2005 11:35:05 AM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Iran Junior. Wonderful.


18 posted on 08/22/2005 11:35:42 AM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Well, then, just fookem! We should have just given them a great big glass parking lot. I have no more compassion left, for anyone's kids, but mine.
They claim to be an ancient civilization, but, they ain't progressed a decade beyond their starting point, could be that it is the best they can do. Don't show me any more pictures of pitiful,little,abused, and neglected babies,my emotions are focused on my own.


19 posted on 08/22/2005 11:36:12 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP, ALEX KOZINSKI FOR SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

All this and what do we get? The beginnings of a theocracy. Don't worry, I'm sure Bush will try to spin this over the next week. Isn't the plan over the next 5 days to presents even better excuses for the police action?


20 posted on 08/22/2005 11:37:09 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I think it's more the rampant consanguinity combined with the toxic religious culture.


21 posted on 08/22/2005 11:37:17 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

More MSM misrepresentation.


22 posted on 08/22/2005 11:37:23 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj
Constitution says laws must conform to Islam

Please do not change headlines.

23 posted on 08/22/2005 11:38:03 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon; All

True, also a bunch of num nuts who fail to see thru the MSM misrepresentation..


24 posted on 08/22/2005 11:38:47 AM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

The article doesn't say anything we didn't know long ago. They'd already planned on saying no law can be against Islam, but they would also lay out a basic set of human rights that no law (even those supported by Muslim fundies) could violate. We'll see how it panned out.


25 posted on 08/22/2005 11:39:34 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
One said the text, agreed by the ruling Shi'ite and Kurdish coalition over Sunni Arab objections, would read: "Islam is a main source for legislation and it is not permitted to legislate anything that conflicts with the fixed principles of its rules."

And of course you'll explain how this is misrepresention? Islam will be the basis for all laws in Iraq.

26 posted on 08/22/2005 11:44:08 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Depends on what they mean by 'conform to Islam.' Seems to be more than one school of thought on that.


27 posted on 08/22/2005 11:44:51 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
I'm in the group that feels like getting our guys shot up for these people was not really the right thing to do. I've been saying for more than a year now that this is Babylon.... and that there was no way there would be a western style democracy/republic there. Those people are not capable of self rule. It has always, and will always be that way.

Hence the WH statements about how establishing freedom was the way to defeat terrorism has never made sense to me. We should get our guys out of the way... and then bomb those people until they surrender.... plain and simple.

28 posted on 08/22/2005 11:45:01 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

It does. Unfortunately, many Islam-haters here have painted the picture of Islam as a monolithic religion. It is not. Sunni and Shi'ite muslims adhere to significantly different doctrinal positions in many areas.

Sharia law is an aspect of Wahabbi Islam, the most extreme and militant sect out there.

Relax. The kook elements of Islam come mostly from the Haddith. Sunnis and Shi'ites both have different levels of loyalties to different Haddith writings, and even different interpretations of various passages of the Koran.

The Kurds also have a power stake in the new government and are even more relaxed in their versions of Islam.

This is not the catastrophe the main stream press is painting.


29 posted on 08/22/2005 11:45:07 AM PDT by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

So, at the cost of billions of dollars, we just made West Iran.


30 posted on 08/22/2005 11:45:11 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: podkane

Doesn't freedom mean they can pick the kind of country government they ant?


31 posted on 08/22/2005 11:45:39 AM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty2004
I am hopeful too. It seems like an important compromise was reached. The important word above is "widely." Also, it gives human rights and values of democracy equal footing. Remember, women make up 60% of Iraq. I doubt they would want to have Sharia law imposed. I think Reuters wants to put the worse spin on it. I believe Iraq will turn out much better than the leftist MSM will ever admit.






It is certainly FAR too early to be engaging in hysterical predictions of doom.
32 posted on 08/22/2005 11:46:12 AM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Depends on what they mean by 'conform to Islam.' Seems to be more than one school of thought on that.

Problem is that the bombings aren't going to stop until "conform to Islam" means exactly what we don't want it to mean.

33 posted on 08/22/2005 11:46:24 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
The days of having a beer and fried fish on the banks of the Tigris, with a woman companion dressed in a western outfit in the most secular, technocratic society of the Muddled East are over.

And when did this occur? During the days of Saddam's rape rooms? The days of the industrial shredder?

34 posted on 08/22/2005 11:47:03 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

Because western pornagraphy, alcoholism and sluttish dress are the true indicators of freedom?

You confuse freedom and license.

You also think Wahabbism is all of Islam.


35 posted on 08/22/2005 11:47:25 AM PDT by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Everybody calm down. This is Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld we're talking about, not the RATS. Everything will work out fine. They've gotten us this far with overwhelming success. Don't go wobbly now that the end is nearly in sight.


36 posted on 08/22/2005 11:47:56 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
This is Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld we're talking about, not the RATS. Everything will work out fine. They've gotten us this far with overwhelming success.

LOL

37 posted on 08/22/2005 11:49:02 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

Hey, so long as the women have no more rights than an end table, all is good?


38 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:03 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I have come to the conclusion that Muslims are incapable of living in a democracy.

If by that you mean the traditional and typical muslim today, that is absolutely correct.

The two are mutually exclusive, by any interpretation.

39 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:08 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billbears

The MSM meme is the Iraqis are setting up an Islamic state therefore President Bush has failed. If you think the Iraqis are setting up an Islamic state in the mold of Iran, you don't have a clue.


40 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:08 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Yes, the Mullahs will be dancing in the streets if this passes.
41 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:18 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj
Islam is defined as a "a" main source, not "the" main source of state legislation. That leaves enough wriggle room to keep some secular personal status laws, such as those pertaining to women, on the statute books. Its not enough for extremists like Musab al Zarqawi, who view a secular constitution as godless and hold the Koran is the only law Muslims should live under.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
42 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
bill - the operative word in this sentence is legislate. In other words, the de facto position is neutrality (you advantageously left out that no law cannot be passed which violates human rights - see Iraq the Model). They can't pass a law making Christianity the state religion. They probably can't pass a law establishing state casinos.

If the "human rights" clause holds, they also can't pass laws that do not allow women to drive, vote, etc .

Somebody's gonna get hurt, with your knee jerking like that...

Let's see what gets released in the next hour or so before declaring all is lost.

43 posted on 08/22/2005 11:51:26 AM PDT by Warren_Piece (Large buttocks are pleasing to me, nor am I able to lie concerning this matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

"I've come to the conclusion that all of them have lead poisoning of some sort"


Or they need it, if you get my drift.


44 posted on 08/22/2005 11:51:41 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

My remark was not meant as sarcasm. Who else could have done as good a job. Certainly not Clinton.


45 posted on 08/22/2005 11:52:20 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Seriously. Why is anyone surprised? """

I'm not. That's one reason why I opposed this invasion -- and sending American troops to die in Iraq -- from the beginning. The country was a 4th rate military power, didn't have WMDs, wasn't being 9-11, and couldn't be "changed" into a democracy. A lot of blood spilled in behalf of utopian fantasies by policy gurus who almost uniformly don't have any kids or kin in the military.

46 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:27 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

its too early to tell what this means. if we start seeing women losing rights, and mullahs and clerics holding government positions of power - then we will know its gone badly.


47 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:33 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Who else could have done as good of a job?? It just depends on what you call an acceptable outcome. I think there are several freepers here who I would have let make the decisions.


48 posted on 08/22/2005 11:54:37 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Hey I defended the war and defended Bush for ever....The Iraqy people have chosen what they want and it ain't us.We did what we could for them...Its time to come home.


49 posted on 08/22/2005 11:55:34 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

You guys are a bunch of dopes.

What did you expect? ... Did you think the Iraqi constitution was going to be based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. It's an Islamic country. They are a very religious society, and they are not going to start hang pictures of George Washington and the ten commandment on their court houses.


50 posted on 08/22/2005 11:55:53 AM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson