Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We'd be better off with Sadam if this is the ultimate result.
1 posted on 08/22/2005 11:13:10 AM PDT by Charlesj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Charlesj
We'd be better off with Sadam if this is the ultimate result.

Is there some strategy here? I can't help but thinking this is very bad... maybe the polls are reflecting this? People supported the war that was supposed to bring freedom.. not the war that was going to install an Islamic dictatorship..

2 posted on 08/22/2005 11:16:20 AM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

What was the point of liberating Iraq if we're just helping to install another Islamic theocracy?


3 posted on 08/22/2005 11:18:43 AM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

So what the heck does this mean?

Sharia law by default?

Before you democrats chuckle, I wouldn't vote you in office on a bet.


4 posted on 08/22/2005 11:19:45 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

You left out the part where there are two sources that new laws must be checked out against... Islamic Law and Democratic principles/human rights.

Also, the Islamic principles the vague language they used leaves a lot of room for interpretation.


6 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:19 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Draft Iraq constitution calls country "federal"
8 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:33 AM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Inshallah, Allahu Akbar.

America as the midwife of a Sharia state.

Goodness.


9 posted on 08/22/2005 11:21:24 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Did people think the Iraqi legislators would dawn powdered wigs and draft on constitution based on Christian ideology like our founding Fathers did?


10 posted on 08/22/2005 11:24:37 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj
BAGHDAD, Aug 22 (Reuters) - A draft constitution for Iraq to be presented to parliament on Monday will make Islam "a main source" for legislation and ban laws that contradict religious teachings, members of the parliamentary drafting panel said.

So that's what 1800 soldiers died for. F&$# 'em. Let's get out of that country and kick the Islamofascists out of ours.

14 posted on 08/22/2005 11:30:30 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

>>ban laws that contradict religious teachings,

So much for ladies bare limbs, or barbers who shave beards, video stores showcasing hollywood/bollywood, or liquor stores.

The days of having a beer and fried fish on the banks of the Tigris, with a woman companion dressed in a western outfit in the most secular, technocratic society of the Muddled East are over.

Too bad we've abandoned the secularists and modernists.


15 posted on 08/22/2005 11:32:53 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Well its no longer a question bring the boys home...No sense being there if their not protecting freedom, because they are officially not now.

the war is officially a failure.


16 posted on 08/22/2005 11:33:18 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Well, then, just fookem! We should have just given them a great big glass parking lot. I have no more compassion left, for anyone's kids, but mine.
They claim to be an ancient civilization, but, they ain't progressed a decade beyond their starting point, could be that it is the best they can do. Don't show me any more pictures of pitiful,little,abused, and neglected babies,my emotions are focused on my own.


19 posted on 08/22/2005 11:36:12 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP, ALEX KOZINSKI FOR SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

All this and what do we get? The beginnings of a theocracy. Don't worry, I'm sure Bush will try to spin this over the next week. Isn't the plan over the next 5 days to presents even better excuses for the police action?


20 posted on 08/22/2005 11:37:09 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

More MSM misrepresentation.


22 posted on 08/22/2005 11:37:23 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj
Constitution says laws must conform to Islam

Please do not change headlines.

23 posted on 08/22/2005 11:38:03 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

The article doesn't say anything we didn't know long ago. They'd already planned on saying no law can be against Islam, but they would also lay out a basic set of human rights that no law (even those supported by Muslim fundies) could violate. We'll see how it panned out.


25 posted on 08/22/2005 11:39:34 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Depends on what they mean by 'conform to Islam.' Seems to be more than one school of thought on that.


27 posted on 08/22/2005 11:44:51 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

So, at the cost of billions of dollars, we just made West Iran.


30 posted on 08/22/2005 11:45:11 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Everybody calm down. This is Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld we're talking about, not the RATS. Everything will work out fine. They've gotten us this far with overwhelming success. Don't go wobbly now that the end is nearly in sight.


36 posted on 08/22/2005 11:47:56 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj

Hey, so long as the women have no more rights than an end table, all is good?


38 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:03 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charlesj
Islam is defined as a "a" main source, not "the" main source of state legislation. That leaves enough wriggle room to keep some secular personal status laws, such as those pertaining to women, on the statute books. Its not enough for extremists like Musab al Zarqawi, who view a secular constitution as godless and hold the Koran is the only law Muslims should live under.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
42 posted on 08/22/2005 11:50:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson