Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What National Geographic Actually Said About The Chart and Atta
National Geographic

Posted on 08/23/2005 4:49:02 AM PDT by Stajack

Here's EXACTLY what National Geographic said about The Chart, Atta, Special Operations and the FBI, as Transcribed from the special "Inside 9/11". Originally aired 8/21/05, re-aired 8/22/05.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abledanger; atta; inside911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
“AT THIS AIR FORCE BASE IN TAMPA (Picture of Entrance Gate to MacDill Air Force Base), MEMBERS OF THE U.S. ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ARE REVIEWING AN UNUSUAL CHART THAT REPORTEDLY IDENTIFIES BOTH ATTA (picture ID of Atta shown) AND AL-SHEHHI (picture ID of Al-Shehhi shown) AS LIKELY MEMBERS OF AN AL-QAEDA TERROR CELL OPERATING WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARY”. The next segment discussed terrorist training camps in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
1 posted on 08/23/2005 4:49:04 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stajack

And here it is for those who DON'T like to be shouted at, first thing in the morning:

"At this air force base in Tampa (picture of entrance gate to Macdill Air Force Base), members of the U.S. Army special operations command are reviewing an unusual chart that reportedly identifies both Atta (picture id of Atta shown) and Al-Shehhi (picture id of Al-Shehhi shown) as likely members of an Al-Qaeda terror cell operating within the united states. the officials decide they cannot pass this information along to the FBI, in part because the men are holding valid U.S. visas and may be off limits from intelligence gathering by the military”."

Dan


2 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:07 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Got link?


3 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:32 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Hi Lloyd. A little slow tonight, isn't it?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

I understand today, the Pentagon says they have not uncovered proof of Abel Dangers claims.

Maybe they should watch t.v. and see un-classified reports.

The classified reports must be a whopper.


4 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:58 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I watched the National Georgraphic special Sunday and Monday nights. The poster has transcribed this section of the show correctly and, to my knowledge, it would be darned near impossible for him to post a link to a television show.

As we were on the live thread and watching this show, lots of freepers understood what was being discussed and typed, simultaneously, "Able Danger".


5 posted on 08/23/2005 4:55:55 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stajack
THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARY

Setting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense.

6 posted on 08/23/2005 4:56:52 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Shout all you want. This is an excellent post!!!! The dems must be reaching for their Depends at this point.


7 posted on 08/23/2005 4:58:53 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Is the report typed with proportional spacing? Does it look like it was done in Word?


8 posted on 08/23/2005 4:59:05 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Yeah, we've been hearing that same thing for 2 weeks. And...?


9 posted on 08/23/2005 5:02:16 AM PDT by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Stajack; All


.


What 'INSIDE 9/11' didn't report:

The CLINTON White House's refusing 3 Free Offers from the Sudan during the 1990's to give us OSAMA bin LADEN on a Silver Platter before he could hit us hard here at home =

9/11 Lifesaving Hero RICK RESCORLA, r.i.p.

http://www.RickRescorla.com

http://www.strategyzoneonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361

.


10 posted on 08/23/2005 5:03:04 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

btt


11 posted on 08/23/2005 5:06:14 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hershey
I'm with you......SHOUTING and more shouting is called for.

Keep this bumbed to the top.....ALL DAY

12 posted on 08/23/2005 5:08:07 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

Dan, I get your point...BUT, the caps were intended to distinguish the actual transcript from my own editorial comments. Since there's been so much discussion about what National Geographic actually said, it was important to me to be ACCURATE. If your sensibilities are offended, don't take it personal. Have a great day.


13 posted on 08/23/2005 5:09:22 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
It would be helpful if you identified the shoddy part and the part that doesn't make sense.

If it is untrue or unsupported, it is shoddy, but it makes sense to me. Transcripts often read poorly because spoken dialog is not grammatically clean.
14 posted on 08/23/2005 5:10:38 AM PDT by js1138 (Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

"Setting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense."

Huh?

Having twice watched that part of the program, I find the quoted sentence both to be well-constructed and to make perfect sense when considered in context. The National Geographic special was excellent, in my opinion.


15 posted on 08/23/2005 5:10:53 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

I certainly don't take it personally. I think it's just a law of human nature, as I've observed -- folks don't want to read all caps. It's considered shouting.

Your fundamental idea was a good one. In the future, to make sure you're better-heard, I'd suggest using bold for one, plain for the other; or italics; or you could even use red font.

One man's opinion, your milage may vary.

Dan


16 posted on 08/23/2005 5:11:29 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

bttt


17 posted on 08/23/2005 5:12:52 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

The record quotes Rep Weldon on the floor of the House saying "here is the unclassified chart" as he spoke. The 9/11 Omission should ask (respectfully!) for that chart at least. Perhaps Weldon has even more.


18 posted on 08/23/2005 5:13:03 AM PDT by NetValue (No enemy has inflicted as much damage on America as liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Notice the dems' thundering silence. Not a peep. The only one talking is Clinton, covering his behind.


19 posted on 08/23/2005 5:13:14 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

BUMP!!!!

Clintons = Hear no Atta, See no Atta, Speak no Atta!!!!


20 posted on 08/23/2005 5:14:48 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson