Posted on 08/24/2005 5:29:06 AM PDT by Kewlhand`tek
Now we have the Casey Nethercott Case, where Nethercott was never a traveler to any terrorist-sponsoring nation, and is not publicly alleged to have presented any terrorist threat to America whatsoever. Nevertheless, he was held without charges in the Pima County Jail for 3 weeks on a "Governors Warrant" that Ive never heard of, and he has since disappeared into the bowels of Texas somewhere
This whole thing was part of his "cover" for destroying the Ranch Rescue organization.
Basically, he was already a convicted felon (did prison time in California) who suddenly showed up in Ranch Rescue, which was an organization that carried out armed patrols.
Generally, convicted felons are not allowed to possess firearms. And the felons know this.
Once in Ranch Rescue, he proceeded to act like a loose cannon.
This thing stinks. If we're getting accurate information (and that's being questioned) a homeowner has been blindsided by an anti-American conspiracy (hate to use that word but can't think of a better one) and his ranch stolen from him.
He didn't bother to send a representative to the court.
In a civil trial, the defense has to actually put up a defense, because the standard is the majority of the evidence. If only the plaintiff puts up evidence, then the plaintiff's evidence is the only thing anyone has to go on.
Nethercott is not a victim. He was (probably very well) paid by Uncle Sam to infiltrate and wreck Ranch Rescue, and accomplished his mission.
Evidence?
He was a convicted felon, who couldn't possess firearms, and he joined a very high-profile group that conducted armed patrols. He then acted like a loose cannon.
His whole act was "I'm a felon with guns, arrest me!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.