Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/29/2005 7:18:35 PM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wequalswinner

I hope this case does go to the top.


2 posted on 08/29/2005 7:22:49 PM PDT by secret garden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wequalswinner

Posted earlier today


3 posted on 08/29/2005 7:39:17 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wequalswinner
Then this:

Missing from Mr. Jacoby’s accounting is that Allen and Patricia Muth abandoned their middle child, who was disabled, at the home of a baby sitter; this is how the couple came to the attention of Wisconsin, which subsequently moved to terminate their parental rights and charge them with incest. Both were convicted of violating Wisconsin Statutes § 944.06. Following the exhaustion of his state court remedies, Allen Muth filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in U.S. district court, asserting the unconstitutionality of Wisconsin’s anti-incest statute. The district court denied the petition, and in June the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed; you can read its opinion here.

Right Side of the Rainbow:Constitutional Law Archives

4 posted on 08/29/2005 7:44:02 PM PDT by fat city ("The nation that controls magnetism controls the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wequalswinner

Ah our justice system. One word. SUCKS!


5 posted on 08/29/2005 8:15:03 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson